Skip to main content
← All data ties

Grid Infrastructure Deployment And Resilience federal funding in Oregon

Grid Infrastructure Deployment And Resilience (CFDA 81.254) shows $435,979,028 in USAspending.gov obligations with Oregon as place of performance. Nine awards carry that total — a short list of large assistance rows, not nine substations as a census. The join is a Department of Energy listing crossed with a state location field, not Oregon's entire energy budget. The dollars are commitments, not Treasury outlays.

Key figures

  • CFDA 81.254 in Oregon shows $435,979,028 in USAspending obligations on 9 awards.
  • Grid Infrastructure Deployment And Resilience is a DOE listing, not Oregon's full energy budget.
  • Nine awards are rows, not a substation or mile census.
  • The total is commitments, not wires already strung or an outage ranking.

Oregon x 81.254 is a grid-resilience join, not a substation census

This page pairs CFDA 81.254, GRID INFRASTRUCTURE DEPLOYMENT AND RESILIENCE, with Oregon place of performance. The listing covers Energy Department assistance for grid infrastructure deployment and resilience, not every DOE energy code and not utility retail rates. SpendingVault sums tagged obligations: $435,979,028 on 9 awards. The extract does not list utilities, miles, or substations. Treat the pair as a catalog intersection, not a ranking of which state has a more fragile grid, and not a claim that 9 awards equal 9 projects.

Other Energy listings — other grid, weatherization, or generation codes — sit outside $435,979,028 unless they also carry 81.254. Mixing grid resilience with those codes would invent a combined energy figure the packet never computed. Correlation between this obligation sum and outage minutes is not causation. Outage data are not in the packet. Place of performance as Oregon locates the tagged awards; it does not deposit $435,979,028 in utility accounts.

9 awards behind $436.0 million

Mean obligation is about $48,442,114 if $435,979,028 were divided evenly across 9 lines. That ratio is not a published grant size. A nine-row extract can concentrate dollars in a few large infrastructure awards. Award count is a row count, including possible modifications. It is not a count of utilities, substations, or miles.

Nine lines are scannable on the overlay. This page will not invent recipient names. Open Grid Infrastructure Deployment And Resilience in Oregon for the stored table. Do not convert 9 into a map of Oregon substations. The $435,979,028 total remains an obligation rollup on tagged awards, not megawatts installed. Inspect named lines rather than inferring a project list.

Grid obligations are not wires already strung

Infrastructure awards often obligate in large project rows and draw over construction schedules. The $435,979,028 headline is the obligation sum, not a punch-list of miles built and not a Treasury outlay total. No fiscal year is attached. A DOE announcement dated to a particular year is not automatically this join unless it uses CFDA 81.254, Oregon geography, and the obligation metric.

The listing title is Grid Infrastructure Deployment And Resilience. This extract does not split transmission from distribution, and it does not split hardening from new deployment. Those cuts would require award documentation beyond dollars, 9 awards, CFDA 81.254, and Oregon. This page will not invent a share.

What the Oregon 81.254 table omits

The extract has no mile total, no utility list, and no substation table. Facts remain $435,979,028, 9 awards, CFDA 81.254, and Oregon. This page will not invent a ranking against other states' 81.254 joins. Transmission and distribution can both sit in the file; the extract does not label them.

Oregon federal spending and Oregon programs place 81.254 among other listings. CFDA 81.254 is the national catalog line. All spending ties indexes other CFDA x state pairs. Mixing those shelves would invent a share of Energy spending the packet never computed. The $435,979,028 figure is the tagged pair only.

Where the 81.254 x Oregon overlay lives

Start with Grid Infrastructure Deployment And Resilience in Oregon for the 9-award table behind $435,979,028. CFDA 81.254 is the nationwide listing. Oregon federal spending and Oregon programs give state context. All spending ties is the shelf for other program-by-state joins on the same obligation metric. Nine awards are assistance rows, not a substation census. Utility names and mile counts are not in this packet.

Readers who need a different program or a different state should leave this URL rather than adding numbers by hand. The $435,979,028 figure is the tagged CFDA 81.254 × Oregon pair only. USAspending.gov remains the source; SpendingVault republishes the join. Place of performance is a geography tag on awards, not proof that every dollar stayed inside Oregon after obligation. If a later extract revises the rollup, this page's facts will be stale until the packet is rebuilt. Do not annualize $435,979,028 into a per-year run rate: no fiscal year is in the facts.

How to read the Oregon × CFDA 81.254 pair

A ties page exists because two tables meet. One table is the assistance listing (CFDA 81.254). The other is place of performance as Oregon. The headline $435,979,028 is the obligation sum on that intersection. It is not a forecast, not a budget request, and not an outlay. It is also not a claim that CFDA 81.254 caused Oregon's economy to grow, or that Oregon caused CFDA 81.254 awards to exist. Correlation between geography and a catalog code is the join — nothing more.

Use the internal links to step off this pair: the statewide spending shelf, the national program listing, the state's other programs, and the ties index. Each of those pages uses the same obligation metric unless a page says otherwise. If you need award-level names, open the overlay or the stored table rather than treating this narrative as a recipient directory. If you need a different metric — outlays, current-year only, or a different geography — that metric is not in this packet.

Questions

How much grid resilience funding is obligated in Oregon?
USAspending.gov shows $435,979,028 in obligations for CFDA 81.254 with Oregon as place of performance, across 9 awards. The sum is a commitment total on assistance awards, not outlays and not Oregon's full energy budget. Other DOE listings are outside this join unless they also carry 81.254.
Do 9 awards mean 9 Oregon grid projects?
No. Award count is a row count of assistance awards and can include modifications. It is not a project, utility, or mile census. The packet does not name recipients. See the Oregon 81.254 overlay for named lines as USAspending stored them.
Is this Oregon's entire federal energy funding?
No. The join is CFDA 81.254, Grid Infrastructure Deployment And Resilience, crossed with Oregon place of performance. Other DOE generation, weatherization, and research codes use different listings. Those dollars are not inside $435,979,028 unless the award also carries 81.254.
Is $436 million already spent on Oregon grid construction?
Not on this metric. Obligations are recorded commitments on assistance awards. Outlays are payments from the Treasury. The $435,979,028 headline is the obligation rollup in SpendingVault's extract. Construction draws and remaining balances are not published in this packet.

USAspending.gov CFDA program aggregates by place of performance state. Obligations are not outlays.