Skip to main content
← All data ties

Indian Housing Block Grants federal obligations in Oklahoma

Indian Housing Block Grants (CFDA 14.867) show $1,780,605,180.34 in USAspending.gov obligations coded to Oklahoma across 46 awards. The pair is a HUD NAHASDA catalog line joined to place of performance, not a ranking of tribal housing authorities and not a count of units built. Obligations are commitments, not construction draws. The Oklahoma × 14.867 overlay holds the rows.

Key figures

  • CFDA 14.867 shows $1,780,605,180.34 in USAspending obligations in Oklahoma.
  • Award count is 46; implied mean about $38.7 million.
  • The join is program × place of performance, not a unit-count ranking.
  • Figures are obligations, not outlays.

NAHASDA formula funds meet Oklahoma coding

This tie keeps USAspending assistance where CFDA 14.867 meets Oklahoma place of performance. The dollar book is $1,780,605,180.34. The award count is 46. Indian Housing Block Grants typically flow to Indian tribes and tribally designated housing entities. Forty-six records do not equal 46 tribes; continuations and modifications can share the tape, and a single TDHE can carry more than one action.

The join does not prove that Oklahoma’s tribal land base, overcrowding rates, or a particular development pipeline caused $1,780,605,180.34. Those are other series. This packet does not list tribes or split new construction from rehabilitation. Correlation is not causation.

A reader who treats the cell as Oklahoma’s full HUD obligation book has left the CFDA-by-state definition. Section 8 and CDBG are different catalog numbers. The 46 figure is a record count, not a unit count.

Forty-six awards and a blended mean

Forty-six awards under $1,780,605,180.34 imply a mean near $38,708,808 per award. Larger TDHE formula shares can sit well above that average; smaller actions can sit below it. The packet has no median and no share on the largest ten awards.

Compared with single-award broadband cells, 46 rows is a thicker housing tape. Cite both columns. USAspending.gov is the source; SpendingVault does not recast the mean as a typical house-construction cost.

Oklahoma’s 14.867 cell versus tribal self-governance

Oklahoma’s state hub stacks every CFDA with performance coded to the state. Indian Housing Block Grants is a HUD line. Interior tribal self-governance (a different catalog number) is a separate cell on the same stack. $1,780,605,180.34 is not Oklahoma’s all-program total. The nationwide CFDA 14.867 page includes every state, so it is not this cell.

Place-of-performance for a tribal housing grant can sit on Oklahoma even when the tribe’s service area crosses state lines. This packet does not reallocate units. Read the overlay as a coding view of 46 awards.

Obligations versus units placed

The $1,780,605,180.34 figure is an obligation sum. Construction and modernization draws can trail the federal obligation by years. SpendingVault does not publish a 14.867-in-Oklahoma outlay total in this packet. Mixing Census overcrowding or HUD unit inventories with this award file leaves the USAspending series.

Cite the join as CFDA 14.867 × Oklahoma, $1,780,605,180.34, 46 awards, obligations only.

Overlay and parent pages

The Oklahoma × Indian Housing Block Grants overlay is the table view. Recipient slices on that hub still sum toward $1,780,605,180.34 on 46 awards. The Oklahoma spending page and the CFDA 14.867 program page are the parents. The Oklahoma programs index and the ties index list other pairs.

None of those links convert the cell into a unit count or into outlays this packet omits.

What Oklahoma Indian housing is not

Indian Housing Block Grants in Oklahoma are not a ranking of tribes and not a count of units built. The $1,780,605,180.34 figure is the CFDA 14.867 × Oklahoma cell. Forty-six awards describe NAHASDA filing, including continuations, not 46 tribes. New construction, rehabilitation, and other eligible activities are not split in this packet.

Interior Tribal Self-Governance (CFDA 15.022) is a different agency’s cell on the same statewide stack. Do not add HUD 14.867 and Interior 15.022 from memory and call the sum “tribal spending.” Cite Indian Housing Block Grants and Oklahoma together, keep the obligation label, and keep the 46-award count. Construction draws can lag the federal obligation.

Oklahoma’s Indian Housing Block Grant cell also does not include formula-share tables by tribe, unit-completion counts, or overcrowding rates. Those series live with HUD and tribally designated housing entities. SpendingVault cites USAspending.gov obligations only: CFDA 14.867 × Oklahoma, $1,780,605,180.34, 46 awards. If a later extract revises the 46-row tape, the implied mean near $38,708,808 moves with it. Quote the packet facts and the overlay path rather than a unit story.

Questions

How much Indian Housing Block Grant spending is in Oklahoma?
USAspending.gov shows $1,780,605,180.34 in CFDA 14.867 obligations coded to Oklahoma across 46 awards. The join uses the program number and Oklahoma place of performance. The total is obligations, not outlays.
Does 46 awards mean 46 tribes received grants?
No. The extract counts 46 award records tagged to CFDA 14.867 and Oklahoma. Continuations and modifications can appear as separate records. The implied mean is about $38,708,808 per award from the two packet facts.
Is $1.78 billion Oklahoma’s full federal spending?
No. $1,780,605,180.34 is only the Indian Housing Block Grants cell. Other CFDA programs with Oklahoma place of performance sit on the statewide hub. Nationwide 14.867 is not limited to Oklahoma.
Do these obligations equal housing units built?
No. $1,780,605,180.34 is an obligation sum. Outlays and unit completions are different series. Construction draws can lag the federal obligation.

USAspending.gov CFDA program aggregates by place of performance state. Obligations are not outlays.