New Mexico campaign finance next to federal obligations
USAspending.gov records $290,804,554,133.35 in federal obligations to New Mexico recipients across 85,196 awards. FEC.gov candidate committees tagged to New Mexico reported $18,926,775.67 in receipts across 347 filers. Award count (85,196) and committee count (347) are the smallest in this join family, while obligations still clear $290 billion. That combination — fewer rows, still-large dollars — is an award-mix fact, not a campaign-funding fact. Donations do not pay for the awards.
Key figures
- New Mexico USAspending obligations are $290,804,554,133.35 across 85,196 awards.
- New Mexico FEC candidate receipts are $18,926,775.67 across 347 committees.
- Award count and committee count are the smallest in this join family; obligations remain large.
- Democratic committees reported about 70.7% of FEC receipts; that share does not apply to awards.
- Donations do not fund the obligations on this page.
New Mexico’s small row count beside a large obligation total
The spending extract is $290,804,554,133.35 and 85,196 awards. The FEC extract is $18,926,775.67 and 347 candidate committees. Connecticut, earlier in this family, shows 169,224 awards against $507,565,382,911.38. New Mexico’s 85,196 against $290,804,554,133.35 is fewer actions still. A lower row count next to nine-figure-to-ten-figure dollars usually means a heavier mix of large actions in the extract. This packet does not publish an average, so none is quoted.
Open New Mexico federal spending for obligations. Open New Mexico FEC totals for receipts. All spending ties lists other pairs. NM is a shared code, not a payment trail.
USAspending.gov in New Mexico
The $290,804,554,133.35 total is obligations, not outlays. The 85,196 rows are award actions, including modifications. Repeat recipients add rows. National-laboratory and energy-related awards may sit in a state extract of this shape; this packet has no agency split, so none is invented.
New Mexico federal spending is the live award hub. It does not list FEC donors.
FEC.gov: 347 committees and a Democratic-committee majority
New Mexico candidate receipts are $18,926,775.67 from 347 committees — the smallest filing roster in this family, just below Connecticut’s 529. Democratic committees reported $13,379,373.76 (about 70.7%). Republican committees reported $5,321,453.77 (about 28.1%). Other and unaffiliated filers reported $225,948.14 (about 1.2%). About 70.7% is a share of a small receipt book. It is not a share of $290,804,554,133.35.
347 is a filing count, including primary challengers and residual committees. It is not Santa Fe’s state-office roster and not a contractor headcount. The 1.2% other share is thicker than Alabama’s remainder and thinner than Minnesota’s other line.
Few rows and few committees still do not merge the ledgers
Smaller counts can make a join look tidy. Tidy is not funded. Adding $18,926,775.67 to $290,804,554,133.35 invents a combined total. Mapping 70.7% Democratic onto 85,196 awards invents a party field. Treating receipts as a rounding error inside a low-row, high-dollar award file still mixes datasets.
Correlation is not causation. Different statutes, different filers.
How to cite New Mexico
Name USAspending.gov for $290,804,554,133.35 and 85,196 awards. Name FEC.gov for $18,926,775.67, 347 committees, Democratic $13,379,373.76, Republican $5,321,453.77, other $225,948.14. State-office campaigns file under New Mexico law and never enter either extract. Local procurement is outside USAspending.gov.
Independent expenditures are not extra packet facts. Live hubs: New Mexico federal spending and New Mexico FEC totals. All spending ties is the join index.
Santa Fe campaigns and local procurement stay off this join
New Mexico state-office campaigns file under New Mexico law. Those reports never enter $18,926,775.67 and never enter $290,804,554,133.35. Local procurement is outside USAspending.gov. Award count 85,196 and committee count 347 are the smallest in this family, while obligations still clear $290 billion. Fewer rows next to large dollars usually means a heavier mix of large actions. This packet does not publish an average, so none is quoted.
Independent expenditures are not extra packet facts. Democratic $13,379,373.76 (about 70.7%), Republican $5,321,453.77 (about 28.1%), and other $225,948.14 (about 1.2%) describe 347 committees. The 1.2% other share is thicker than Alabama’s remainder and thinner than Minnesota’s other line. Mapping 70.7% onto 85,196 awards invents a party field.
Cite USAspending.gov for $290,804,554,133.35 and 85,196 awards. Cite FEC.gov for $18,926,775.67 and 347 committees. New Mexico federal spending and New Mexico FEC totals are the live tables. All spending ties is the index. Donations do not fund the obligations.
Questions
- Do New Mexico campaign donations pay for federal awards?
- No. USAspending obligations of $290,804,554,133.35 and FEC receipts of $18,926,775.67 are different datasets joined only by state. Agencies record 85,196 awards as obligations. A shared NM code is not a funding path.
- How much federal spending is obligated in New Mexico?
- USAspending.gov records indexed here show $290,804,554,133.35 in obligations across 85,196 awards tagged to New Mexico. That figure is an obligation total, not an outlay series and not an FEC receipt total.
- How much have New Mexico federal candidates raised?
- FEC.gov aggregates show $18,926,775.67 in candidate receipts across 347 federal committees tagged to New Mexico. Democratic filers reported $13,379,373.76 (about 70.7%). Republican filers reported $5,321,453.77 (about 28.1%). That split does not describe awards.
- Why does New Mexico have fewer award rows than other states?
- This extract includes 85,196 award actions against $290,804,554,133.35. A lower row count next to a large dollar total can reflect fewer small assistance actions. The count is not explained by $18,926,775.67 in FEC receipts.
Join of USAspending.gov state obligations with FEC.gov candidate receipts for the same state. These are different datasets — donations do not fund the obligations on this page.