GGRF Zero Emission Technologies Grants in North Dakota

EPA CFDA 66.959 joined to North Dakota

CFDA 66.959 is titled Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund: Section 134(A)(1) - Zero Emission Technologies Grant Program. Filtered to North Dakota place of performance, obligations sum to $198,030,000 on 2 awards. The national CFDA 66.959 hub includes every state. North Dakota federal spending includes every program. This tie is the overlap — the pair, not a causal story. Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund zero-emission technology grants often concentrate in one or two large awards. The packet does not name projects or tons avoided.

Two awards against this dollar book is a concentrated filing pattern. A few instruments can dominate the mean; the packet does not name them. Readers sometimes treat a large CFDA–state total as if it were a budget line the state legislature passed. $198,030,000 is not that. It is the USAspending obligation sum on awards tagged 66.959 and ND. Correlation is not causation. Campaign-finance tables are a different dataset; donations do not fund these awards.

Section 134(a)(1) grants are not every EPA air line

Other EPA air, water, and greenhouse-gas catalogs use different CFDA numbers. Those lines are not this Section 134(a)(1) zero-emission grant cell. Packet facts are North Dakota, CFDA 66.959, $198,030,000, and 2 awards. Formula shares, recipient lists, and outcome scores are not in the facts. The catalog title names Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund: Section 134(A)(1) - Zero Emission Technologies Grant Program, not a carbon-inventory ranking or LIHEAP.

The only numeric facts on this packet are $198,030,000, 2 awards, CFDA 66.959, program title Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund: Section 134(A)(1) - Zero Emission Technologies Grant Program, and geography ND/North Dakota. Any other dollar, year, recipient, or percentage would be invented. Trivial arithmetic is allowed: 2 awards into $198,030,000 is about $99.02 million per award. That quotient is a mean of records, not a typical household, student, patient, or GGRF zero-emission grants unit.

North Dakota as an energy-project geography tag

North Dakota’s place-of-performance tag is a statewide code, not an oilfield map. Fargo, Bismarck, and the Bakken are ordinary place names, not splits. Awards coded to Minnesota, Montana, or South Dakota stay on other ties. Place of performance ND is a two-letter code in the award file. It does not prove where every subcontract ran, and it does not convert $198,030,000 into a county map. Awards with a different state code are outside this cell even if people, patients, or riders cross the border.

North Dakota federal spending is the all-program parent. CFDA 66.959 is the national program page without the North Dakota filter. North Dakota programs lists other catalogs beside Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund: Section 134(A)(1) - Zero Emission Technologies Grant Program. $198,030,000 is not North Dakota’s complete federal footprint.

Two awards against the GGRF cell

$198,030,000 ÷ 2 is about $99.02 million per award. That average is a ratio of two packet facts, not a median and not a posted unit price. With n = 2, a few large instruments can dominate, or many small actions can stack. Treat two as a record count in an aggregate, not as two finished projects. USAspending obligations can be positive new awards or net of downward modifications; $198,030,000 is the net total supplied in the facts.

Without a transaction register on this page, you cannot see how many of the 2 rows are continuations, renewals, or corrections. Unique recipients are unpublished. Tons avoided and project names are unpublished. Two large instruments can dominate a Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund cell without describing the state’s energy mix.

Emissions rankings the pair cannot produce

An obligation is a legal commitment. An outlay is a payment. $198,030,000 is the former. This packet has no outlay total, no fiscal-year split, and no de-obligation history. Citing the figure as cash already cleared in North Dakota over-reads the field. Keep the obligation word when you quote Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund: Section 134(A)(1) - Zero Emission Technologies Grant Program in North Dakota. FEC filings do not pay USAspending cells. The join cannot say that North Dakota specialized in GGRF zero-emission grants because of federal demand, or the reverse.

North Dakota × 66.959 overlay and parents

The overlay target is Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund: Section 134(A)(1) - Zero Emission Technologies Grant Program in North Dakota. Open that path for the same $198,030,000 / 2-award cell in the site’s data chrome. CFDA 66.959 drops the North Dakota filter. North Dakota federal spending drops the CFDA filter. North Dakota programs lists sibling catalogs. All spending ties is the directory of other pairs. None of those links convert the cell into a carbon-inventory ranking or LIHEAP, into outlays this packet omits, or into a causal claim. Cite both sides: Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund: Section 134(A)(1) - Zero Emission Technologies Grant Program and North Dakota, $198,030,000, 2 awards, USAspending.gov, obligations only.

Questions

How much GGRF zero-emission grant funding is in North Dakota?

USAspending.gov records $198,030,000 in Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund: Section 134(A)(1) - Zero Emission Technologies Grant Program obligations (CFDA 66.959) with North Dakota place of performance across 2 awards. That is an obligation aggregate for the program–state pair, not an outlay and not North Dakota’s full federal book. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov.

Does 2 awards mean 2 power plants?

The extract lists 2 award actions totaling $198,030,000. Two awards against this dollar book is a concentrated filing pattern. A few instruments can dominate the mean; the packet does not name them. Average obligation per award is about $99.02 million, a ratio of two packet facts, not a typical invoice. Unique recipients are not published on this packet.

Is this North Dakota’s full EPA total?

No. $198,030,000 is only the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund: Section 134(A)(1) - Zero Emission Technologies Grant Program cell tagged to North Dakota. Other CFDA programs with North Dakota place of performance sit on North Dakota federal spending. Nationwide CFDA 66.959 is not limited to North Dakota. Mixing sibling catalogs into this total would overstate the join.

Which pages parent CFDA 66.959 in North Dakota?

Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund: Section 134(A)(1) - Zero Emission Technologies Grant Program in North Dakota is the live table for this pair. CFDA 66.959 is the national program hub. North Dakota federal spending is the statewide parent. North Dakota programs indexes other catalogs. All spending ties lists other pairs. Prefer those tables after later USAspending ingests; this page quotes only 66.959 × ND at $198,030,000.