How much Highway planning spending is coded to South Dakota At-Large District (SD-00)?

USAspending.gov lists $992,762,219.18 in Highway Planning And Construction obligations across 576 awards with place of performance in South Dakota At-Large District (SD-00). CFDA 20.205 × SD-00 is an obligation join, not an outlay and not South Dakota’s complete federal ledger. The cell is 4.9% of the district’s published total ($20,304,783,123.44). Unique recipients are unpublished. Average obligation is about $1,723,545.52, a ratio of those two facts only.

Do 576 awards mean 576 projects, miles, or contractors in SD-00?

No. Award count is a row count of USAspending actions and can include continuations and modifications. It is not a count of projects, miles, or contractors. The packet does not name recipients. See South Dakota At-Large District for named lines as USAspending stored them. The packet does not split planning from construction, and it does not name contractors.

Is $992,762,219.18 cash already paid in South Dakota At-Large District (SD-00)?

No. Obligations are commitments recorded on USAspending.gov awards. Outlays — money that actually left the Treasury — are a different concept and are not this packet’s headline. Treating $992,762,219.18 as pavement already placed confuses those terms. Later ingests can revise 576 awards. Prefer the live district and program hubs if the tables moved.

How does this Highway planning cell relate to South Dakota statewide spending?

South Dakota federal spending is the South Dakota statewide extract across programs. $992,762,219.18 is the Highway Planning And Construction amount inside South Dakota At-Large District (SD-00) only, not the statewide Highway planning total. Adding South Dakota federal spending to $992,762,219.18 double-counts. CFDA 20.205 nationwide lives on CFDA 20.205. This join is 20.205 × SD-00.

← All data ties

Highway planning (CFDA 20.205) in South Dakota At-Large (SD-00)

$992,762,219.18 is the USAspending.gov obligation sum for CFDA 20.205 (Highway Planning And Construction) inside South Dakota At-Large District (SD-00), on 576 award records. Five hundred seventy-six highway awards equal about five percent of South Dakota At-Large’s district obligation total — a thick FHWA file on a whole-state district stamp. That pair is Highway Planning And Construction and South Dakota At-Large District (SD-00) — not South Dakota’s entire federal inflow, not Highway Planning And Construction nationwide, and not cash already paid. The cell is 4.9% of this district’s published obligation total ($20,304,783,123.44). Implied average obligation is about $1,723,545.52 ($992,762,219.18 ÷ 576). Correlation is not causation.

Key figures

Highway planning in South Dakota At-Large District (SD-00): $992,762,219.18 across 576 USAspending awards.
Implied mean about $1,723,545.52 per record; district share 4.9% of $20,304,783,123.44.
CFDA 20.205 × SD-00 is an obligation join, not an outlay and not a named-recipient list.
Cite USAspending.gov; quote South Dakota At-Large District and CFDA 20.205 if live tables moved.
South Dakota federal spending and All spending ties are parents and an index, not amounts to add into $992,762,219.18.

Highway Planning And Construction and South Dakota At-Large District (SD-00) as a USAspending pair

CFDA 20.205 and congressional district SD-00 meet here. $992,762,219.18 is the USAspending.gov obligation sum on awards that carry both tags. It is not Highway Planning And Construction’s nationwide total, not every federal dollar coded to South Dakota At-Large District (SD-00), and not an outlay register. The packet does not split planning from construction, and it does not name contractors. 576 is an action count: modifications and repeat awards add rows. Unique recipients are unpublished. It is not a lane-mile inventory, a project-letting calendar, or a named-contractor roster.

Dividing $992,762,219.18 by 576 yields about $1,723,545.52 per award on average. That ratio is two packet facts. It is not a published cost per mile and not a typical project. 576 awards is a moderately thick planning-and-construction file. Vermont At-Large’s 1,086-row 20.205 pair is a different at-large stamp. Do not treat SD-00’s 20.205 cell as a synonym for every Highway planning account nationwide. Open South Dakota At-Large District for the district table without this program filter, CFDA 20.205 for CFDA 20.205 without the SD-00 filter, South Dakota federal spending for every program in the South Dakota extract, and All spending ties for the rest of the join list. Quote those hubs as parents, not as addends to $992,762,219.18.

How USAspending labels Highway Planning And Construction

USAspending labels CFDA 20.205 as Highway Planning And Construction. That catalog number produced $992,762,219.18 when crossed with South Dakota At-Large District (SD-00) place of performance. The program hub does not require SD-00 geography. The district hub does not require Highway planning. Only this tie applies both filters, which is why it cites 576 awards. The packet does not split planning from construction, and it does not name contractors.

Correlation is not causation: South Dakota At-Large District (SD-00) did not cause $992,762,219.18 by existing as a large or small place, and VMT or lane miles figures are not packet facts. The join is 20.205 × SD-00 only. It is not a lane-mile inventory, a project-letting calendar, or a named-contractor roster. Do not invent contractors or award recipients to fill the gap. Campaign donations on FEC tables do not fund this USAspending cell; the datasets are separate.

Geography is SD-00, not a facility map

South Dakota At-Large District (SD-00) on this join is a USAspending geography field, not a claim that every dollar was disbursed to residents of that district. Awards can list SD-00 while later work occurs elsewhere. Awards tagged to other South Dakota districts belong on those ties even when the CFDA is also 20.205. South Dakota At-Large District (SD-00) is South Dakota’s at-large congressional geography in the USAspending district field, so the stamp covers the state as one district rather than a numbered slice. South Dakota At-Large District (SD-00) is the state’s single congressional geography in USAspending’s district field, not a numbered slice.

South Dakota federal spending shows how CFDA 20.205 sits beside other programs in the same state extract. $992,762,219.18 is one district-program column, not the state table. This packet does not split South Dakota At-Large District (SD-00) by county, city, or census tract. Awards that carry a different CFDA stay on those other ties even if the work sounds related to Highway Planning And Construction. The district-wide obligation total published here is $20,304,783,123.44; $992,762,219.18 is the Highway planning slice of that denominator.

Commitment totals versus cash paid

USAspending.gov records an obligation when the federal government commits funds on an award. $992,762,219.18 is that kind of sum for Highway Planning And Construction inside SD-00 coding. Later deobligations, recoveries, or payment schedules can change what leaves the Treasury without this join rewriting itself into a cash register. This packet does not split assistance from contracts. Net obligations can include downward adjustments. This page reports $992,762,219.18 as given. Treating $992,762,219.18 as pavement already placed confuses obligation with outlay.

Keeping both sides of the 20.205 × SD-00 pair

Cite USAspending.gov: Highway Planning And Construction (CFDA 20.205) obligated $992,762,219.18 on 576 awards coded to South Dakota At-Large District (SD-00). Name Highway Planning And Construction and South Dakota At-Large District (SD-00) together. Keep the obligation word. If South Dakota At-Large District or CFDA 20.205 has refreshed, prefer the live hub over this snapshot for current rows. The pair is not a lane-mile inventory, a project-letting calendar, or a named-contractor roster. 4.9% of $20,304,783,123.44 is the district share on this packet, not a performance score. An fhwa highway-statistics table is a different series unless it uses CFDA 20.205, SD-00 geography, and the obligation metric.

Share, mean, and what they are not

576 awards is a moderately thick planning-and-construction file. Vermont At-Large’s 1,086-row 20.205 pair is a different at-large stamp. A large row count makes a program split tempting; the packet still does not supply one. A small row count makes a named-recipient story tempting; the packet still does not name projects, contractors, or lane miles. The implied mean (about $1,723,545.52) and the district share (4.9% of $20,304,783,123.44) are ratios of packet facts. Prefer South Dakota At-Large District and CFDA 20.205 if the live tables moved.

Do not rank South Dakota At-Large District (SD-00) as more Highway planning-dependent than neighboring districts on the strength of this cell alone. Neighboring geographies have their own 20.205 ties with different dollar totals, or no published 20.205 cell in this harvest. This snapshot holds $992,762,219.18 and 576 only. District 90 and 98 placeholders are omitted from this harvest. SD-00 is the at-large code, not those placeholders. All spending ties is the index, not an addend. Obligations are not outlays. Correlation is not causation. A reader who quotes $992,762,219.18 without South Dakota At-Large District (SD-00) and CFDA 20.205 has dropped a join side.

Questions

How much Highway planning spending is coded to South Dakota At-Large District (SD-00)?: USAspending.gov lists $992,762,219.18 in Highway Planning And Construction obligations across 576 awards with place of performance in South Dakota At-Large District (SD-00). CFDA 20.205 × SD-00 is an obligation join, not an outlay and not South Dakota’s complete federal ledger. The cell is 4.9% of the district’s published total ($20,304,783,123.44). Unique recipients are unpublished. Average obligation is about $1,723,545.52, a ratio of those two facts only.
Do 576 awards mean 576 projects, miles, or contractors in SD-00?: No. Award count is a row count of USAspending actions and can include continuations and modifications. It is not a count of projects, miles, or contractors. The packet does not name recipients. See South Dakota At-Large District for named lines as USAspending stored them. The packet does not split planning from construction, and it does not name contractors.
Is $992,762,219.18 cash already paid in South Dakota At-Large District (SD-00)?: No. Obligations are commitments recorded on USAspending.gov awards. Outlays — money that actually left the Treasury — are a different concept and are not this packet’s headline. Treating $992,762,219.18 as pavement already placed confuses those terms. Later ingests can revise 576 awards. Prefer the live district and program hubs if the tables moved.
How does this Highway planning cell relate to South Dakota statewide spending?: South Dakota federal spending is the South Dakota statewide extract across programs. $992,762,219.18 is the Highway Planning And Construction amount inside South Dakota At-Large District (SD-00) only, not the statewide Highway planning total. Adding South Dakota federal spending to $992,762,219.18 double-counts. CFDA 20.205 nationwide lives on CFDA 20.205. This join is 20.205 × SD-00.

USAspending.gov congressional district place-of-performance joined to CFDA program. Obligations are not outlays.