Nuclear Regulatory Commission federal obligations in Texas
Two filters produce one cell: Nuclear Regulatory Commission as awarding agency 031 and Texas as geography. USAspending.gov publishes $51,468,332.79 and 159 awards for that pair. Neither filter alone is the number on this page. 159 awards against $51,468,332.79 is a mid-size award list rather than a handful of flagship vehicles. The implied mean is about $323,700.21 per award — a quotient of two packet facts, not a typical invoice. USAspending.gov is the source. Amounts are obligations, not outlays.
Key figures
- USAspending cell: Nuclear Regulatory Commission × Texas = $51,468,332.79.
- 159 records, about $323,700.21 each as a mean.
- Outlays and fiscal-year splits are unpublished here.
- No fiscal year is in the facts for $51,468,332.79.
- No contractor names in this packet; geography is statewide Texas.
Both keys, one total: 031 and TX
Drop the Texas filter and $51,468,332.79 is no longer this page. Drop the Nuclear Regulatory Commission filter and $51,468,332.79 is no longer this page. The join is the product of both keys on USAspending.gov. A Nuclear Regulatory Commission award coded outside TX is out. An award in Texas from a different awarding agency is out even if the topic sounds related. Texas (TX) excludes New Mexico, Oklahoma, Arkansas, and Louisiana.
159 award actions sit under $51,468,332.79. That count is a mid-size award list rather than a handful of flagship vehicles. It is not a roster of grantees. Treating the cell as a plant-by-plant license census or a named-reactor list over-reads the extract. Unique recipients are unpublished. Modifications can add rows without adding new vendors.
Open Nuclear Regulatory Commission in Texas for the filtered table, Texas federal spending for the next hub, Nuclear Regulatory Commission for the remaining hub, and All spending ties for other pairs.
A mean of $323,700.21 without a distribution
Arithmetic is allowed: $51,468,332.79 ÷ 159 ≈ $323,700.21. Interpretation as a typical Nuclear Regulatory Commission award is not allowed, because the packet has no median, no quartiles, and no award-type split. The 159 figure is not a count of distinct programs.
Austin, houston, dallas, and the gulf coast may be reader landmarks, not published subtotals. Texas is statewide; the packet does not split Gulf Coast from Panhandle place of performance. Those place names are folklore paths for search, unused as math.
Texas federal spending is the wider state book
Texas federal spending includes every awarding agency tagged to Texas. Nuclear Regulatory Commission includes every geography tagged to Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Nuclear Regulatory Commission in Texas is the overlap that produced $51,468,332.79.
Sibling overlays for agency 031 in other states are not remainders of this cell. This packet has no national Nuclear Regulatory Commission total to subtract from. Do not subtract $51,468,332.79 from Nuclear Regulatory Commission and call the difference 'Texas versus everywhere else' without a published national total in this packet — there is none.
What the source note actually says
USAspending.gov aggregate of federal obligations by state and awarding agency. Obligations are not outlays. That sentence is the unit rule for every reuse of this page.
No fiscal year is in the facts. Inventing one would be a packet violation. Keep $51,468,332.79 unlabeled by FY until a later extract supplies one. Citing $51,468,332.79 as cash already sent in Texas confuses obligations with outlays.
Texas outcomes are not proven by $51,468,332.79
Correlation is not causation. $51,468,332.79 does not prove that Nuclear Regulatory Commission activity caused Texas economic results, and Texas results do not prove why the cell equals $51,468,332.79.
FEC donations do not fund this USAspending cell. Keep campaign-finance files on their own site. Keep $51,468,332.79 on USAspending.gov. Population and outcome scores are not packet facts.
Verify $51,468,332.79 on the live overlay
The four allowed hrefs are /states/tx/agencies/031/, the Texas hub, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission hub, and /ties/. Anchors: Nuclear Regulatory Commission in Texas; Texas federal spending; Nuclear Regulatory Commission; All spending ties.
Place-of-performance Texas is statewide; Texas is statewide; the packet does not split Gulf Coast from Panhandle place of performance. Neighbor-coded activity in New Mexico, Oklahoma, Arkansas, and Louisiana stays out. Correlation is not causation. Treating the join as a plant-by-plant license census or a named-reactor list is labeled folklore here because the packet has no NAICS, CFDA, or program column. Austin, houston, dallas, and the gulf coast folklore is the same kind of reader path: useful for search, unused as math. Agency 031 on a different state's overlay is a sibling join, not a remainder that must add to a national Nuclear Regulatory Commission budget on this page. Texas's $51,468,332.79 cell stands alone. Nuclear Regulatory Commission is the awarding-agency label stored on the Texas overlay; the numeric key is 031. Readers who only remember the short name Nuclear Regulatory Commission still need both the state tag and the agency tag before quoting $51,468,332.79. The 159 figure is not a count of grantees and is not a count of distinct programs. That is another reason the mean of about $323,700.21 is not a typical Nuclear Regulatory Commission award. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov. This file copies overlayTarget /states/tx/agencies/031/ and canonicalPath /ties/nuclear-regulatory-commission-in-texas/ from the packet. It does not add a fiscal year, a contractor, or an FEC dollar. If the live overlay later disagrees with $51,468,332.79 or 159, trust the table and treat this prose as dated to the extract. Until then, the reusable facts are $51,468,332.79, 159 awards, agency 031, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Texas (TX), and the obligation unit. All spending ties is an index of joins, not a hidden total that already includes $51,468,332.79. Nuclear Regulatory Commission in Texas remains the place to verify the live rows. Repeat the pair before any reuse: Nuclear Regulatory Commission in Texas. Repeat the source: USAspending.gov. Repeat the unit: obligations, not outlays. The overlay path /states/tx/agencies/031/ and the canonical path /ties/nuclear-regulatory-commission-in-texas/ describe the same join. Internal links stay limited to the four packet hrefs. No other URL is added. No recipient, contractor, or donor name is invented to fill space. The facts remain the dollar total, the award count, the agency code, the agency name, the state name, and the state code.
Questions
- What USAspending total pairs Nuclear Regulatory Commission with Texas?
- USAspending.gov records $51,468,332.79 in obligations for awarding agency 031 (Nuclear Regulatory Commission) with Texas place of performance, covering 159 awards. That is an obligation total, not an outlay total, and not Nuclear Regulatory Commission's nationwide budget. The pair is a join, not a ranking.
- Why is $323,700.21 not a typical Texas Nuclear Regulatory Commission award?
- The extract lists 159 award actions totaling $51,468,332.79. Average obligation per award is about $323,700.21, a ratio of two packet facts, not a typical invoice. Unique grantees are not published here. Original filings remain on the source sites.
- Does the Texas Nuclear Regulatory Commission join include New Mexico?
- No. $51,468,332.79 and 159 awards are statewide Texas place of performance. Texas is statewide; the packet does not split Gulf Coast from Panhandle place of performance. Awards coded to New Mexico, Oklahoma, Arkansas, and Louisiana are outside this cell. The geography key remains TX.
- What URL is the Nuclear Regulatory Commission × Texas overlay?
- Nuclear Regulatory Commission in Texas is the overlay. Texas federal spending shows all agencies in the state. Nuclear Regulatory Commission shows agency 031 without a state filter. All spending ties lists other pairs. Original filings remain on the source sites.
USAspending.gov aggregate of federal obligations by state and awarding agency. Obligations are not outlays.