Skip to main content
← All data ties

Indian Housing Block Grants federal funding in New Mexico

USAspending.gov records $287,542,367.86 in Indian Housing Block Grants obligations (CFDA 14.867) with place of performance in New Mexico, across 25 awards. Twenty-five awards is a short row list for this dollar total. The count is an award-record tally, not a count of households, students, or clinics. This page joins the HUD catalog line to the NM geography tag. It is not a tribal housing census or a Housing Choice Voucher ledger. Obligations are commitments, not outlays.

Key figures

  • CFDA 14.867 shows $287,542,367.86 in New Mexico obligations on 25 awards.
  • Mean obligation is about $11.50 million per award (ratio only).
  • The join is Indian Housing Block Grants × New Mexico place of performance, not Section 8 vouchers or a unit-inventory ranking.
  • Figures are USAspending obligations, not outlays.
  • HUD catalog 14.867 is not New Mexico’s full federal total.

CFDA 14.867 overlapping New Mexico

CFDA 14.867 is titled Indian Housing Block Grants. Filtered to New Mexico place of performance, obligations sum to $287,542,367.86 on 25 awards. The national CFDA 14.867 hub includes every state. New Mexico federal spending includes every program. This tie is the overlap — the pair, not a causal story. Indian Housing Block Grants typically flow to tribally designated housing entities under NAHASDA-style formulas. Reservations that cross state lines can have awards coded to a neighboring state.

Twenty-five awards is a short row list for this dollar total. The count is an award-record tally, not a count of households, students, or clinics. Readers sometimes treat a large CFDA–state total as if it were a budget line the state legislature passed. $287,542,367.86 is not that. It is the USAspending obligation sum on awards tagged 14.867 and NM. Correlation is not causation. Campaign-finance tables are a different dataset; donations do not fund these awards.

NAHASDA-style IHBG versus voucher catalogs

Housing Choice Vouchers, public-housing operating funds, and other HUD catalogs use different CFDA numbers. Mixing them into this cell would overstate the join. Packet facts are New Mexico, CFDA 14.867, $287,542,367.86, and 25 awards. Formula shares, recipient lists, and outcome scores are not in the facts. The catalog title names Indian Housing Block Grants, not Section 8 vouchers or a unit-inventory ranking.

The only numeric facts on this packet are $287,542,367.86, 25 awards, CFDA 14.867, program title Indian Housing Block Grants, and geography NM/New Mexico. Any other dollar, year, recipient, or percentage would be invented. Trivial arithmetic is allowed: 25 awards into $287,542,367.86 is about $11.50 million per award. That quotient is a mean of records, not a typical household, student, patient, or IHBG unit.

New Mexico coding and four-corners reservations

New Mexico’s place-of-performance tag can cover tribal and non-tribal awards coded to the state. Albuquerque and Santa Fe are not columns. Reservations that cross Arizona, Colorado, Utah, or Texas can have related awards coded outside NM. Place of performance NM is a two-letter code in the award file. It does not prove where every subcontract ran, and it does not convert $287,542,367.86 into a county map. Awards with a different state code are outside this cell even if people, patients, or riders cross the border.

New Mexico federal spending is the all-program parent. CFDA 14.867 is the national program page without the New Mexico filter. New Mexico programs lists other catalogs beside Indian Housing Block Grants. $287,542,367.86 is not New Mexico’s complete federal footprint.

Twenty-five awards and a block-grant mean

$287,542,367.86 ÷ 25 is about $11.50 million per award. That average is a ratio of two packet facts, not a median and not a posted unit price. With n = 25, a few large instruments can dominate, or many small actions can stack. Treat twenty-five as a record count in an aggregate, not as twenty-five finished projects. USAspending obligations can be positive new awards or net of downward modifications; $287,542,367.86 is the net total supplied in the facts.

Without a transaction register on this page, you cannot see how many of the 25 rows are continuations, renewals, or corrections. Unique recipients are unpublished. Four Corners and other cross-state reservations can have awards coded to Arizona, Colorado, Utah, or Texas. This cell keeps the NM tag only.

Housing conditions the join does not measure

An obligation is a legal commitment. An outlay is a payment. $287,542,367.86 is the former. This packet has no outlay total, no fiscal-year split, and no de-obligation history. Citing the figure as cash already cleared in New Mexico over-reads the field. Keep the obligation word when you quote Indian Housing Block Grants in New Mexico. FEC filings do not pay USAspending cells. The join cannot say that New Mexico specialized in IHBG because of federal demand, or the reverse.

New Mexico IHBG overlay and parents

The overlay target is Indian Housing Block Grants in New Mexico. Open that path for the same $287,542,367.86 / 25-award cell in the site’s data chrome. CFDA 14.867 drops the New Mexico filter. New Mexico federal spending drops the CFDA filter. New Mexico programs lists sibling catalogs. All spending ties is the directory of other pairs. None of those links convert the cell into Section 8 vouchers or a unit-inventory ranking, into outlays this packet omits, or into a causal claim. Cite both sides: Indian Housing Block Grants and New Mexico, $287,542,367.86, 25 awards, USAspending.gov, obligations only.

Questions

How much IHBG funding is obligated in New Mexico?
USAspending.gov records $287,542,367.86 in Indian Housing Block Grants obligations (CFDA 14.867) with New Mexico place of performance across 25 awards. That is an obligation aggregate for the program–state pair, not an outlay and not New Mexico’s full federal book. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov.
Does 25 awards mean 25 housing authorities?
The extract lists 25 award actions totaling $287,542,367.86. Twenty-five awards is a short row list for this dollar total. The count is an award-record tally, not a count of households, students, or clinics. Average obligation per award is about $11.50 million, a ratio of two packet facts, not a typical invoice. Unique recipients are not published on this packet.
Is this New Mexico’s full HUD total?
No. $287,542,367.86 is only the Indian Housing Block Grants cell tagged to New Mexico. Other CFDA programs with New Mexico place of performance sit on New Mexico federal spending. Nationwide CFDA 14.867 is not limited to New Mexico. Mixing sibling catalogs into this total would overstate the join.
Which hubs parent the 14.867 × NM cell?
Indian Housing Block Grants in New Mexico is the live table for this pair. CFDA 14.867 is the national program hub. New Mexico federal spending is the statewide parent. New Mexico programs indexes other catalogs. All spending ties lists other pairs. Prefer those tables after later USAspending ingests; this page quotes only 14.867 × NM at $287,542,367.86.

USAspending.gov CFDA program aggregates by place of performance state. Obligations are not outlays.