Port Infrastructure Development Program in Alaska
USAspending.gov records $140,755,125 in Port Infrastructure Development Program obligations (CFDA 20.823) with place of performance in Alaska, across 8 awards. eight instruments against $140.8 million imply about $17.59 million per award. This page joins DOT catalog 20.823 to the AK geography tag. It is not Alaska airport improvement, not a nationwide 20.823 rollup, and not Alaska's entire federal spending. Obligations are not outlays.
Key figures
- CFDA 20.823 shows $140,755,125 in Alaska obligations on 8 awards.
- The mean is about $17.59 million per award.
- Eight awards are not eight named ports.
- Alaska is a place-of-performance tag, not a port, terminal, or named-sponsor census.
- Figures are obligations, not outlays.
Eight Alaska instruments on CFDA 20.823
CFDA 20.823 is titled PORT INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM. Crossed with Alaska place of performance, obligations sum to $140,755,125 on 8 awards. The national 20.823 hub includes other states. Alaska’s spending hub includes other programs. Only this intersection is reported here. $140,755,125 is an obligation aggregate from USAspending.gov, not an outlay and not a count of Alaska ports or terminals.
eight awards is a thin MARAD port-infrastructure file with eight instruments. The join does not name recipients. Packet facts are $140,755,125, 8 awards, AK, and 20.823. Correlation is not causation. FEC donations do not fund this USAspending cell. Keep Port Infrastructure Development and Alaska together when reading $140,755,125.
Port infrastructure, not airport improvement
Airport Improvement Program (CFDA 20.106) is a different DOT catalog. Mixing 20.823 and 20.106 in Alaska would invent a combined port-and-airport book. Mixing those series into $140,755,125 would invent a broader total than this cell contains. Facts available: Alaska, CFDA 20.823, $140,755,125, 8 awards. Port names, project lists, and sponsor names are unpublished.
The catalog title names Port Infrastructure Development Program, not a ranking of Alaska ports. Dividing $140,755,125 by 8 yields about $17.59 million per award. Unique recipients are unpublished. 8 is not a port, terminal, or named-sponsor census.
Alaska geography on the port-development tag
AK is the place-of-performance code. Awards billed to Anchorage, Ketchikan, or Dutch Harbor can share the tag. Awards coded to Washington and Hawaii, stored as other geography keys stay outside $140,755,125 even when activity later crosses those lines. The code does not convert $140.8 million into a harbor atlas.
Alaska federal spending is the all-program parent. 20.823 is one row on Alaska programs. $140.8 million is not the state’s complete federal footprint. Open Port Infrastructure Development Program in Alaska for the filtered table, CFDA 20.823 for the catalog without a Alaska filter, and All spending ties for other pairs. Do not add those parents into $140,755,125.
Eight awards and a mid-seven-figure mean
$140,755,125 ÷ 8 is about $17.59 million per award. That average is a mid-seven-figure mean on eight rows, not a median. Net obligations can include downward modifications; the total shown is the aggregate in the facts. Treat 8 as a record count, not as 8 unique ports or 8 named sponsors.
Without a transaction register, you cannot see how many of the 8 rows are continuations, renewals, or corrections. Later ingests can restate $140,755,125 without changing the join key of 20.823 and AK. USAspending obligations can be positive new awards or net of downward modifications; $140,755,125 is the net total supplied in the facts. The pair remains Port Infrastructure Development plus Alaska. Do not treat $140,755,125 as an outlay series.
What Alaska port-infrastructure funding does not prove
A large 20.823 total tagged to Alaska does not measure whether Alaska cargo tonnage rose, and it does not equal docks already rebuilt. FEC donations do not fund this USAspending cell. Correlation is not causation. The headline remains $140,755,125 on 8 awards for Port Infrastructure Development in Alaska.
Keep both sides of the join: Port Infrastructure Development Program and Alaska, obligations only. Do not annualize $140,755,125 without a year field—this packet publishes none. Do not treat 8 as a port, terminal, or named-sponsor census. Quote USAspending.gov and the overlay path rather than a fishing-port narrative. Cite Port Infrastructure Development together with Alaska whenever you reuse $140,755,125.
Citing CFDA 20.823 in Alaska
The overlay target is the Alaska × CFDA 20.823 table. Open Port Infrastructure Development Program in Alaska when you want the same $140,755,125 / 8-award cell in the site’s data chrome. CFDA 20.823 drops the Alaska filter. Alaska federal spending drops the CFDA filter. Alaska programs lists other catalogs beside 20.823. All spending ties indexes other pairs.
This page exists because two tables meet: a CFDA program and a place-of-performance state. It does not exist to argue that Alaska won or lost federal money, that donations paid for the awards, or that obligations equal cash. The pair is 20.823 plus AK. Obligations of $140,755,125 are not outlays. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov for this 20.823 × AK pair. 8 remains an award-record count, not a person, facility, or project census. MARAD port-infrastructure awards often post as a short list of large instruments. Eight Alaska awards against $140,755,125 imply about $17.6 million per award. Dutch Harbor folklore is not an Aleutians split of the AK tag. Washington-coded port awards stay outside. Recipients stay unpublished.
Questions
- How much Port Infrastructure Development Program funding is obligated in Alaska?
- USAspending records $140,755,125 in CFDA 20.823 obligations with Alaska place of performance on 8 awards. That is the pair total, not an outlay. Keep Port Infrastructure Development Program and Alaska together when citing $140,755,125. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov. The join is a catalog intersection, not a budget.
- Do 8 awards mean 8 Alaska ports?
- 8 is a USAspending award-record count, not a port, terminal, or named-sponsor census. The implied mean is about $17.59 million per award. Unique recipients are unpublished. 8 is a record count, not a person or facility census. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov.
- Is this Alaska's total federal DOT spending?
- No. This join is CFDA 20.823 only. Airport Improvement uses CFDA 20.106 and sits on a separate Alaska program page. Nationwide 20.823 is not limited to Alaska. Obligations of $140,755,125 are not outlays. The overlay is the live Port Infrastructure Development–Alaska table.
- Has this port money already been spent on docks?
- No. $140,755,125 is an obligation sum. Outlays are a different USAspending series. Drawdowns can lag the federal obligation. This packet has no outlay total. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov for this 20.823 × AK pair. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov.
USAspending.gov CFDA program aggregates by place of performance state. Obligations are not outlays.