Renewable Energy Research and Development in Oregon

Thirty-two Oregon renewable-energy R&D awards

Read Renewable Energy Research And Development in Oregon as the filtered table; this page is the prose overlay for the same cell. Renewable Energy Research And Development (CFDA 81.087) with Oregon place of performance sums to $305,003,976.59 on 32 awards. USAspending.gov is the source. The join is not a project, lab, or award-year census.

Implied mean obligation is about $9,531,374.27 ($305,003,976.59 ÷ 32). That ratio is not a typical demonstration project and not a typical lab year. DOE renewable-energy research awards and modifications explain large dollars beside a limited row count. Recipients are unpublished.

Salem did not earn the sum by sitting on an OR tag. Matching 81.087 to Oregon is not a ranking. Awards tagged to Washington, California, or Idaho are other cells. Office of Science, nuclear energy, or weatherization CFDAs stay outside $305,003,976.59 unless they also carry 81.087. FEC donations do not fund this USAspending cell. The overlay Renewable Energy Research And Development in Oregon is the live table.

CFDA 81.087 without a project directory

Official catalog title: RENEWABLE ENERGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT. That string is catalog language. It does not grade Oregon's energy mix. The nationwide 81.087 page includes other geographies, so it is not this cell.

DOE EERE award lists and university energy-center reports answer questions this packet cannot. Mixing those sources with the obligation sum would invent a combined total. Portland-versus-Corvallis lab folklore is not stored here. Nuclear, fossil, or grid CFDAs stay outside this cell unless they also carry 81.087.

Oregon's energy stack besides renewable R&D

Oregon federal spending is the all-program parent. Oregon programs lists other catalogs beside 81.087. Quoting $305,003,976.59 as the state's complete federal footprint would drop every other line, including Office of Science, nuclear energy, or weatherization CFDAs.

Place of performance as Oregon locates tagged awards; it does not deposit the dollars in Salem's treasury. Portland is not a named recipient of $305,003,976.59. Corvallis folklore is not a metro split of the 32 awards.

Renewable R&D obligations are not megawatts already online

$305,003,976.59 remains an obligation aggregate. Outlays are unpublished. Drawdowns can lag. Cite the commitment field, not a cash story. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov for this 81.087 × OR pair.

Portland-versus-Corvallis folklore is not a split of the 32 awards. Unique recipients are unpublished. Do not invent a fiscal year. Keep the obligation label on $305,003,976.59. Do not treat a state appropriations chart as this cell unless it uses CFDA 81.087, Oregon geography, and the obligation metric.

How to cite the 81.087–Oregon pair

Cite: Renewable Energy Research And Development (CFDA 81.087) obligated $305,003,976.59 on 32 awards coded to Oregon, per USAspending.gov. Keep both keys. Keep the word obligations. Internal links: Renewable Energy Research And Development in Oregon, CFDA 81.087, Oregon federal spending, Oregon programs, and All spending ties.

Later bulk files can move the dollars and the 32-award count. Prefer the overlay Renewable Energy Research And Development in Oregon when the live table and this snapshot diverge. CFDA 81.087, Oregon federal spending, Oregon programs, and All spending ties are parent hubs, not competing sums.

What 32 Oregon renewable-energy rows cannot stretch into

A ties page will not rank Oregon against Washington, California, or Idaho. Peer Renewable Energy R&D totals are not in these facts. 32 awards will not be recast as a project, lab, or award-year census. Correlation is not causation.

Keep Renewable Energy Research And Development, Oregon, $305,003,976.59, and 32 awards together in every reuse. Place of performance as OR locates the tagged awards; it does not prove every dollar stayed inside Oregon after obligation. Salem folklore is not a split of the 32 awards, and Portland is not a named recipient of $305,003,976.59.

USAspending obligations can be positive new awards or net of downward modifications; $305,003,976.59 is the net total supplied in the facts. Treat 32 as a record count in an aggregate, not as 32 finished program years. Award modifications can sit beside base records in the same row count. The mean of about $9,531,374.27 per record will mislead anyone who treats it as a typical demonstration project and not a typical lab year.

Questions

How much Renewable Energy R&D is obligated in Oregon?

USAspending.gov records $305,003,976.59 in CFDA 81.087 obligations across 32 awards coded to Oregon. That is a program × state join, not an outlay and not Oregon's full federal total. Keep both the program name and Oregon in any citation.

Do 32 awards mean 32 Oregon renewable projects?

Award count is a row count. $305,003,976.59 ÷ 32 is about $9,531,374.27 per record as a mean, not a typical demonstration project and not a typical lab year. DOE renewable-energy research awards and modifications can dominate dollars. This packet does not list recipients. See Renewable Energy Research And Development in Oregon for the stored table.

Is this Oregon's entire Energy Department book?

No. The $305,003,976.59 and 32 awards are USAspending.gov obligation records for CFDA 81.087 with an Oregon geography tag. Office of Science, nuclear energy, or weatherization CFDAs are separate joins. Those dollars sit outside this cell. Mixing those files with this join would invent a figure the packet does not support.

Where is the live Oregon × 81.087 overlay?

Renewable Energy Research And Development in Oregon is the overlay. See Oregon federal spending, Oregon programs, CFDA 81.087, and All spending ties. Later bulk files override this snapshot. Keep the obligation label on $305,003,976.59. Do not invent a fiscal year.