Skip to main content
← All data ties

GGRF Zero Emission Grants awarded by EPA (66.959)

$6,750,200,000 in USAspending.gov obligations sit on Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund: Section 134(A)(1) - Zero Emission Technologies Grant Program (CFDA 66.959) where the awarding agency is Environmental Protection Agency (code 068), across 60 awards. Section 134(A)(1) Zero Emission Technologies Grant Program is CFDA 66.959; EPA is agency 068. This page is that program–agency join, not an emissions-inventory, a vehicle-registration file, or a clean-tech venture ranking. Obligations are not outlays.

Key figures

  • Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund: Section 134(A)(1) - Zero Emission Technologies Grant Program via Environmental Protection Agency: $6,750,200,000 in USAspending obligations (CFDA 66.959, agency 068).
  • Join obligations of $6,750,200,000 equal the CFDA program total of $6,750,200,000.
  • The table lists 60 awards, not a census of technologies.
  • The join is Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund: Section 134(A)(1) - Zero Emission Technologies Grant Program × Environmental Protection Agency, not a climate-fund league table or a named grantee roster.
  • Figures are obligations, not outlays.

GGRF Zero Emission Grants overlapping EPA — CFDA 66.959

The pair is Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund: Section 134(A)(1) - Zero Emission Technologies Grant Program × Environmental Protection Agency. $6,750,200,000 is the obligation aggregate for rows that carry both CFDA 66.959 and awarding-agency 068. The join obligation $6,750,200,000 equals the CFDA program total of $6,750,200,000 in this extract, so this packet does not publish a leftover GGRF Zero Emission Grants slice at a second awarding agency. Correlation is not causation: the join does not prove that Environmental Protection Agency caused GGRF Zero Emission Grants activity, only that USAspending coded the two keys together. It is not a climate-fund league table or a named grantee roster.

SpendingVault indexes the cell from USAspending.gov. The catalog title on the program side is GREENHOUSE GAS REDUCTION FUND: SECTION 134(A)(1) - ZERO EMISSION TECHNOLOGIES GRANT PROGRAM. The agency name on the awarding side is Environmental Protection Agency. Neither label is a contractor, a place of performance, or a fiscal-year stamp — this packet publishes no fiscal year. Cite $6,750,200,000 as obligations on the GGRF Zero Emission Grants–EPA pair.

CFDA 66.959 as the zero-emission technologies grant side

CFDA 66.959 is the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance identifier for Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund: Section 134(A)(1) - Zero Emission Technologies Grant Program. The program-wide obligation total in this extract is $6,750,200,000. That figure is a program rollup, not a second headline for the Environmental Protection Agency slice unless the two amounts match. Do not treat $6,750,200,000 as cash Treasury already sent. Grantee names, technology types, and places of performance are unpublished on this packet.

Open CFDA 66.959 at /programs/66.959/ for the program hub. That page is not this join: it can include other awarding agencies if the extract lists them, and it is still obligations rather than outlays. This ties page stays on CFDA 66.959 awarded by agency 068 only.

Agency 068, Environmental Protection Agency

Environmental Protection Agency is awarding-agency 068 on USAspending assistance rows. The agency hub Environmental Protection Agency at /agencies/068/ rolls up every program that agency awards in the index, not only GGRF Zero Emission Grants. Reading $6,750,200,000 as Environmental Protection Agency’s entire book would over-read this cell. The join is one CFDA inside one agency, not a department budget justification.

Do not add Federal Election Commission contribution totals to $6,750,200,000. Campaign-finance receipts and USAspending award obligations are separate public-record systems even when a geography or a calendar year happens to overlap. This packet has no FEC facts.

60 awards as a CFDA table, not a project census

The extract lists 60 awards on the GGRF Zero Emission Grants × Environmental Protection Agency table. That is an award-record count, not a census of technologies. Unique recipients are unpublished. Modifications can add rows without naming a new organization. Dividing $6,750,200,000 by 60 is not published here as a typical award size, because the packet does not say the rows are comparable.

Emissions rankings this GGRF–EPA join cannot support

An obligation is a legal commitment. An outlay is a payment. $6,750,200,000 is the former. Citing it as cash already cleared on GGRF Zero Emission Grants over-reads the field. The join cannot say that Environmental Protection Agency specialized in GGRF Zero Emission Grants because of a policy success metric this packet omits. Keep $6,750,200,000 labeled as Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund: Section 134(A)(1) - Zero Emission Technologies Grant Program obligations awarded by Environmental Protection Agency.

Hubs for CFDA 66.959 × agency 068

Open /programs/66.959/ for CFDA 66.959, /agencies/068/ for Environmental Protection Agency, /programs/ (All programs) for other catalog lines, and /ties/ (All spending ties) for other pairs. None of those links convert this cell into a climate-fund league table or a named grantee roster, into outlays this packet omits, or into a contractor list. Cite both sides: Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund: Section 134(A)(1) - Zero Emission Technologies Grant Program and Environmental Protection Agency, $6,750,200,000, USAspending.gov, obligations only.

Questions

How much did Environmental Protection Agency award on Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund: Section 134(A)(1) - Zero Emission Technologies Grant Program?
USAspending.gov records $6,750,200,000 in Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund: Section 134(A)(1) - Zero Emission Technologies Grant Program obligations awarded by Environmental Protection Agency (CFDA 66.959, agency 068) across 60 awards. That is an obligation aggregate for the pair, not an outlay and not Environmental Protection Agency’s entire book.
Is the $6.75B GGRF zero-emission figure cash already disbursed?
No. $6,750,200,000 is an obligation sum, not an outlay. Payments from the Treasury can lag or differ. This packet has no outlay total for GGRF Zero Emission Grants awarded by Environmental Protection Agency. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov.
Does 60 awards mean 60 technologies deployed?
No. 60 is an award-record count, not a census of technologies. Unique recipients and places of performance are unpublished. Modifications can add rows without a new organization. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov. Keep both the CFDA number and the awarding-agency code in the citation.
Which pages parent GGRF Zero Emission Grants and EPA?
/programs/66.959/ is the program parent. /agencies/068/ is the Environmental Protection Agency parent. /programs/ lists programs. /ties/ lists other pairs. Prefer those tables after later ingests; this page quotes GGRF Zero Emission Grants × EPA at $6,750,200,000.

USAspending.gov CFDA program joined to awarding agency. Obligations are not outlays.