Habitat Conservation awarded by Department of Commerce
$1,287,100,029.03 in USAspending.gov obligations tags Habitat Conservation (CFDA 11.463) to the Department of Commerce (agency 013). 265 awards carry that cell. The awarding-agency cell equals the program-wide total of $1,287,100,029.03, so every published obligation on this listing in the extract is tagged to that agency. The pair is a catalog listing plus an awarding-agency code, not an acreage census and not cash already paid. USAspending.gov is the source.
Key figures
- CFDA 11.463 × Department of Commerce records $1,287,100,029.03 in USAspending obligations.
- The agency cell equals the program-wide $1,287,100,029.03 book in this extract.
- 265 awards are not an acreage or site census.
- Cite obligations from USAspending.gov, not outlays.
CFDA 11.463 overlapping agency 013
This page joins HABITAT CONSERVATION to the Department of Commerce. $1,287,100,029.03 is the obligation sum on that pair. 265 awards underlie the cell. It is not every Commerce dollar, not a wildlife-refuge inventory, and not an outlay. CFDA 11.463 drops the agency filter. Department of Commerce drops the 11.463 filter.
Because the agency cell equals the program-wide book in this extract, other awarding agencies do not appear on published 11.463 obligations here. That equality is a rollup fact, not a claim that only Commerce could ever use the code. Do not invent restoration contractors, estuary names, or acre totals. Campaign-finance filings do not fund these USAspending obligations.
Habitat Conservation as a catalog title
The official title is HABITAT CONSERVATION. SpendingVault does not grade species lists or restoration methods. $1,287,100,029.03 is an obligation sum, not an ecological score. Other Commerce or interior-sounding conservation listings use other CFDA keys. Mixing them into $1,287,100,029.03 would invent a combined habitat total the packet never computed.
A mean of about $4,856,981.24 per record if $1,287,100,029.03 were split across 265 lines is arithmetic, not a typical restoration agreement. 265 is a row count, including possible continuations. It is not 265 acres and not 265 sites.
Department of Commerce as awarding agency
Agency code 013 is the Department of Commerce. The awarding-agency tag does not name bureaus as sub-agencies in this packet. Department of Commerce is the Commerce parent. All programs lists All programs. All spending ties indexes other program-by-agency pairs. Those shelves are larger than this cell.
What 265 habitat rows omit
No outlays, no acreage table, no named primes, no state split. Place-of-performance geography is unpublished here. Quote Habitat Conservation and Department of Commerce with $1,287,100,029.03. Keep the obligation label.
Later bulk files can move $1,287,100,029.03 and 265. Do not annualize $1,287,100,029.03: no fiscal year is in the facts. Correlation with storm or fishery headlines is not causation.
Citing 11.463 awarded by Commerce
Use CFDA 11.463 for CFDA 11.463, Department of Commerce for the Department of Commerce, All programs for All programs, and All spending ties for All spending ties. Keep both join sides on the same line as $1,287,100,029.03. USAspending.gov remains the source. The 265 rows remain an awarding-agency intersection, not a site directory.
A ties page exists because two tables meet. One table is CFDA 11.463. The other is awarding agency 013. $1,287,100,029.03 is the obligation sum on that intersection, not a forecast and not a claim that Commerce caused habitat acres to recover. Step off this pair through the internal links.
Original award filings remain on USAspending.gov. SpendingVault republishes the join as a catalog intersection. Keep both sides of the pair in any citation. Later bulk files can move the dollars and the award-record count. Treat this JSON as a packet snapshot rather than a permanent press total.
Do not invent contractors or award recipients. Do not convert obligations into outlays. Campaign-finance filings are a different public-record system and do not fund this USAspending cell. Use the internal links to step off this pair onto parent hubs.
The headline dollar figure is a commitment total on tagged awards, not a Treasury payment register. Award count is a row count and can include continuations and modifications. Unique recipients remain unpublished.
Cite the catalog listing and the second join key in the same sentence as the obligation sum. Parent hubs are larger than this cell and must not be added into the headline.
This page reports what the packet published: an obligation rollup, an award-record count, and the two join keys. It does not report outlays, named vendors, or a geography split. Keep USAspending.gov as the cited source.
Questions
- How much Habitat Conservation funding did Commerce obligate?
- USAspending.gov records $1,287,100,029.03 in CFDA 11.463 obligations tagged to the Department of Commerce across 265 awards. In this extract that agency cell equals the program-wide $1,287,100,029.03 book. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov.
- Do 265 awards mean 265 restoration sites?
- No. 265 is an award-record count. A mean of about $4,856,981.24 per record is not a typical project. Recipients and acreage are unpublished. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov. The join is a catalog intersection, not a budget.
- Is this Commerce’s entire conservation book?
- No. The cell is CFDA 11.463 only. Other Commerce catalog lines sit on Department of Commerce. Mixing siblings would invent a combined conservation total the packet never computed. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov. The join is a catalog intersection, not a budget.
- Does $1,287,100,029.03 equal restoration work already finished?
- No. $1,287,100,029.03 is an obligation aggregate. Outlays and remaining balances are unpublished. FEC donations do not fund this USAspending cell. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov. The join is a catalog intersection, not a budget. Obligations remain commitments, not Treasury outlays.
USAspending.gov CFDA program joined to awarding agency. Obligations are not outlays.