Nuclear Energy Research and Demonstration in Oregon

Eleven Oregon nuclear-energy R&D awards

Read Nuclear Energy Research, Development And Demonstration in Oregon as the filtered table; this page is the prose overlay for the same cell. Nuclear Energy Research, Development And Demonstration (CFDA 81.121) with Oregon place of performance sums to $270,169,351.62 on 11 awards. USAspending.gov is the source. The join is not a project, lab, or award-year census.

Implied mean obligation is about $24,560,850.15 ($270,169,351.62 ÷ 11). That ratio is not a typical demonstration project and not a typical lab year. DOE nuclear-energy research awards and modifications explain large dollars beside a limited row count. Recipients are unpublished.

Salem did not earn the sum by sitting on an OR tag. Matching 81.121 to Oregon is not a ranking. Awards tagged to Washington, Idaho, or California are other cells. Renewable energy (81.087), Office of Science, or NRC CFDAs stay outside $270,169,351.62 unless they also carry 81.121. FEC donations do not fund this USAspending cell. The overlay Nuclear Energy Research, Development And Demonstration in Oregon is the live table.

CFDA 81.121 without a reactor-project roster

Official catalog title: NUCLEAR ENERGY RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION. That string is catalog language. It does not grade Oregon's energy mix. The nationwide 81.121 page includes other geographies, so it is not this cell.

DOE NE award lists and university nuclear-engineering pages answer questions this packet cannot. Mixing those sources with the obligation sum would invent a combined total. Corvallis-lab folklore is not stored here. Renewable-energy (81.087) listings stay outside this cell unless they also carry 81.121.

Oregon's energy stack besides nuclear R&D

Oregon federal spending is the all-program parent. Oregon programs lists other catalogs beside 81.121. Quoting $270,169,351.62 as the state's complete federal footprint would drop every other line, including renewable energy (81.087), Office of Science, or NRC CFDAs.

Place of performance as Oregon locates tagged awards; it does not deposit the dollars in Salem's treasury. Corvallis is not a named recipient of $270,169,351.62. Portland folklore is not a metro split of the 11 awards.

Nuclear R&D obligations are not reactors already licensed

$270,169,351.62 remains an obligation aggregate. Outlays are unpublished. Drawdowns can lag. Cite the commitment field, not a cash story. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov for this 81.121 × OR pair.

Corvallis-versus-Portland folklore is not a split of the 11 awards. Unique recipients are unpublished. Do not invent a fiscal year. Keep the obligation label on $270,169,351.62. Do not treat a state appropriations chart as this cell unless it uses CFDA 81.121, Oregon geography, and the obligation metric.

How to cite the 81.121–Oregon pair

Cite: Nuclear Energy Research, Development And Demonstration (CFDA 81.121) obligated $270,169,351.62 on 11 awards coded to Oregon, per USAspending.gov. Keep both keys. Keep the word obligations. Internal links: Nuclear Energy Research, Development And Demonstration in Oregon, CFDA 81.121, Oregon federal spending, Oregon programs, and All spending ties.

Later bulk files can move the dollars and the 11-award count. Prefer the overlay Nuclear Energy Research, Development And Demonstration in Oregon when the live table and this snapshot diverge. CFDA 81.121, Oregon federal spending, Oregon programs, and All spending ties are parent hubs, not competing sums.

What eleven Oregon nuclear-energy rows cannot stretch into

A ties page will not rank Oregon against Washington, Idaho, or California. Peer Nuclear Energy R&D totals are not in these facts. 11 awards will not be recast as a project, lab, or award-year census. Correlation is not causation.

Keep Nuclear Energy Research, Development And Demonstration, Oregon, $270,169,351.62, and 11 awards together in every reuse. Place of performance as OR locates the tagged awards; it does not prove every dollar stayed inside Oregon after obligation. Salem folklore is not a split of the 11 awards, and Corvallis is not a named recipient of $270,169,351.62.

USAspending obligations can be positive new awards or net of downward modifications; $270,169,351.62 is the net total supplied in the facts. Treat 11 as a record count in an aggregate, not as 11 finished program years. Award modifications can sit beside base records in the same row count. The mean of about $24,560,850.15 per record will mislead anyone who treats it as a typical demonstration project and not a typical lab year.

Questions

How much Nuclear Energy R&D is obligated in Oregon?

USAspending.gov records $270,169,351.62 in CFDA 81.121 obligations across 11 awards coded to Oregon. That is a program × state join, not an outlay and not Oregon's full federal total. Keep both the program name and Oregon in any citation.

Do 11 awards mean 11 Oregon nuclear projects?

Award count is a row count. $270,169,351.62 ÷ 11 is about $24,560,850.15 per record as a mean, not a typical demonstration project and not a typical lab year. DOE nuclear-energy research awards and modifications can dominate dollars. This packet does not list recipients. See Nuclear Energy Research, Development And Demonstration in Oregon for the stored table.

Is this Oregon's entire Energy Department book?

No. The $270,169,351.62 and 11 awards are USAspending.gov obligation records for CFDA 81.121 with an Oregon geography tag. Renewable energy (81.087), Office of Science, or NRC CFDAs are separate joins. Those dollars sit outside this cell. Mixing those files with this join would invent a figure the packet does not support.

Where is the live Oregon × 81.121 overlay?

Nuclear Energy Research, Development And Demonstration in Oregon is the overlay. See Oregon federal spending, Oregon programs, CFDA 81.121, and All spending ties. Later bulk files override this snapshot. Keep the obligation label on $270,169,351.62. Do not invent a fiscal year.