Medicare Supplementary Medical Insurance in Texas 22nd District (TX-22)

TX-22 × 93.774 is a Part B join, not an enrollee census

This page is a join: Medicare Supplementary Medical Insurance and Texas 22nd District (TX-22). $567,535,531.27 is the obligation sum on awards that carry both the CFDA 93.774 tag and congressional-district place of performance TX-22. It is not Texas’s statewide Medicare Supplementary Medical Insurance book, not the nationwide program total, and not a hospital cost report or a Part A total. Texas 22nd District is the district parent. CFDA 93.774 is the program parent. Correlation is not causation.

9 is an award-action count. Modifications can add rows. Unique recipients are unpublished, and this page will not invent contractors. Dividing $567,535,531.27 by 9 yields about $63,059,503.47 per award, a ratio of two packet facts, not a typical Part B claim or a typical enrollee year. FEC contribution tables do not fund these USAspending obligations. A larger district share is arithmetic. This page does not rank TX-22 against VA-02.

Medicare Supplementary Medical Insurance as a catalog title

The official catalog title is MEDICARE SUPPLEMENTARY MEDICAL INSURANCE. SpendingVault does not grade Texas 22nd District (TX-22) on Medicare Supplementary Medical Insurance, backlog, or policy. $567,535,531.27 is an obligation sum, not a verdict. CFDA 93.774 without the district filter is the national hub; this packet has no national total, so none is quoted. Hospital Insurance (93.773) or Part D (93.770) remain outside $567,535,531.27.

CMS Medicare enrollment files, physician fee schedules, and MAC reports are other series. They are not the 9 awards on USAspending.gov. Mixing a census from those files with this join would invent a per-unit dollar figure the packet does not support. Part B, MAC, and physician-fee folklore is ordinary speech, not a packet field. VA disability compensation on 64.109 in TX-21 is a different Texas join in this slice. Mixing CMS Part B with VA compensation would invent a combined state total.

Texas 22nd District besides CFDA 93.774

Texas 22nd District (TX-22) is the geography side. Place of performance TX-22 is a coding field in the award file. It does not prove residency of beneficiaries, students, patients, or vendors. Texas federal spending is the statewide parent and includes other districts. Fort Bend–Brazoria speech is not a catchment map. Neighboring TX-09 Part B cells stay outside. A Medicare Supplementary Medical Insurance award tagged to TX-09 or TX-14 is not here.

The district’s all-program obligation total is $5,132,211,657.56. $567,535,531.27 is the Medicare Supplementary Medical Insurance slice of that book, about 11.1%. Remaining district dollars sit with other CFDAs on Texas 22nd District, not inside this join. Quoting $567,535,531.27 as Texas 22nd District (TX-22)’s entire federal book would drop every other catalog line.

Nine awards, not nine physician groups named here

9 awards against $567,535,531.27 implies about $63,059,503.47 per award. That mean is not a unit price and not a typical Part B claim or a typical enrollee year. Large assistance vehicles and modifications can dominate dollars while the row count stays at 9. 9 rows can include continuations and amendments. Treat the count as records in an aggregate, not as 9 finished projects or 9 people. All spending ties lists other district-by-program pairs on the same obligation metric.

Part B obligations versus claims already paid

An obligation is a recorded commitment. An outlay is a payment from the Treasury. $567,535,531.27 is the commitment figure. This packet has no outlay total and no fiscal-year split, so none is invented. Citing the figure as cash already spent in Texas 22nd District (TX-22) over-reads the field. Do not rank Texas 22nd District (TX-22) as a winner or loser versus other districts. Keep both sides in the citation: Medicare Supplementary Medical Insurance (CFDA 93.774) and Texas 22nd District (TX-22).

Budget documents from the Fort Bend–Brazoria fringe as speech only and Texas appropriations answer other questions. They are not the source of this cell. If a chart mixes General Fund activity with CFDA 93.774 in TX-22, the chart has left the federal award series. The southwest Houston suburbs as speech, not a packet metro did not receive $567,535,531.27 as a named metro in this packet.

How to cite the 93.774 × TX-22 cell

Cite: Medicare Supplementary Medical Insurance (CFDA 93.774) obligated $567,535,531.27 on 9 awards coded to Texas 22nd District (TX-22), per USAspending.gov. Keep both keys. Keep the word obligations. Open Texas 22nd District for the district rollup, CFDA 93.774 for the program rollup, Texas federal spending for Texas statewide spending, and All spending ties for other pairs. Later bulk files can move the dollars and the 9-award count; prefer those tables when the live overlay and this snapshot diverge. None of those links convert this cell into a hospital cost report or a Part A total, into outlays this packet omits, or into a contractor list.

Questions

How much Medicare Supplementary Medical Insurance funding is obligated in Texas 22nd District (TX-22)?

USAspending.gov records $567,535,531.27 in CFDA 93.774 obligations with Texas 22nd District (TX-22) place of performance across 9 awards. That is a program × district join, not an outlay and not Texas’s full federal total.

Do 9 awards mean 9 local enrollee, claim,s?

No. 9 is an award-action count and can include modifications. Unique recipients are unpublished. Average obligation is about $63,059,503.47 per award, a ratio of two packet facts, not a typical Part B claim or a typical enrollee year.

Is this Texas 22nd District (TX-22)’s entire federal spending total?

No. $567,535,531.27 is only the Medicare Supplementary Medical Insurance slice tagged to Texas 22nd District (TX-22), about 11.1% of the district’s $5,132,211,657.56 all-program total. Texas federal spending is the statewide parent. Other CFDAs on Texas 22nd District sit outside this join.

Is $567,535,531.27 cash already spent in Texas 22nd District (TX-22)?

No. Obligations are commitments recorded on USAspending.gov awards. Outlays are unpublished here. Treating $567,535,531.27 as checks already cleared in Texas 22nd District (TX-22) confuses those terms. Prefer Texas 22nd District if the live table moved.