Renewable Energy Research And Development in New Hampshire

16 renewable-energy research awards tagged to New Hampshire

USAspending.gov records $55,807,888.92 in Renewable Energy Research And Development (CFDA 81.087) obligations with New Hampshire place of performance, across 16 awards. The pair is a catalog line crossed with a geography tag. It is not a lab, plant, or demonstration census and not New Hampshire's entire federal book. A 81.087 award tagged to Vermont, Maine, or Massachusetts is not here.

16 awards against $55,807,888.92 yields a mean of about $3,487,993.06 per record. That mean is arithmetic on packet facts, not a typical EERE award and not a typical demonstration plant. DOE renewable-energy research awards and cooperative agreements can dominate dollars while the row count stays at 16. This packet does not name the recipients of the 16 rows.

Concord did not earn 81.087 by sitting on an NH tag. Neighboring New England states keep their own joins. FEC donations do not fund this USAspending cell. The overlay Renewable Energy Research And Development in New Hampshire is the live table.

CFDA 81.087 without a plant or demonstration roster

The official catalog title is RENEWABLE ENERGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT. SpendingVault does not grade New Hampshire's Renewable Energy Research and Development system. $55,807,888.92 is an obligation sum, not a policy verdict. CFDA 81.087 is the national hub without the New Hampshire filter. This packet has no national Renewable Energy Research and Development total, so none is quoted.

DOE EERE award announcements and national-lab partnership reports are other series. Mixing a census from those files with this join would invent a per-unit dollar figure the packet does not support. EERE-lab folklore is ordinary speech, not a packet field. Office of science or other doe applied-energy listings stay outside $55,807,888.92.

New Hampshire federal spending besides renewable-energy R&D

New Hampshire federal spending covers every CFDA coded to the state. New Hampshire programs is the catalog directory. $55,807,888.92 is one cell. Quoting it as New Hampshire's entire federal book would drop Office of Science or other DOE applied-energy listings and every other line that also hits the state.

Place-of-performance New Hampshire on a Renewable Energy Research and Development vehicle is often an agency or payment-center address. It is not a map of where people live. This packet has no county split of the $55,807,888.92. Durham did not receive $55,807,888.92 as a named metro.

EERE obligations are not demonstrations already built

An obligation is a recorded commitment. An outlay is a payment. $55,807,888.92 is the commitment figure. This page does not convert the 16 awards into cash flows or lab, plant, or demonstration census counts. Keep the citation on USAspending.gov CFDA aggregates by place of performance state.

Concord budget documents answer other questions. They are not the source of this cell. Durham-versus-Hanover folklore is not a campus split. Unique labs are unpublished. Do not annualize $55,807,888.92; this packet publishes no fiscal year.

How to cite Renewable Energy R&D in New Hampshire

Cite: Renewable Energy Research And Development (CFDA 81.087) obligated $55,807,888.92 on 16 awards coded to New Hampshire, per USAspending.gov. Keep both keys. Keep the word obligations. All spending ties stores this pair with other program-by-state pages.

Later bulk files can move the dollars and the 16-award count. Prefer the overlay Renewable Energy Research And Development in New Hampshire when the live table and this snapshot diverge. CFDA 81.087, New Hampshire federal spending, New Hampshire programs, and All spending ties are parent hubs, not competing sums.

Limits of the 81.087 × NH overlay

This page will not treat 16 awards as 16 people or 16 local programs. It will not rank New Hampshire against Vermont, Maine, or Massachusetts on Renewable Energy Research and Development. Peer totals are not in these facts. Correlation is not causation. FEC donations do not fund this cell.

Durham-versus-Hanover folklore is not a campus split. Unique labs are unpublished. Keep Renewable Energy Research And Development, New Hampshire, $55,807,888.92, and 16 awards together in every reuse. Place of performance as NH locates the tagged awards; it does not prove every dollar stayed inside New Hampshire after obligation. Concord folklore is not a split of the 16 rows, and Durham is not a named recipient of $55,807,888.92.

Questions

How much Renewable Energy Research and Development is obligated in New Hampshire?

USAspending.gov records $55,807,888.92 in CFDA 81.087 obligations across 16 awards coded to New Hampshire. That is a program × state join, not an outlay and not New Hampshire's full federal total. Keep both the program name and New Hampshire in any citation.

Do 16 awards mean 16 New Hampshire energy labs?

Award count is a row count. $55,807,888.92 ÷ 16 is about $3,487,993.06 per record as a mean, not a typical EERE award and not a typical demonstration plant. DOE renewable-energy research awards and cooperative agreements can dominate dollars. This packet does not list recipients. See Renewable Energy Research And Development in New Hampshire for the stored table.

Is this New Hampshire's entire federal energy book?

No. The $55,807,888.92 and 16 awards are USAspending.gov obligation records for CFDA 81.087 with a New Hampshire geography tag. Office of Science (81.049) and other DOE applied-energy listings use different CFDAs. Those dollars sit outside this join. Mixing those files with this join would invent a figure the packet does not support.

Where is the live New Hampshire × 81.087 table?

Renewable Energy Research And Development in New Hampshire is the overlay. See New Hampshire federal spending, New Hampshire programs, CFDA 81.087, and All spending ties. Later bulk files override this snapshot. Keep the obligation label on $55,807,888.92. Do not invent a fiscal year.