Paint And Coating Manufacturing federal obligations in Utah (NAICS 325510)
Forty-eight paint-and-coating manufacturing awards in Utah carry $30,216,737.49. USAspending.gov codes those actions to NAICS 325510 and Utah place of performance. 48 awards against that dollar total imply about $629,515 per award. The pair is a chemical-product manufacturing code plus Utah geography, not explosives manufacturing, not irradiation apparatus, and not Utah’s entire industrial book.
Key figures
- NAICS 325510 in Utah: $30,216,737.49 across 48 awards.
- Average obligation per award is about $629,515.
- 325510 is paint and coating manufacturing, not consulting or apparatus.
- The total is obligations, not outlays; UT is place of performance.
Utah and NAICS 325510 as a coatings join
This page intersects paint and coating manufacturing and Utah place of performance. $30,216,737.49 is the obligation sum where both filters are true. NAICS 325510 is paint and coating manufacturing, not explosives (325920) and not a residual chemical dump. It is not Utah’s statewide spending total and not a national 325510 total. Those parent tables live on Utah federal spending and NAICS 325510.
48 is an award-record count. Modifications can sit beside base awards. The packet does not name formulations, plants, or primes. Reading 48 as the number of paint factories in Utah would confuse actions with establishments.
Utah industries lists other NAICS codes with UT place of performance. All spending ties indexes other state–industry pairs. Do not sum those indexes into $30,216,737.49.
Coatings manufacturing, not consulting or apparatus
USAspending labels NAICS 325510 as Paint And Coating Manufacturing. Utah also has 541611, 334517, 524292, and 541513 overlays on this slice; those codes are not rolled into $30,216,737.49. The industry hub for NAICS 325510 does not require Utah.
The packet names no product lines or customers. Award titles on the NAICS 325510 page are the place to see what a given line bought. Do not treat the overlay as a statewide chemical-plant census.
Place of performance in Utah
Utah on this join is a geography field, not a Salt Lake County-only overlay. Place of performance can list UT while later work occurs in Idaho, Nevada, or Colorado; those states are not inside this total unless also coded UT. The packet does not split counties.
The state hub for Utah shows how 325510 sits beside other industries with UT place of performance. Awards can list Utah while headquarters sit elsewhere.
48 awards and a large mean
Dividing $30,216,737.49 by 48 yields about $629,515 per award on average. That ratio is packet arithmetic, not a typical drum price. Award count 48 is a record count, not a payment count. Readers who need transaction-level detail should use Utah industries and the NAICS 325510 hub.
An obligation is a legal commitment. $30,216,737.49 is that kind of sum. This packet has no outlay total and no fiscal-year split. Citing the figure as cash already spent in Utah over-reads the field.
What this pair does not prove
A paint-manufacturing NAICS plus Utah is not an environmental ranking or a claim that campaign contributions funded the awards. FEC filings and USAspending awards are different datasets. Keep $30,216,737.49 labeled as NAICS 325510 obligations with Utah place of performance.
A later ingest can restate the dollars or the 48 count without changing the join key of NAICS 325510 and UT. Correlation is not causation.
Utah paint manufacturing versus Utah services and Connecticut explosives
Utah 325510 is paint and coating manufacturing: 48 awards and $30,216,737.49. Connecticut 325920 is explosives manufacturing, a different 325-series code in a different state. Utah consulting, facilities management, apparatus, and PBM overlays are not coatings. Do not fold those Utah service dollars into $30,216,737.49.
Utah federal spending, NAICS 325510, Utah industries, and All spending ties are the four hubs. The mean of about $629,515 is packet arithmetic, not a drum price. The packet names no formulations. Place of performance is Utah statewide. Campaign contributions remain a different dataset.
Readers who only need the headline can stop at NAICS 325510 in Utah: $30,216,737.49 across 48 awards. The rest of this page exists to keep that headline attached to both join sides, to the obligation-versus-outlay distinction, and to the four internal hubs listed above. Nothing in the packet supports a contractor roster, a fiscal-year split, or a claim that campaign donations funded these USAspending obligations.
Utah’s 325510 cell is paint and coating manufacturing. 48 awards and $30,216,737.49 are coatings-code actions, not explosives manufacturing and not Utah consulting. Formulations are unpublished. Utah federal spending and NAICS 325510 remain the parent tables.
Questions
- How much has NAICS 325510 obligated in Utah?
- USAspending.gov records $30,216,737.49 in obligations for NAICS 325510 (Paint And Coating Manufacturing) with Utah place of performance, covering 48 awards. That is an obligation total, not an outlay total, and not the nationwide paint-and-coating figure. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov.
- Is this the same as explosives manufacturing?
- No. This join is NAICS 325510. Explosives manufacturing is NAICS 325920, a different 325-series code (used on a Connecticut overlay on this slice, not Utah). The $30,216,737.49 and 48 awards here do not absorb explosives NAICS. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov.
- Is 48 the number of paint plants in Utah?
- No. The extract lists 48 awards totaling $30,216,737.49. Modifications can multiply rows. Unique vendors are not published in this packet. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov.
- Where is the live paint and coating–Utah table?
- Utah federal spending is the state rollup. NAICS 325510 is the industry hub without a state filter. Utah industries lists other NAICS in Utah. All spending ties lists other pairs. The $30,216,737.49 and 48 awards are the 325510×UT join only. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov.
USAspending.gov NAICS industry aggregates by place of performance state. Obligations are not outlays.