Partnerships For Climate-Smart Commodities in Idaho

One climate-smart partnership award tagged to Idaho

Two tables meet: CFDA 10.937 (Partnerships For Climate-Smart Commodities) and Idaho (ID) as place of performance. Their intersection is $59,144,250 on 1 USAspending.gov awards. The join is not a farm, partnership, or acre census. Awards coded to Washington, Oregon, or Montana stay outside this cell even if activity later crosses those lines.

Large partnership awards can hold most of $59,144,250 while the count remains 1. Dividing $59,144,250 by 1 gives a mean of about $59,144,250. That ratio is not a typical partnership award and not a typical acre incentive. Unique recipients are unpublished.

Boise did not earn 10.937 by sitting on an ID tag. Neighboring Mountain West states keep their own joins. The overlay Partnerships For Climate-Smart Commodities in Idaho holds the stored rows. Do not add EQIP, CSP, or CRP listings into $59,144,250.

CFDA 10.937 without a farm or acre roster

PARTNERSHIPS FOR CLIMATE-SMART COMMODITIES is the catalog wording USAspending stores on the assistance line. It is not a ranking of Idaho against other states. The national CFDA 10.937 hub drops the Idaho filter. This packet quotes no nationwide Partnerships for Climate-Smart Commodities total.

Readers who want USDA climate-smart commodity announcements and NRCS partnership reports should open those publications. Mixing them with 1 USAspending rows would invent a figure this packet does not support. Partnership-acre folklore is not a field in the facts.

Idaho federal spending besides climate-smart commodities

Open Idaho federal spending for every program coded to the state. Open Idaho programs for the directory that includes 10.937 as one row. $59,144,250 is the tagged pair only. EQIP, CSP, or CRP listings remain separate joins.

A Partnerships for Climate-Smart Commodities award can carry a Idaho geography tag because a pass-through agency sits there. That tag does not prove work stayed inside Idaho after obligation. Twin Falls is not a named recipient of $59,144,250.

Partnership obligations are not acre incentives already paid

$59,144,250 is an obligation rollup. Outlays — Treasury payments — are a different USAspending series and are not in this packet. Drawdowns can lag the commitment. Cite USAspending.gov, not a state-budget story.

Twin Falls-versus-Idaho Falls folklore is not a partnership split. Unique farms are unpublished. Boise folklore is not a split of the 1 rows. No fiscal year is attached to $59,144,250.

How to cite Climate-Smart Commodities in Idaho

A complete citation names Partnerships For Climate-Smart Commodities, CFDA 10.937, Idaho, $59,144,250, and 1 awards, and labels the dollars as obligations. All spending ties indexes other pairs on the same metric.

If a later ingest restates the cell, the overlay Partnerships For Climate-Smart Commodities in Idaho is the live source. This JSON is a packet snapshot. Parent hubs (CFDA 10.937, Idaho federal spending, Idaho programs) are not extra dollars to add.

Limits of the 10.937 × ID overlay

FEC donations do not fund this USAspending cell. Matching 10.937 to ID is not causation. 1 is a record count, not a farm, partnership, or acre census. Do not rank Idaho as a winner or loser on Partnerships for Climate-Smart Commodities.

Twin Falls-versus-Idaho Falls folklore is not a partnership split. Unique farms are unpublished. Keep Partnerships For Climate-Smart Commodities, Idaho, $59,144,250, and 1 awards together in every reuse. Place of performance as ID locates the tagged awards; it does not prove every dollar stayed inside Idaho after obligation. Boise folklore is not a split of the 1 rows, and Twin Falls is not a named recipient of $59,144,250.

USAspending obligations can be positive new awards or net of downward modifications; $59,144,250 is the net total supplied in the facts. Treat 1 as a record count in an aggregate, not as 1 finished program years. Award modifications can sit beside base records in the same row count. The mean of about $59,144,250 per record will mislead anyone who treats it as a typical partnership award and not a typical acre incentive.

Questions

How much Partnerships for Climate-Smart Commodities funding is obligated in Idaho?

USAspending.gov records $59,144,250 in CFDA 10.937 obligations across 1 awards coded to Idaho. That is a program × state join, not an outlay and not Idaho's full federal total. Keep both the program name and Idaho in any citation.

Does one award mean one Idaho farm?

Award count is a row count. $59,144,250 ÷ 1 is about $59,144,250 per record as a mean, not a typical partnership award and not a typical acre incentive. Large partnership awards can dominate dollars. This packet does not list recipients. See Partnerships For Climate-Smart Commodities in Idaho for the stored table.

Is this Idaho's entire federal conservation book?

No. The $59,144,250 and 1 awards are USAspending.gov obligation records for CFDA 10.937 with a Idaho geography tag. EQIP, CSP, and CRP listings use different CFDAs. Those dollars sit outside this join. Mixing those files with this join would invent a figure the packet does not support.

Where is the live Idaho × 10.937 table?

Partnerships For Climate-Smart Commodities in Idaho is the overlay. See Idaho federal spending, Idaho programs, CFDA 10.937, and All spending ties. Later bulk files override this snapshot. Keep the obligation label on $59,144,250. Do not invent a fiscal year.