Research And Technology Development in Texas 25th District (TX-25)

R&D tech dollars stamped to Texas 25th District (TX-25)

CFDA 12.910 and congressional district TX-25 meet here. $371,927,281 is the USAspending.gov obligation sum on awards that carry both tags. It is not Research And Technology Development’s nationwide total, not every federal dollar coded to Texas 25th District (TX-25), and not an outlay register. The packet does not split research from prototype tasks and does not name performers. 7 is an action count: modifications and repeat awards add rows. Unique recipients are unpublished. It is not a lab census, a prototype inventory, or a named-performer file.

Dividing $371,927,281 by 7 yields about $53,132,468.71 per award on average. That ratio is two packet facts. It is not a typical research task order or a posted per-project figure. 7 awards against a $371.9 million R&D-tech cell is a thin file. Concentration pulls the implied mean up. Performers remain unpublished. Do not treat TX-25’s 12.910 cell as a synonym for every R&D tech account nationwide. Open Texas 25th District for the district table without this program filter, CFDA 12.910 for CFDA 12.910 without the TX-25 filter, Texas federal spending for every program in the Texas extract, and All spending ties for the rest of the join list. Quote those hubs as parents, not as addends to $371,927,281.

What R&D tech contributes on this pair

USAspending labels CFDA 12.910 as Research And Technology Development. That catalog number produced $371,927,281 when crossed with Texas 25th District (TX-25) place of performance. The program-wide 12.910 hub does not require TX-25 geography. The district hub does not require R&D tech. Only this tie applies both filters, which is why it cites 7 awards. The packet does not split research from prototype tasks and does not name performers.

Correlation is not causation: Texas 25th District (TX-25) did not “cause” $371,927,281 by existing as a large or small place. Population, outcome scores, and named facilities are not packet facts. The join is 12.910 × TX-25 only. It is not a lab census, a prototype inventory, or a named-performer file. Do not invent contractors or award recipients to fill the gap. Campaign donations on FEC tables do not fund this USAspending cell; the datasets are separate.

TX-25 versus Texas statewide totals

Texas 25th District (TX-25) on this join is a USAspending geography field, not a claim that every dollar was disbursed to residents of that district. Awards can list TX-25 while later work occurs elsewhere. Awards tagged to other Texas districts belong on those ties even when the CFDA is also 12.910. Texas 25th District (TX-25) is a numbered congressional place-of-performance code inside Texas. Other Texas districts are separate joins even when they reuse CFDA 12.910. Texas 25th District (TX-25) is not Texas 1st (clean-energy demonstrations, CFDA 81.255) or Texas 22nd (Medicare HI).

Texas federal spending shows how CFDA 12.910 sits beside other programs in the same state extract. $371,927,281 is one district-program column, not the state table. This packet does not split Texas 25th District (TX-25) by county, city, or census tract. Awards that carry a different CFDA stay on those other ties even if the work sounds related to Research And Technology Development. The district-wide obligation total published here is $10,861,223,759.89; $371,927,281 is the R&D tech slice of that denominator.

Why this page is not an outlay register

USAspending.gov records an obligation when the federal government commits funds on an award. $371,927,281 is that kind of sum for Research And Technology Development inside TX-25 coding. Later deobligations, recoveries, or payment schedules can change what leaves the Treasury without this join rewriting itself into a cash register. Assistance and contract awards can share the same CFDA rollup; this packet does not split them. Net obligations can include downward adjustments. This page reports $371,927,281 as given.

Texas’s own budget is a separate ledger. Mixing it with the 7-row R&D tech cell leaves USAspending.gov. Treat 7 as award records in the aggregate, not unique vendors. 7 is not a count of labs, prototypes, or performers. Do not annualize without a year field in the packet. Do not per-capita or per-recipient the dollar total; those denominators are unpublished. The implied mean ($53,132,468.71) is a concentration statistic, not a typical research task order or a posted per-project figure.

Live hubs versus this R&D tech snapshot

Cite USAspending.gov: Research And Technology Development (CFDA 12.910) obligated $371,927,281 on 7 awards coded to Texas 25th District (TX-25). Name Research And Technology Development and Texas 25th District (TX-25) together. Keep the obligation word. If Texas 25th District or CFDA 12.910 has refreshed, prefer the live hub over this snapshot for current rows. The pair is not a lab census, a prototype inventory, or a named-performer file. 3.4% of $10,861,223,759.89 is the district share on this packet, not a performance score. SMART STEM on Virginia 11th uses CFDA 12.631, not 12.910. Clean-energy demonstrations use CFDA 81.255. Do not merge those catalogs.

Keep Research And Technology Development, Texas 25th District (TX-25), $371,927,281, and 7 awards together. All spending ties indexes other pairs. CFDA 12.910 is the 12.910 parent without a TX-25 filter. Texas federal spending is the Texas parent. Do not add those parents to this cell. Sharing a district with R&D tech does not mean campaign donations funded these awards, and it does not convert obligations into outlays. This page reports one USAspending join.

What this 12.910 packet refuses to infer

7 awards against a $371.9 million R&D-tech cell is a thin file. Concentration pulls the implied mean up. Performers remain unpublished. A large row count makes a project split tempting; the packet still does not supply one. A small row count makes a named-facility story tempting; the packet still does not name facilities or contractors. The implied mean (about $53,132,468.71) and the district share (3.4% of $10,861,223,759.89) are ratios of packet facts. Prefer Texas 25th District and CFDA 12.910 if the live tables moved.

Do not rank Texas 25th District (TX-25) as more R&D tech-dependent than neighboring districts on the strength of this cell alone. Neighboring geographies have their own 12.910 ties with different dollar totals, or no published 12.910 cell in this harvest. This snapshot holds $371,927,281 and 7 only. All spending ties is the index, not an addend. Obligations are not outlays. Correlation is not causation.

Questions

How much R&D tech spending is coded to Texas 25th District (TX-25)?

USAspending.gov lists $371,927,281 in Research And Technology Development obligations across 7 awards with place of performance in Texas 25th District (TX-25). CFDA 12.910 × TX-25 is an obligation join, not an outlay and not Texas’s complete federal ledger. The cell is 3.4% of the district’s published total ($10,861,223,759.89). Unique recipients are unpublished. Average obligation is about $53,132,468.71, a ratio of those two facts only.

Does $371,927,281 include every R&D tech project in TX-25?

The packet publishes one CFDA rollup. The packet does not split research from prototype tasks and does not name performers. $371,927,281 is the combined obligation sum for CFDA 12.910 inside TX-25 coding. This page will not invent a project pie or name contractors. Open CFDA 12.910 and Texas 25th District to inspect parent tables. 7 remains an action count, not a count of labs, prototypes, or performers.

Is $371,927,281 cash already paid in Texas 25th District (TX-25)?

No. Obligations are commitments recorded on USAspending.gov awards. Outlays — money that actually left the Treasury — are a different concept and are not this packet’s headline. Treating $371,927,281 as checks already cleared in Texas 25th District (TX-25) confuses those terms. Later ingests can revise 7 awards. Prefer the live district and program hubs if the tables moved.

What share of TX-25 obligations is CFDA 12.910?

CFDA 12.910 accounts for 3.4% of $10,861,223,759.89 in district-wide obligations on this packet. That share is $371,927,281 ÷ $10,861,223,759.89. It is not a ranking of Texas districts and not an outlay share. Other programs occupy the remaining district total on other ties.