Skip to main content
← All data ties

Opioid STR funding in Massachusetts 8th District (MA-08)

Place-of-performance MA-08 crossed with Opioid Str (CFDA 93.788) yields $352,254,069.05 in USAspending.gov obligations on 3 awards. Three Opioid STR awards equal about 3.2% of MA-08’s $10.97 billion district book — a thin 93.788 file, not a clinic census. That pair is Opioid Str and Massachusetts 8th District (MA-08) — not Massachusetts’s entire federal inflow, not Opioid Str nationwide, and not cash already paid. The cell is 3.2% of this district’s published obligation total ($10,968,461,073.57). Implied average obligation is about $117,418,023.02 ($352,254,069.05 ÷ 3). Correlation is not causation.

Key figures

  • Opioid STR in Massachusetts 8th District (MA-08): $352,254,069.05 across 3 USAspending awards.
  • Implied mean about $117,418,023.02 per record; district share 3.2% of $10,968,461,073.57.
  • CFDA 93.788 × MA-08 is an obligation join, not an outlay and not a named-recipient list.
  • Cite USAspending.gov; quote Massachusetts 8th District and CFDA 93.788 if live tables moved.
  • Massachusetts federal spending and All spending ties are parents and an index, not amounts to add into $352,254,069.05.

How Massachusetts 8th District (MA-08) filters Opioid STR

CFDA 93.788 and congressional district MA-08 meet here. $352,254,069.05 is the USAspending.gov obligation sum on awards that carry both tags. It is not Opioid Str’s nationwide total, not every federal dollar coded to Massachusetts 8th District (MA-08), and not an outlay register. The packet does not split prevention from treatment uses and does not name providers. 3 is an action count: modifications and repeat awards add rows. Unique recipients are unpublished. It is not a patient census, a clinic roster, or a named-grantee file.

Dividing $352,254,069.05 by 3 yields about $117,418,023.02 per award on average. That ratio is two packet facts. It is not a typical state award or a posted per-patient figure. 3 awards against a $352.3 million Opioid STR cell is a thin file. Concentration pulls the implied mean up. Providers remain unpublished. Do not treat MA-08’s 93.788 cell as a synonym for every Opioid STR account nationwide. Open Massachusetts 8th District for the district table without this program filter, CFDA 93.788 for CFDA 93.788 without the MA-08 filter, Massachusetts federal spending for every program in the Massachusetts extract, and All spending ties for the rest of the join list. Quote those hubs as parents, not as addends to $352,254,069.05.

The Opioid STR assistance line

USAspending labels CFDA 93.788 as Opioid Str. That catalog number produced $352,254,069.05 when crossed with Massachusetts 8th District (MA-08) place of performance. The program-wide 93.788 hub does not require MA-08 geography. The district hub does not require Opioid STR. Only this tie applies both filters, which is why it cites 3 awards. The packet does not split prevention from treatment uses and does not name providers.

Correlation is not causation: Massachusetts 8th District (MA-08) did not “cause” $352,254,069.05 by existing as a large or small place. Population, outcome scores, and named facilities are not packet facts. The join is 93.788 × MA-08 only. It is not a patient census, a clinic roster, or a named-grantee file. Do not invent contractors or award recipients to fill the gap. Campaign donations on FEC tables do not fund this USAspending cell; the datasets are separate.

Reading the MA-08 congressional stamp

Massachusetts 8th District (MA-08) on this join is a USAspending geography field, not a claim that every dollar was disbursed to residents of that district. Awards can list MA-08 while later work occurs elsewhere. Awards tagged to other Massachusetts districts belong on those ties even when the CFDA is also 93.788. Massachusetts 8th District (MA-08) is a numbered congressional place-of-performance code inside Massachusetts. Other Massachusetts districts are separate joins even when they reuse CFDA 93.788. Massachusetts 8th District (MA-08) is the Massachusetts geography on this Opioid STR join. Connecticut 3rd hosts addiction research (CFDA 93.279), a different catalog.

Massachusetts federal spending shows how CFDA 93.788 sits beside other programs in the same state extract. $352,254,069.05 is one district-program column, not the state table. This packet does not split Massachusetts 8th District (MA-08) by county, city, or census tract. Awards that carry a different CFDA stay on those other ties even if the work sounds related to Opioid Str. The district-wide obligation total published here is $10,968,461,073.57; $352,254,069.05 is the Opioid STR slice of that denominator.

USAspending obligation math on this pair

USAspending.gov records an obligation when the federal government commits funds on an award. $352,254,069.05 is that kind of sum for Opioid Str inside MA-08 coding. Later deobligations, recoveries, or payment schedules can change what leaves the Treasury without this join rewriting itself into a cash register. Assistance and contract awards can share the same CFDA rollup; this packet does not split them. Net obligations can include downward adjustments. This page reports $352,254,069.05 as given.

Massachusetts’s own budget is a separate ledger. Mixing it with the 3-row Opioid STR cell leaves USAspending.gov. Treat 3 as award records in the aggregate, not unique vendors. 3 is not a count of clinics, patients, or grantees. Do not annualize without a year field in the packet. Do not per-capita or per-recipient the dollar total; those denominators are unpublished. The implied mean ($117,418,023.02) is a concentration statistic, not a typical state award or a posted per-patient figure.

Citing $352,254,069.05 without dropping a join side

Cite USAspending.gov: Opioid Str (CFDA 93.788) obligated $352,254,069.05 on 3 awards coded to Massachusetts 8th District (MA-08). Name Opioid Str and Massachusetts 8th District (MA-08) together. Keep the obligation word. If Massachusetts 8th District or CFDA 93.788 has refreshed, prefer the live hub over this snapshot for current rows. The pair is not a patient census, a clinic roster, or a named-grantee file. 3.2% of $10,968,461,073.57 is the district share on this packet, not a performance score. Addiction research (93.279) and mental-health research grants (93.242) are NIH research catalogs. Opioid STR (93.788) is a separate HHS line. Do not merge them.

Row count versus dollar concentration on Opioid STR

3 awards against a $352.3 million Opioid STR cell is a thin file. Concentration pulls the implied mean up. Providers remain unpublished. A large row count makes a project split tempting; the packet still does not supply one. A small row count makes a named-facility story tempting; the packet still does not name facilities or contractors. The implied mean (about $117,418,023.02) and the district share (3.2% of $10,968,461,073.57) are ratios of packet facts. Prefer Massachusetts 8th District and CFDA 93.788 if the live tables moved.

Questions

How much Opioid STR spending is coded to Massachusetts 8th District (MA-08)?
USAspending.gov lists $352,254,069.05 in Opioid Str obligations across 3 awards with place of performance in Massachusetts 8th District (MA-08). CFDA 93.788 × MA-08 is an obligation join, not an outlay and not Massachusetts’s complete federal ledger. The cell is 3.2% of the district’s published total ($10,968,461,073.57). Unique recipients are unpublished. Average obligation is about $117,418,023.02, a ratio of those two facts only.
Does $352,254,069.05 include every Opioid STR project in MA-08?
The packet publishes one CFDA rollup. The packet does not split prevention from treatment uses and does not name providers. $352,254,069.05 is the combined obligation sum for CFDA 93.788 inside MA-08 coding. This page will not invent a project pie or name contractors. Open CFDA 93.788 and Massachusetts 8th District to inspect parent tables. 3 remains an action count, not a count of clinics, patients, or grantees.
Is $352,254,069.05 cash already paid in Massachusetts 8th District (MA-08)?
No. Obligations are commitments recorded on USAspending.gov awards. Outlays — money that actually left the Treasury — are a different concept and are not this packet’s headline. Treating $352,254,069.05 as checks already cleared in Massachusetts 8th District (MA-08) confuses those terms. Later ingests can revise 3 awards. Prefer the live district and program hubs if the tables moved.
Why is the implied average $117,418,023.02 not a typical award?
The average is $352,254,069.05 divided by 3 awards, about $117,418,023.02. Thick files pull the mean down; thin files pull it up. Neither case publishes a typical instrument. Modifications add rows. Recipients are unpublished. Use the ratio only as a concentration statistic.

USAspending.gov congressional district place-of-performance joined to CFDA program. Obligations are not outlays.