Indian Housing Block Grants in Arizona 2nd District (AZ-02)

What the IHBG–AZ-02 join is

CFDA 14.867 and congressional district AZ-02 meet here. $608,993,549.20 is the USAspending.gov obligation sum on awards that carry both tags. It is not Indian Housing Block Grants’s nationwide total, not every federal dollar coded to Arizona 2nd District (AZ-02), and not an outlay register. The packet does not split tribes or unit types and does not name recipients. 9 is an action count: modifications and repeat awards add rows. Unique recipients are unpublished. It is not a housing-unit census, a tribal roster, or a named-grantee file.

Dividing $608,993,549.20 by 9 yields about $67,665,949.91 per award on average. That ratio is two packet facts. It is not a typical per-unit cost or a posted per-tribe figure. Nine awards against a six-hundred-nine-million-dollar IHBG cell is a compact file. Do not invent tribes or housing authorities. Do not treat AZ-02’s 14.867 cell as a synonym for every IHBG account nationwide. Open Arizona 2nd District for the district table without this program filter, CFDA 14.867 for CFDA 14.867 without the AZ-02 filter, Arizona federal spending for every program in the Arizona extract, and All spending ties for the rest of the join list. Quote those hubs as parents, not as addends to $608,993,549.20.

CFDA 14.867 as the IHBG side

USAspending labels CFDA 14.867 as Indian Housing Block Grants. That catalog number produced $608,993,549.20 when crossed with Arizona 2nd District (AZ-02) place of performance. The program-wide 14.867 hub does not require AZ-02 geography. The district hub does not require IHBG. Only this tie applies both filters, which is why it cites 9 awards. The packet does not split tribes or unit types and does not name recipients.

Correlation is not causation: Arizona 2nd District (AZ-02) did not “cause” $608,993,549.20 by existing as a large or small place. Population, outcome scores, and named facilities are not packet facts. The join is 14.867 × AZ-02 only. It is not a housing-unit census, a tribal roster, or a named-grantee file. Do not invent contractors or award recipients to fill the gap. Campaign donations on FEC tables do not fund this USAspending cell; the datasets are separate.

Arizona 2nd District (AZ-02) as place of performance

Arizona 2nd District (AZ-02) on this join is a USAspending geography field, not a claim that every dollar was disbursed to residents of that district. Awards can list AZ-02 while later work occurs elsewhere. Awards tagged to other Arizona districts belong on those ties even when the CFDA is also 14.867. Arizona 2nd District (AZ-02) is a numbered congressional place-of-performance code inside Arizona. Other Arizona districts are separate joins even when they reuse CFDA 14.867. Arizona 2nd District (AZ-02) is a numbered place-of-performance geography inside Arizona. Other Arizona districts are not this join.

Arizona federal spending shows how CFDA 14.867 sits beside other programs in the same state extract. $608,993,549.20 is one district-program column, not the state table. This packet does not split Arizona 2nd District (AZ-02) by county, city, or census tract. Awards that carry a different CFDA stay on those other ties even if the work sounds related to Indian Housing Block Grants. The district-wide obligation total published here is $9,574,996,035.05; $608,993,549.20 is the IHBG slice of that denominator.

Obligations, not outlays

USAspending.gov records an obligation when the federal government commits funds on an award. $608,993,549.20 is that kind of sum for Indian Housing Block Grants inside AZ-02 coding. Later deobligations, recoveries, or payment schedules can change what leaves the Treasury without this join rewriting itself into a cash register. Assistance and contract awards can share the same CFDA rollup; this packet does not split them. Net obligations can include downward adjustments. This page reports $608,993,549.20 as given.

Arizona’s own budget is a separate ledger. Mixing it with the 9-row IHBG cell leaves USAspending.gov. Treat 9 as award records in the aggregate, not unique vendors. 9 is not a count of units, tribes, or households. Do not annualize without a year field in the packet. Do not per-capita or per-recipient the dollar total; those denominators are unpublished. The implied mean ($67,665,949.91) is a concentration statistic, not a typical per-unit cost or a posted per-tribe figure.

How to cite IHBG in AZ-02

Cite USAspending.gov: Indian Housing Block Grants (CFDA 14.867) obligated $608,993,549.20 on 9 awards coded to Arizona 2nd District (AZ-02). Name Indian Housing Block Grants and Arizona 2nd District (AZ-02) together. Keep the obligation word. If Arizona 2nd District or CFDA 14.867 has refreshed, prefer the live hub over this snapshot for current rows. The pair is not a housing-unit census, a tribal roster, or a named-grantee file. 6.4% of $9,574,996,035.05 is the district share on this packet, not a performance score. Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers on California 18th uses CFDA 14.871, a different HUD housing line, not this IHBG cell.

Keep Indian Housing Block Grants, Arizona 2nd District (AZ-02), $608,993,549.20, and 9 awards together. All spending ties indexes other pairs. CFDA 14.867 is the 14.867 parent without a AZ-02 filter. Arizona federal spending is the Arizona parent. Do not add those parents to this cell. Sharing a district with IHBG does not mean campaign donations funded these awards, and it does not convert obligations into outlays. This page reports one USAspending join.

Reading a thin IHBG file in AZ-02

Nine awards against a six-hundred-nine-million-dollar IHBG cell is a compact file. Do not invent tribes or housing authorities. A large row count makes a project split tempting; the packet still does not supply one. A small row count makes a named-facility story tempting; the packet still does not name facilities or contractors. The implied mean (about $67,665,949.91) and the district share (6.4% of $9,574,996,035.05) are ratios of packet facts. Prefer Arizona 2nd District and CFDA 14.867 if the live tables moved.

Do not rank Arizona 2nd District (AZ-02) as more IHBG-dependent than neighboring districts on the strength of this cell alone. Neighboring geographies have their own 14.867 ties with different dollar totals, or no published 14.867 cell in this harvest. This snapshot holds $608,993,549.20 and 9 only. All spending ties is the index, not an addend. Obligations are not outlays. Correlation is not causation.

Questions

How much IHBG spending is coded to Arizona 2nd District (AZ-02)?

USAspending.gov lists $608,993,549.20 in Indian Housing Block Grants obligations across 9 awards with place of performance in Arizona 2nd District (AZ-02). CFDA 14.867 × AZ-02 is an obligation join, not an outlay and not Arizona’s complete federal ledger. The cell is 6.4% of the district’s published total ($9,574,996,035.05). Unique recipients are unpublished. Average obligation is about $67,665,949.91, a ratio of those two facts only.

Does $608,993,549.20 include every IHBG project in AZ-02?

The packet publishes one CFDA rollup. The packet does not split tribes or unit types and does not name recipients. $608,993,549.20 is the combined obligation sum for CFDA 14.867 inside AZ-02 coding. This page will not invent a project pie or name contractors. Open CFDA 14.867 and Arizona 2nd District to inspect parent tables. 9 remains an action count, not a count of units, tribes, or households.

Is $608,993,549.20 cash already paid in Arizona 2nd District (AZ-02)?

No. Obligations are commitments recorded on USAspending.gov awards. Outlays — money that actually left the Treasury — are a different concept and are not this packet’s headline. Treating $608,993,549.20 as checks already cleared in Arizona 2nd District (AZ-02) confuses those terms. Later ingests can revise 9 awards. Prefer the live district and program hubs if the tables moved.

Where is the live IHBG–AZ-02 table?

Arizona 2nd District is the district parent and CFDA 14.867 is the program parent. Arizona federal spending covers Arizona without the district×program intersection as the headline. All spending ties lists other pairs. Those hubs are not addends. Keep both sides of the join when citing $608,993,549.20. Place of performance is AZ-02. Obligations are not outlays.