Other Computer Related Services federal obligations in Ohio
USAspending.gov records $375,737,157.20 in Other Computer Related Services (NAICS 541519) obligations with Ohio place of performance, across 2,444 awards. That pair is an industry code crossed with a geography filter, not a national other computer related services budget. Average obligation per award is about $153,739 — a ratio of two packet facts, not a typical IT task order.
Key figures
- NAICS 541519 in Ohio: $375,737,157.20 across 2,444 awards.
- Average obligation per award is about $153,739.
- The total is obligations, not outlays, and not nationwide other computer related services.
- OH is place of performance, not a plant-only split.
What NAICS 541519 and Ohio share on one row
NAICS 541519 and place-of-performance state OH meet here. $375,737,157.20 is the obligation sum on awards that carry both tags. It is not every federal award in Ohio, not the nationwide Other Computer Related Services total, and not cash already paid. Ohio it-services folklore and statewide other computer related services stories may send a reader here. Those stories are not a plant list and not a IT-service actions census. NAICS 541519 is other computer related services, not computer systems design (541512) and not custom programming (541511).
2,444 award actions sit behind that dollar figure — thousands of rows beside $375,737,157.20. Thick books often mix small orders with larger vehicles. The join does not rank Ohio against other states and does not name vendors, facilities, or IT-service actions inside the extract. Unique recipients are unpublished on this page.
Open Ohio federal spending for the statewide table, NAICS 541519 for the industry hub without a Ohio filter, Ohio industries for other Ohio industry cells, and All spending ties for other pairs. Do not add those parent pages into $375,737,157.20.
Other computer-services awards under an Ohio filter
Dividing $375,737,157.20 by 2,444 yields about $153,739 per award on average. That average hides contracts, grants, and other instruments. It is not a typical IT task order. A second 541519 slice on another state uses the same NAICS code and a different dollar total. Do not treat Ohio's 541519 total as a synonym for every federal other computer related services purchase. Ohio it-services folklore is a coding conversation, not a packet field.
Recipient rows live on the industry and state hubs, not in this narrative's extra columns. 2,444 is an award-record count, including modifications, not a count of IT-service actions and not a unique-firm census. Keep 541519 and OH as the join key even when a later USAspending ingest restates $375,737,157.20.
NAICS 541519 without a Ohio overlay is a different total
The NAICS 541519 page aggregates NAICS 541519 without requiring OH geography. The Ohio federal spending page aggregates all agencies and industries with Ohio place of performance. Ohio industries lists other industry cells in the same state. Only this tie applies both the 541519 filter and the OH filter, which is why it cites 2,444 awards and $375,737,157.20.
Place of performance in Ohio is a USAspending geography field. Awards can list OH while work occurs in Indiana or Pennsylvania. 541519 awards coded to those states do not sit in this total even if a vendor's mailroom is in Columbus. This packet does not split Columbus, Cleveland, or Dayton. Place of performance is a tag, not proof that every IT-service action stayed inside Ohio.
Obligations, not outlays
An obligation is a legal commitment. An outlay is a payment. $375,737,157.20 is the former. This packet has no outlay total, no fiscal-year split, and no de-obligation history. Citing the figure as money already spent in Ohio over-reads the field. Award count 2,444 is a record count, not a payment count.
Readers who need transaction-level detail should use Ohio federal spending, NAICS 541519, and Ohio industries. All spending ties does not hide a blended statewide total under this slug. Keep the obligation label on $375,737,157.20 in every reuse.
What this Ohio–541519 pair does not prove
A other computer related services total in Ohio does not mean the industry caused Ohio's industrial mix, and it does not connect these obligations to campaign contributions. Correlation between plant geography and other computer related services awards is expected; it is not a finding about readiness, waste, or local employment. FEC individual contributions are a different dataset.
Keep $375,737,157.20 labeled as NAICS 541519 obligations with Ohio place of performance. An industry name that appears near a donor occupation is a coincidence of labeling, not a cash pipeline into USAspending. Ohio federal spending still includes other NAICS codes that must not be folded into this cell.
How to cite the Ohio–541519 pair
A clean footnote names NAICS 541519 (Other Computer Related Services), Ohio place of performance, $375,737,157.20 in obligations, and 2,444 awards on USAspending.gov. Keep the obligation word. Do not call $375,737,157.20 cash outlays. Mean dollars per action remain about $153,739 if you divide those two facts — a ratio, not a typical IT task order. Ohio federal spending, NAICS 541519, Ohio industries, and All spending ties keep the same unit.
A later ingest can restate $375,737,157.20 without changing the join of 541519 and OH. Rewrite only the sentence whose source moved. Columbus-versus-Cleveland folklore is not a metro split in this packet. Do not treat 2,444 as a unique-firm census. Unique recipients are not published here. Keep NAICS 541519 and OH as the join key. Those stories are not a plant list and not a IT-service actions census. Correlation is not causation.
Readers who reuse Ohio other computer services | $375.7M should keep both sides of the join in the same sentence, cite USAspending.gov as the source, and treat award rows as records rather than unique vendors. The live hubs linked from this page can refresh the snapshot; this narrative does not invent a fiscal year, a recipient list, or an outlay total that the packet omitted. Place of performance remains a geography tag, not proof that work stayed inside Ohio. NAICS 541519 without the OH filter is a different total on NAICS 541519. Statewide spending without the 541519 filter is a different total on Ohio federal spending. Ohio industries keeps sibling Ohio codes unmerged. All spending ties indexes other pairs. Quote 2,444 awards and $375,737,157.20 together whenever the other computer related services cell in Ohio is cited.
Questions
- How much has NAICS 541519 obligated in Ohio?
- USAspending.gov records $375,737,157.20 in obligations for NAICS 541519 with Ohio place of performance, covering 2,444 awards. That is an obligation total, not an outlay total, and not the nationwide Other Computer Related Services total. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov.
- Is this every other computer related services dollar in Ohio?
- No. NAICS 541519 is other computer related services, not computer systems design (541512) and not custom programming (541511). $375,737,157.20 covers 2,444 awards with Ohio place of performance under that code. Sibling codes have their own industry pages. Quote 541519 and Ohio together.
- Does this include Indiana or Pennsylvania other computer related services awards?
- No. $375,737,157.20 and 2,444 describe Ohio place of performance only. Awards coded to Indiana or Pennsylvania do not enter this sum even if a vendor's mailroom sits in Columbus. Keep the Ohio geography tag on the citation. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov.
- Where are the live Ohio and NAICS 541519 tables?
- Ohio federal spending shows statewide spending. NAICS 541519 shows NAICS 541519 without a state filter. Ohio industries lists other Ohio industry cells. All spending ties lists other pairs. This page is the join of those two filters, not a restatement of either hub.
USAspending.gov NAICS industry aggregates by place of performance state. Obligations are not outlays.