Indian Housing Block Grants obligations in Arizona
USAspending.gov records $2,802,922,724.20 in Indian Housing Block Grants obligations (CFDA 14.867) with place of performance in Arizona, across 22 awards. Twenty-two instruments against $2.80 billion produce a mean of about $127.4 million per award. This page joins HUD catalog 14.867 to the AZ geography tag. It is not a tribal housing census and not Arizona’s full federal total. Obligations are not outlays.
Key figures
- CFDA 14.867 shows $2,802,922,724.20 in Arizona obligations on 22 awards.
- Mean obligation is about $127.4 million per award.
- The catalog is Indian Housing Block Grants, not Housing Choice Vouchers.
- Arizona is a geography tag, not a reservation map.
- Figures are obligations, not outlays.
IHBG catalog meeting Arizona
CFDA 14.867 is titled INDIAN HOUSING BLOCK GRANTS. Filtered to Arizona place of performance, obligations sum to $2,802,922,724.20 on 22 awards. The national 14.867 hub includes every state. The Arizona spending hub includes every program. This tie is the overlap.
Twenty-two awards is a concentrated block-grant pattern. IHBG funds typically flow to tribally designated housing entities rather than a long list of household invoices. The join does not name those entities, list reservations, or count units. Packet facts are $2,802,922,724.20, 22 awards, AZ, and 14.867.
Readers sometimes treat a large CFDA–state total as if it were a budget line the state legislature passed. $2,802,922,724.20 is not that. It is the USAspending obligation sum on awards tagged 14.867 and AZ. The overlay table at the program-in-state path is the same cell rendered as a page; this narrative is the join explained in prose. Nothing here ranks Arizona against other states on need, performance, or politics.
Twenty-two awards totaling $2,802,922,724.20 (about $127.41 million mean) describe IHBG tagged Arizona. Reservations that cross state lines can have awards coded elsewhere. Tribal housing entities are not named. Housing Choice Vouchers are a different HUD CFDA.
14.867 is not Housing Choice Vouchers
Indian Housing Block Grants and tenant-based vouchers are different HUD catalogs. Mixing voucher dollars into $2,802,922,724.20 would overstate this cell. Child-care block grants in Arizona use a different CFDA as well.
Facts on this page: Arizona, CFDA 14.867, $2,802,922,724.20, 22 awards. Formula shares, NAHASDA allocations, and unit inventories are not in the facts. The catalog title names IHBG, not a housing-quality ranking.
The only numeric facts on this packet are $2,802,922,724.20, 22 awards, CFDA 14.867, program title Indian Housing Block Grants, and geography AZ/Arizona. Any other dollar, year, recipient, or percentage would be invented. Trivial arithmetic from those facts is allowed: 22 awards into $2,802,922,724.20 is about $127.41 million per award. That quotient is a mean of records, not a typical household, student, or lab.
NAHASDA-style block grants are not tenant-based vouchers. $2,802,922,724.20 is 14.867 × AZ. CCDBG in Arizona is HHS, not HUD. Cross-state reservations require reading place-of-performance codes, not assuming AZ captures every related award.
Arizona as a place-of-performance code
AZ is the USAspending state tag. Awards billed to tribal housing entities with Arizona place of performance sit inside $2,802,922,724.20. Awards coded to New Mexico, Utah, or California stay out even when a reservation crosses a state line.
Arizona federal spending is the all-program parent. CFDA 14.867 is one row on the Arizona programs list. $2.80 billion is not the state’s complete federal footprint.
Place of performance AZ is a two-letter code in the award file. It can mark a state capital, a campus, a housing authority, a transit agency, or a default statewide tag. It does not prove where every subcontract ran, and it does not convert $2,802,922,724.20 into a county map. Awards with a different state code are outside this cell even if people, patients, or riders cross the border.
Twenty-two awards and a $127 million mean
$2,802,922,724.20 ÷ 22 is about $127.4 million per award. That average is an entity-scale block, not a typical household grant and not a median. With n = 22, a few large instruments can dominate. The aggregate is net obligations supplied in the facts.
Treat 22 as a record count in an aggregate, not as 22 finished projects. USAspending obligations can be positive new awards or net of downward modifications; the $2,802,922,724.20 figure is the net total supplied in the facts. Without a transaction register on this page, you cannot see how many of the 22 rows are continuations, renewals, or corrections.
Using the Indian Housing Block Grants–Arizona overlay
The overlay target for this tie is the Arizona × CFDA 14.867 table. Open that path when you want the same $2,802,922,724.20 / 22-award cell in the site’s data chrome. The national program page for CFDA 14.867 drops the Arizona filter. The Arizona spending hub drops the CFDA filter. The Arizona programs index lists other catalogs beside Indian Housing Block Grants. All spending ties is the directory of other pairs.
This page exists because two tables meet: a CFDA program and a place-of-performance state. It does not exist to argue that Arizona “won” or “lost” federal money, that donations paid for the awards, or that obligations equal cash. Correlation is not causation. The headline number remains $2,802,922,724.20 on 22 awards, from USAspending.gov, for Indian Housing Block Grants in Arizona.
What the pair cannot say
A large 14.867 total tagged to Arizona does not measure housing conditions, and it does not equal cash already spent on construction. FEC filings do not fund this USAspending cell. Correlation is not causation.
See Indian Housing Block Grants in Arizona, CFDA 14.867, Arizona federal spending, Arizona programs, and All spending ties.
Questions
- How much Indian Housing Block Grant funding is obligated in Arizona?
- USAspending records $2,802,922,724.20 in CFDA 14.867 obligations with Arizona place of performance across 22 awards. That is the pair aggregate, not an outlay and not every HUD program.
- Does 22 awards mean 22 tribes?
- No. The facts report 22 awards totaling $2,802,922,724.20. Recipient identities and tribal counts are not in the packet facts. An entity can receive more than one award.
- Is this the same as Section 8 vouchers?
- No. This join is CFDA 14.867 only. Voucher catalogs use a different CFDA number.
- What is the average award size?
- About $127.4 million ($2,802,922,724.20 ÷ 22). That mean is not a typical household subsidy.
USAspending.gov CFDA program aggregates by place of performance state. Obligations are not outlays.