Medical Assistance Program in Vermont At-Large District (VT-00)

VT-00 × 93.778 is a Medicaid join, not a caseload

This page is a join: Medical Assistance Program and Vermont At-Large District (VT-00). $2,874,547,868 is the obligation sum on awards that carry both the CFDA 93.778 tag and congressional-district place of performance VT-00. It is not Vermont’s statewide Medical Assistance Program book, not the nationwide program total, and not a state Medicaid appropriation or an FMAP scorecard. Vermont At-Large District is the district parent. CFDA 93.778 is the program parent. Correlation is not causation.

6 is an award-action count. Modifications can add rows. Unique recipients are unpublished, and this page will not invent contractors. Dividing $2,874,547,868 by 6 yields about $479,091,311.33 per award, a ratio of two packet facts, not a typical enrollee-year or a typical claim. FEC contribution tables do not fund these USAspending obligations. At-large geography means the House district covers the state. That does not turn this cell into Vermont’s entire federal book.

Medical Assistance as a catalog title, not a Vermont grade

The official catalog title is MEDICAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM. SpendingVault does not grade Vermont At-Large District (VT-00) on Medical Assistance Program, backlog, or policy. $2,874,547,868 is an obligation sum, not a verdict. CFDA 93.778 without the district filter is the national hub; this packet has no national total, so none is quoted. Medicare, CHIP, or SNAP remain outside $2,874,547,868.

CMS Medicaid Statistical Information System files and state Medicaid dashboards are other series. They are not the 6 awards on USAspending.gov. Mixing a census from those files with this join would invent a per-unit dollar figure the packet does not support. Green Mountain clinic and expansion-era folklore is ordinary speech, not a packet field. Medicare and CHIP are sibling overlays. This packet has no FMAP percentage.

Vermont At-Large besides CFDA 93.778

Vermont At-Large District (VT-00) is the geography side. Place of performance VT-00 is a coding field in the award file. It does not prove residency of beneficiaries, students, patients, or vendors. Vermont federal spending is the statewide parent and includes other districts. Montpelier did not cause the total by appearing as a capital. Burlington folklore is not a hospital census. Because VT-00 is at-large, the House geography covers Vermont. That still does not convert this cell into every CFDA coded to the state.

The district’s all-program obligation total is $17,839,249,310.25. $2,874,547,868 is the Medical Assistance Program slice of that book, about 16.1%. Remaining district dollars sit with other CFDAs on Vermont At-Large District, not inside this join. Quoting $2,874,547,868 as Vermont At-Large District (VT-00)’s entire federal book would drop every other catalog line.

Six awards, not six hospitals

6 awards against $2,874,547,868 implies about $479,091,311.33 per award. That mean is not a unit price and not a typical enrollee-year or a typical claim. Large federal-to-state Medicaid assistance vehicles can dominate dollars while the row count stays at 6. 6 rows can include continuations and amendments. Treat the count as records in an aggregate, not as 6 finished projects or 6 people. All spending ties lists other district-by-program pairs on the same obligation metric.

FMAP stories versus the obligation field in VT-00

An obligation is a recorded commitment. An outlay is a payment from the Treasury. $2,874,547,868 is the commitment figure. This packet has no outlay total and no fiscal-year split, so none is invented. Citing the figure as cash already spent in Vermont At-Large District (VT-00) over-reads the field. Do not rank Vermont At-Large District (VT-00) as a winner or loser versus other districts. Keep both sides in the citation: Medical Assistance Program (CFDA 93.778) and Vermont At-Large District (VT-00).

Budget documents from Montpelier and Vermont appropriations answer other questions. They are not the source of this cell. If a chart mixes General Fund activity with CFDA 93.778 in VT-00, the chart has left the federal award series. The Burlington area as speech only did not receive $2,874,547,868 as a named metro in this packet.

How to cite the 93.778 × VT-00 pair

Cite: Medical Assistance Program (CFDA 93.778) obligated $2,874,547,868 on 6 awards coded to Vermont At-Large District (VT-00), per USAspending.gov. Keep both keys. Keep the word obligations. Open Vermont At-Large District for the district rollup, CFDA 93.778 for the program rollup, Vermont federal spending for Vermont statewide spending, and All spending ties for other pairs. Later bulk files can move the dollars and the 6-award count; prefer those tables when the live overlay and this snapshot diverge. None of those links convert this cell into a state Medicaid appropriation or an FMAP scorecard, into outlays this packet omits, or into a contractor list.

Questions

How much Medical Assistance Program funding is obligated in Vermont At-Large District (VT-00)?

USAspending.gov records $2,874,547,868 in CFDA 93.778 obligations with Vermont At-Large District (VT-00) place of performance across 6 awards. That is a program × district join, not an outlay and not Vermont’s full federal total.

Do 6 awards mean 6 local enrollees?

No. 6 is an award-action count and can include modifications. Unique recipients are unpublished. Average obligation is about $479,091,311.33 per award, a ratio of two packet facts, not a typical enrollee-year or a typical claim.

Is this Vermont At-Large District (VT-00)’s entire federal spending total?

No. $2,874,547,868 is only the Medical Assistance Program slice tagged to Vermont At-Large District (VT-00), about 16.1% of the district’s $17,839,249,310.25 all-program total. Vermont federal spending is the statewide parent. Other CFDAs on Vermont At-Large District sit outside this join.

Where are the live VT-00 and CFDA 93.778 tables?

Vermont At-Large District is the district parent. CFDA 93.778 is the CFDA 93.778 hub. Vermont federal spending is the Vermont parent. All spending ties lists other pairs. Prefer those tables after later ingests; this page quotes 93.778 × VT-00 at $2,874,547,868.