Other Scientific And Technical Consulting Services federal obligations in Vermont (NAICS 541690)

NAICS 541690 and Vermont as a scientific-consulting join

This page intersects one six-digit industry and one state. $16,312,783.27 is the obligation sum where both filters are true. NAICS 541690 is other scientific and technical consulting services, not environmental consulting and not residual professional, scientific, and technical services. It is not a statewide spending total and not a national NAICS 541690 total. Those parent tables live on /states/vt/ and /industries/541690/.

31 awards against about $16.3 million is a mid-file scientific-consulting cell, not a single task-order vehicle. 31 is an award-record count. Modifications can sit beside base awards. The packet does not say how many unique vendors produced the 31 lines. Reading 31 as factories, ships, or clinics in Vermont would confuse actions with establishments.

Vermont industries (/states/vt/industries/) lists other NAICS codes with VT place of performance. All spending ties (/ties/) indexes other state–industry pairs. Do not sum those indexes into $16,312,783.27. The headline remains $16,312,783.27 on 31 awards for this pair alone.

Scientific consulting, not environmental consulting

NAICS 541690 is a Census industry code assigned on the award. NAICS 541690 is other scientific and technical consulting services, not environmental consulting and not residual professional, scientific, and technical services. Environmental consulting (541620) and residual PST services (541990) are different industry pages even when they share a Vermont tag. Those neighboring codes never enter $16,312,783.27 unless they also appear as 541690, which they do not. Keep the six-digit label when you cite the Vermont cell.

Other scientific consulting is a residual professional-services label. This extract does not name disciplines, firms, or primes. Dividing $16,312,783.27 by 31 produces about $526,219. That quotient is arithmetic, not a typical Vermont contract. There is no median, no top-award table, and no fiscal-year breakout on this packet. Do not treat the mean as a posted unit price.

Vermont geography on a 541690 cell

Vermont place of performance can cover Burlington, Montpelier, White River Junction, or a reporting address. The packet has no metro split. Inside the VT tag, Burlington, Montpelier, or a named consulting office are not broken out. The packet has one state key. A named city can sit inside $16,312,783.27 only if its awards carry NAICS 541690 and VT — which this narrative cannot verify.

Place-of-performance geography is not the same as contractor headquarters. A firm based elsewhere can perform in Vermont, and a Vermont address can appear on work done out of state. This join reports the coded pair, not a logistics map. /states/vt/ remains the statewide parent.

Obligations versus outlays for Vermont 541690

USAspending obligations are commitments, not checks that have cleared. $16,312,783.27 can include amounts that will be paid later, cancelled, or modified. The packet does not publish outlays. 31 is not a payment count. Quote NAICS 541690 in Vermont as obligations and leave fiscal-year folklore off the citation — years are unpublished here.

What the scientific-consulting–Vermont pair does not prove

The scientific and technical consulting–Vermont pair does not prove that Vermont specialized in this industry because of federal demand, or the reverse. Other scientific consulting is a residual professional-services label. This extract does not name disciplines, firms, or primes. Campaign-finance tables are a different dataset; donations do not fund these awards. Keep both sides of the join in any headline: NAICS 541690 and Vermont.

How to cite NAICS 541690 in Vermont

Cite USAspending.gov, NAICS 541690 (Other Scientific And Technical Consulting Services), Vermont (VT), $16,312,783.27, and 31 awards. Note that the figures are obligations. Point readers to /states/vt/, /industries/541690/, /states/vt/industries/, and /ties/ rather than collapsing those pages into this cell. Mean per award stays about $526,219 as a ratio only. Readers who reuse VT scientific consulting (541690) | $16.3M should keep both sides of the join in the same sentence, cite USAspending.gov as the source, and treat award rows as records rather than unique vendors. The live hubs linked from this page can refresh the snapshot; this narrative does not invent a fiscal year, a recipient list, or an outlay total that the packet omitted. Place of performance remains a geography tag, not proof that work stayed inside the named state.

Questions

How much has NAICS 541690 obligated in Vermont?

The pair totals $16,312,783.27 across 31 awards, per USAspending.gov NAICS industry aggregates by place of performance state. Those are obligations for Other Scientific And Technical Consulting Services inside Vermont coding, not outlays and not every federal dollar in Vermont.

Are 31 awards a Vermont consulting-firm count?

31 award records produced $16,312,783.27. Concentration or dispersion is visible only as that count against that sum. About $526,219 per award is $16,312,783.27 divided by 31, not a typical Vermont purchase. The packet does not list unique recipients or a median award.

Does this include Vermont environmental consulting?

No. $16,312,783.27 is NAICS 541690 — other scientific and technical consulting services — with Vermont place of performance on 31 awards. Environmental consulting uses 541620. Quote 541690 and Vermont together. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov. Keep both sides of the join in the citation.

Where are the parent Vermont and NAICS 541690 tables?

Use /states/vt/ for the statewide industry mix, /industries/541690/ for the national industry page, /states/vt/industries/ for the state NAICS index, and /ties/ for other joins. This page quotes only the 541690 × VT cell. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov.