Nuclear Energy Research, Development And Demonstration federal funding in Utah
Nuclear Energy Research, Development And Demonstration (CFDA 81.121) shows $236,868,318.02 in USAspending.gov obligations with Utah as place of performance. Ten awards carry that total. The join is a Energy listing crossed with a state location field, not Utah's entire budget and not a census of reactors or a count of laboratories. The dollars are commitments, not Treasury outlays.
Key figures
- CFDA 81.121 in Utah shows $236,868,318.02 in USAspending obligations on ten awards.
- Ten awards are R&D rows, not a reactor or laboratory census.
- The join is CFDA 81.121 plus place of performance, not Office of Science 81.049 dollars.
- The total is commitments, not completed demonstration work.
Utah x 81.121 is a nuclear R&D join, not a reactor census
This page pairs CFDA 81.121, NUCLEAR ENERGY RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION, with Utah place of performance. Nuclear Energy Research, Development and Demonstration, in program language, is a Department of Energy listing for nuclear R&D, demonstration, and related financial assistance. SpendingVault sums tagged obligations: $236,868,318.02 on ten awards. The extract does not list reactor projects, lab names, or demonstration milestones. Treat the pair as a catalog intersection, not a ranking of which state needs the program more, and not a claim that ten awards equal that many local offices.
Other DOE listings — Office of Science financial assistance on 81.049, or different nuclear-waste or energy codes — sit outside $236,868,318.02 unless they also carry 81.121. Mixing 81.121 with Office of Science or other DOE energy listings would invent a combined Energy Department figure the packet never computed. Correlation between this obligation sum and local need statistics is not causation. Those statistics are not in the packet. Place of performance as Utah locates the tagged awards; it does not deposit $236,868,318.02 in the state treasury, and it does not prove every dollar stayed inside Utah after subawards.
10 awards behind $236,868,318.02
Mean obligation is about $23.69 million if $236,868,318.02 were divided evenly across ten lines. That ratio is not a published grant size. Formula-style or project awards often post as a handful of large rows to a lead agency or a small set of recipients. Award count is a row count, including possible continuations. It is not a census of reactors or a count of laboratories.
Ten awards are scannable on the overlay. This page will not invent recipient names. Open Nuclear Energy Research, Development And Demonstration in Utah for the stored table. Do not convert ten awards into a map of Utah providers. The $236,868,318.02 total remains an obligation rollup on tagged awards. Inspect named lines rather than inferring an inventory.
Nuclear R&D obligations are not demonstration work already finished
Assistance awards often obligate to a state or recipient and draw as activities proceed. The $236,868,318.02 headline is the obligation sum, not a punch-list of research already completed and not a Treasury outlay total. No fiscal year is attached. An agency allocation table dated to a particular year is not automatically this join unless it uses CFDA 81.121, Utah geography, and the obligation metric.
The listing title is Nuclear Energy Research, Development And Demonstration. This extract does not split research from demonstration, and it does not name reactor designs. Those cuts would require award documentation beyond the packet facts. This page will not invent an activity-type share. A ten-award nuclear R&D file at this dollar scale is a concentrated research pattern. Do not convert ten rows into a map of Utah facilities. Place of performance as Utah locates the tagged awards; it does not prove every subcontract stayed in-state.
What the Utah 81.121 table omits
The extract has no reactor projects, lab names, or demonstration milestones. Facts remain $236,868,318.02, ten awards, CFDA 81.121, and Utah. This page will not invent a ranking against other states' 81.121 joins. Place-of-performance as a state code locates tagged awards; it does not by itself explain recipient type.
Utah federal spending and Utah programs place 81.121 among other listings. CFDA 81.121 is the national catalog line. All spending ties indexes other CFDA x state pairs. Mixing those shelves would invent a share of Energy spending the packet never computed. The $236,868,318.02 figure is the tagged pair only.
Where the 81.121 x Utah overlay lives
Start with Nuclear Energy Research, Development And Demonstration in Utah for the table behind $236,868,318.02. CFDA 81.121 is the nationwide listing. Utah federal spending and Utah programs give state context. All spending ties is the shelf for other program-by-state joins on the same obligation metric. Ten awards totaling $236,868,318.02 remain R&D assistance rows, not a reactor census. Reactor projects, lab names, or demonstration milestones are not in this packet. Outlays, remaining balances, and fiscal-year splits are omitted because they are not in the facts. Use the overlay for named award lines as USAspending stored them.
Questions
- How much Nuclear Energy Research, Development and Demonstration funding is obligated in Utah?
- USAspending.gov shows $236,868,318.02 in obligations for CFDA 81.121 with Utah as place of performance, across ten awards. The sum is a commitment total on assistance awards, not outlays and not the state's entire federal-spending total. Other Energy listings are outside this join unless they also carry 81.121.
- Do 10 awards mean 10 Utah reactors received grants?
- No. Award count is a row count of assistance awards and can include continuations. It is not a census of reactors or a count of laboratories. The packet does not name recipients. See the Utah 81.121 overlay for named lines as USAspending stored them.
- Is this Utah's entire Department of Energy spending?
- No. The join is CFDA 81.121 crossed with Utah place of performance. Related programs on other CFDA numbers are not inside $236,868,318.02 unless the award also carries 81.121. Mixing 81.121 with Office of Science or other DOE energy listings would invent a combined Energy Department figure the packet never computed.
- Is the 81.121 total already spent in Utah labs?
- Not on this metric. Obligations are recorded commitments on assistance awards. Outlays are payments from the Treasury. The $236,868,318.02 headline is the obligation rollup in SpendingVault's extract. Completed activity and remaining balances are not published in this packet.
USAspending.gov CFDA program aggregates by place of performance state. Obligations are not outlays.