Highway Planning And Construction in Indiana 9th District (IN-09)

IN-09 × 20.205 without a paving ranking

This page is a join: Highway Planning And Construction and Indiana 9th District (IN-09). $703,894,124.51 is the obligation sum on awards that carry both the CFDA 20.205 tag and congressional-district place of performance IN-09. It is not Indiana’s statewide Highway Planning And Construction book, not the nationwide program total, and not the entire federal transportation book for the state. Indiana 9th District is the district parent. CFDA 20.205 is the program parent. Correlation is not causation.

828 is an award-action count. Modifications can add rows. Unique recipients are unpublished, and this page will not invent contractors. Dividing $703,894,124.51 by 828 yields about $850,113.68 per award, a ratio of two packet facts, not a typical paving contract or a typical mile of road. FEC contribution tables do not fund these USAspending obligations. A thick highway file can hide modifications. This page will not invent contractors or name letting packages.

CFDA 20.205 as formula highway work, not a contractor roster

The official catalog title is HIGHWAY PLANNING AND CONSTRUCTION. SpendingVault does not grade Indiana 9th District (IN-09) on Highway Planning And Construction, backlog, or policy. $703,894,124.51 is an obligation sum, not a verdict. CFDA 20.205 without the district filter is the national hub; this packet has no national total, so none is quoted. Transit capital, rail, or airport listings remain outside $703,894,124.51.

FHWA Highway Statistics, STIP documents, and state DOT dashboards are other series. They are not the 828 awards on USAspending.gov. Mixing a census from those files with this join would invent a per-unit dollar figure the packet does not support. STIP, interchange, and rural-connector folklore is ordinary speech, not a packet field. PA-08 and IL-12 also carry 20.205 in this slice on different stamps. Matching CFDA codes do not merge those dollars into IN-09.

Indiana 9th District besides Highway Planning

Indiana 9th District (IN-09) is the geography side. Place of performance IN-09 is a coding field in the award file. It does not prove residency of beneficiaries, students, patients, or vendors. Indiana federal spending is the statewide parent and includes other districts. Bloomington–Jeffersonville speech is not a county highway map. Neighboring IN-08 cells stay outside. A Highway Planning And Construction award tagged to IN-06 or IN-08 is not here.

The district’s all-program obligation total is $7,584,573,581.03. $703,894,124.51 is the Highway Planning And Construction slice of that book, about 9.3%. Remaining district dollars sit with other CFDAs on Indiana 9th District, not inside this join. Quoting $703,894,124.51 as Indiana 9th District (IN-09)’s entire federal book would drop every other catalog line.

Eight hundred twenty-eight awards behind the IN-09 total

828 awards against $703,894,124.51 implies about $850,113.68 per award. That mean is not a unit price and not a typical paving contract or a typical mile of road. Formula highway awards and modifications can dominate dollars while the row count stays at 828. 828 rows can include continuations and amendments. Treat the count as records in an aggregate, not as 828 finished projects or 828 people. All spending ties lists other district-by-program pairs on the same obligation metric.

Highway obligations versus draws already requested

An obligation is a recorded commitment. An outlay is a payment from the Treasury. $703,894,124.51 is the commitment figure. This packet has no outlay total and no fiscal-year split, so none is invented. Citing the figure as cash already spent in Indiana 9th District (IN-09) over-reads the field. Do not rank Indiana 9th District (IN-09) as a winner or loser versus other districts. Keep both sides in the citation: Highway Planning And Construction (CFDA 20.205) and Indiana 9th District (IN-09).

Budget documents from the Bloomington–Jeffersonville stretch as speech only and Indiana appropriations answer other questions. They are not the source of this cell. If a chart mixes General Fund activity with CFDA 20.205 in IN-09, the chart has left the federal award series. South-central Indiana as speech, not a packet metro did not receive $703,894,124.51 as a named metro in this packet.

How to cite the 20.205 × IN-09 cell

Cite: Highway Planning And Construction (CFDA 20.205) obligated $703,894,124.51 on 828 awards coded to Indiana 9th District (IN-09), per USAspending.gov. Keep both keys. Keep the word obligations. Open Indiana 9th District for the district rollup, CFDA 20.205 for the program rollup, Indiana federal spending for Indiana statewide spending, and All spending ties for other pairs. Later bulk files can move the dollars and the 828-award count; prefer those tables when the live overlay and this snapshot diverge. None of those links convert this cell into the entire federal transportation book for the state, into outlays this packet omits, or into a contractor list.

Questions

How much Highway Planning And Construction funding is obligated in Indiana 9th District (IN-09)?

USAspending.gov records $703,894,124.51 in CFDA 20.205 obligations with Indiana 9th District (IN-09) place of performance across 828 awards. That is a program × district join, not an outlay and not Indiana’s full federal total.

Do 828 awards mean 828 local project, mile,s?

No. 828 is an award-action count and can include modifications. Unique recipients are unpublished. Average obligation is about $850,113.68 per award, a ratio of two packet facts, not a typical paving contract or a typical mile of road.

Is this Indiana 9th District (IN-09)’s entire federal spending total?

No. $703,894,124.51 is only the Highway Planning And Construction slice tagged to Indiana 9th District (IN-09), about 9.3% of the district’s $7,584,573,581.03 all-program total. Indiana federal spending is the statewide parent. Other CFDAs on Indiana 9th District sit outside this join.

Where are the live IN-09 and CFDA 20.205 tables?

Indiana 9th District is the district parent. CFDA 20.205 is the CFDA 20.205 hub. Indiana federal spending is the Indiana parent. All spending ties lists other pairs. Prefer those tables after later ingests; this page quotes 20.205 × IN-09 at $703,894,124.51.