Skip to main content
← All data ties

Iowa federal obligations next to FEC candidate receipts

Iowa’s USAspending.gov extract shows $115,467,658,566 in obligations across 491,259 award actions — one of the densest row counts in this slice — beside $60.1 million in FEC candidate receipts from 478 committees. Democratic filers hold 60.7% of that receipt book. A caucus-calendar story is not a funding path from donors to awards.

Key figures

  • Iowa USAspending: $115,467,658,566 across 491,259 award actions.
  • Iowa FEC receipts: $60.1 million from 478 committees.
  • Democratic committees reported 60.7% of receipts — not of awards.
  • IA geography joins the files. Donations do not fund awards here.

IA joins two tables; caucus folklore does not

SpendingVault indexes $115,467,658,566 in Iowa obligations. LobbyVault indexes $60.1 million in Iowa candidate receipts. The match key is IA. A contribution disclosed during a presidential cycle does not become a contract or grant because both rows mention Iowa. No award ID in this packet maps to an FEC committee ID.

491,259 award actions sit beside 478 candidate committees. Those integers are not comparable headcounts. Award count includes modifications and assistance actions. Filing count includes residual and long-shot committees. Adding $60.1 million to $115,467,658,566 invents an Iowa federal-money headline no agency published.

Open Iowa federal spending for the award table, Iowa FEC totals for the candidate table, and All spending ties for sibling joins. None of those pages converts donations into obligations.

491,259 award actions as a volume statistic

491,259 is a record count, not a unique-vendor census. Farm, health, and disaster folklore are not packet NAICS. Mean dollars per action are about $235,044 if you divide $115,467,658,566 by 491,259 — a calculator output, not a typical USDA line. Repeat awards to the same entity add rows.

Place of performance tagged to Iowa is not proof that every dollar was disbursed in-state. Outlays can lag. Cite $115,467,658,566 as obligations. Recipient names live on Iowa federal spending, not inside the FEC roster.

A large FEC book that is still not an award overlay

Democratic committees reported $36.5 million (60.7% of $60.1 million). Republican committees reported $23.5 million (39.2%). Other filers reported $39,047 (0.1%). 478 federal candidate committees tagged to Iowa sit behind those lines. A 60.7% receipt share is not a share of 491,259 awards.

Party labels travel with candidate committees. USAspending rows here have no Democratic flag. State-office campaigns file under Iowa law and sit outside the FEC extract. Presidential committees tagged to Iowa remain FEC rows if stored that way; they do not become award actions.

Des Moines versus the rest of Iowa is not in the file

This packet does not split $115,467,658,566 or $60.1 million by metro. 491,259 awards and 478 committees are statewide. A county cut would be a different extract. Independent expenditures about Iowa candidates can be paid from elsewhere and sit in neither total.

Do not divide $115,467,658,566 by $60.1 million and call the result a return on donations. Do not divide awards by committees. Candidate committees are not award recipients in this join. Correlation is not causation.

Iowa citation block

USAspending.gov: $115,467,658,566; 491,259 awards. FEC.gov: $60.1 million; 478 committees; Democratic $36.5 million; Republican $23.5 million; other $39,047. Two sentences. Campaign contributions are not federal awards. 478 is a filing count, not a caucus turnout figure. 491,259 is an action count, not unique vendors.

Amended candidate reports move receipts; award restatements move obligations. Rewrite only the sentence whose source moved. Iowa federal spending and Iowa FEC totals are the live tables. Local procurement paid without a federal award sits outside the obligation extract. Independent expenditures about Iowa candidates can be paid from elsewhere and sit in neither total.

What a later Iowa ingest would change

A later USAspending file can restate $115,467,658,566 without touching $60.1 million. A later FEC bulk file can restate receipts without touching 491,259. Keep each change on its own source sentence. All spending ties does not hide a blended Iowa total under this slug.

Do not rank Iowa as more influential because a dense award file sits beside a large receipt book. Influence is not a field in this packet. The join is IA geography only. Caucus-calendar folklore remains outside both extracts unless it appears as an FEC filing or an award row. Keep 60.7% on the receipt sentence only.

Caucus-night maps are not a USAspending geography field. Keep Iowa’s award-action count labeled as a record count, including modifications. A researcher who wants both pictures keeps two tabs and does not add the totals.

Questions

Do Iowa campaign donations fund Iowa federal awards?
No. $60.1 million is FEC candidate receipts from 478 committees. $115,467,658,566 is USAspending obligations from 491,259 awards. A shared IA code is not a payment trail from donors to vendors. Original filings remain on FEC.gov and USAspending.gov.
Why is Iowa’s award count so high?
USAspending lists 491,259 award actions coded to Iowa totaling $115,467,658,566. The figure is a record count, including modifications and repeat actions, not a unique-vendor census. This packet does not explain the row volume beyond that definition.
How Democratic is Iowa’s federal candidate fundraising?
Democratic committees reported $36.5 million, or 60.7% of $60.1 million. Republican committees reported $23.5 million (39.2%). Other filers reported $39,047. Those shares describe 478 candidate committees, not award recipients on USAspending.gov. Original filings remain on the source sites.
Where are Iowa’s spending and FEC hubs?
Iowa federal spending on SpendingVault holds USAspending obligations. Iowa FEC totals on LobbyVault holds candidate receipts. All spending ties lists other state joins. If a later bulk file disagrees with this snapshot, the later extract controls. Original filings remain on the source sites.

Join of USAspending.gov state obligations with FEC.gov candidate receipts for the same state. These are different datasets — donations do not fund the obligations on this page.