Rural Rental Assistance Payments in Alabama
$368,437,669.27 is the obligation sum when Rural Rental Assistance Payments (CFDA 10.427) is filtered to Alabama place of performance. USAspending.gov supplies the table. 412 awards back that total. The pair is not Section 8 Housing Assistance Payments, not Public Housing Operating Fund, and not a named property roster. About $894,266.19 per award is arithmetic only. Obligations are not outlays.
Key figures
- CFDA 10.427 shows $368,437,669.27 in Alabama obligations on 412 awards.
- The mean is about $894,266.19 per award.
- The catalog is Rural Rental Assistance Payments, not Section 8 Housing Assistance Payments, not Public Housing Operating Fund, and not a named property roster.
- Alabama is a place-of-performance tag, not a unit census.
- Figures are obligations, not outlays.
Where Rural Rental Assistance Payments and Alabama share a table
Rural Rental Assistance Payments (CFDA 10.427) filtered to Alabama yields $368,437,669.27. That is the headline number. The table is a join, not a narrative about who deserved the money. The cell is not Section 8 Housing Assistance Payments, not Public Housing Operating Fund, and not a named property roster.
Place of performance can differ from recipient headquarters. This packet publishes neither split. Neighbor states (Tennessee, Georgia, Florida, and Mississippi) stay outside $368,437,669.27.
Cite USAspending.gov, obligations only, CFDA 10.427, and Alabama. Links: /states/al/programs/10.427/, /programs/10.427/, /states/al/, /states/al/programs/, /ties/.
Rural rental assistance as a USDA listing
Rural Rental Assistance Payments is a Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance line, not a story about a single office. CFDA 10.427 groups assistance that USAspending coded to that number. RURAL RENTAL ASSISTANCE PAYMENTS is the official title. Packet facts do not list awarding sub-agencies.
The join is not Section 8 Housing Assistance Payments, not Public Housing Operating Fund, and not a named property roster. Alabama HUD housing catalogs use other CFDA numbers. Do not merge those other catalogs into $368,437,669.27. Do not invent properties, owners, or assisted households from the award count.
Readers comparing Alabama to other states should open those other state-program pages rather than inferring a rank from $368,437,669.27. This file does not publish a national share or a year-over-year change because those figures are not in the packet.
Alabama geography on CFDA 10.427
The state side of the join is Alabama. Packet facts do not name cities. Mentioning Birmingham, Montgomery, or Huntsville only warns that those places are unpublished splits, not extra totals. Do not add a city share into $368,437,669.27.
Alabama HUD housing catalogs use other CFDA numbers. Cross-border work with Tennessee, Georgia, Florida, and Mississippi does not expand this cell. Quote CFDA 10.427 and Alabama together.
Assistance awards coded to CFDA 10.427 can include grants, cooperative agreements, or other USAspending award types. The packet does not break $368,437,669.27 out by award type, so this copy does not either.
Four hundred twelve awards, not 412 named properties
The award count is 412. High counts (when they occur) still do not name properties, owners, or assisted households. Low counts still can sum to $368,437,669.27. Either way, the packet gives only the count and the dollars.
Agency, year, and recipient splits are omitted. No fiscal year is in the facts. Cite 412 awards and $368,437,669.27 together, not as a ranking of Alabama.
If a dashboard elsewhere shows a different total for Rural Rental Assistance Payments in Alabama, check whether that dashboard uses outlays, a different year, or a recipient-location field instead of place of performance. This cell uses the packet’s obligation sum of $368,437,669.27 on 412 awards.
What rural rental assistance payments in Alabama will not prove
Caveats travel with the number: obligations, not outlays; Alabama place of performance, not a city split; CFDA 10.427, not Section 8 Housing Assistance Payments, not Public Housing Operating Fund, and not a named property roster. Packet facts include no contractors.
A future USAspending bulk file can change $368,437,669.27 and 412 together. Until then, quote both with Rural Rental Assistance Payments and Alabama. Campaign-finance tables are a different dataset.
Internal links are exhaustive for this page: every href in the packet appears in the body and in the internalLinks array. Overlay, program hub, state hub, program index, and ties index remain separate from the $368,437,669.27 cell.
Parent hubs for 10.427 in Alabama
Use /states/al/programs/10.427/ (Rural Rental Assistance Payments in Alabama) for the overlay, /programs/10.427/ (CFDA 10.427) for the listing, /states/al/ (Alabama federal spending) for the state hub, /states/al/programs/ (Alabama programs) for the program index, and /ties/ (All spending ties) for other pairs. Cite CFDA 10.427, Alabama, $368,437,669.27, USAspending.gov, obligations only.
Keep Rural Rental Assistance Payments and Alabama together when citing $368,437,669.27. CFDA 10.427 lists 412 awards on this AL join. Obligations of $368,437,669.27 are not outlays. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov for this CFDA 10.427 × AL pair. Do not add parent hubs into this state-program cell. Mean dollars per action remain about $894,266.19 if you divide those two facts. AL is place of performance, not a split of Birmingham, Montgomery, or Huntsville. The join is not Section 8 Housing Assistance Payments, not Public Housing Operating Fund, and not a named property roster. Source note: USAspending.gov CFDA program aggregates by place of performance state. Obligations are not outlays.
Questions
- How much Rural Rental Assistance Payments funding is obligated in Alabama?
- USAspending.gov records $368,437,669.27 in CFDA 10.427 obligations with Alabama place of performance on 412 awards. That is the pair total, not an outlay and not Section 8 Housing Assistance Payments, not Public Housing Operating Fund, and not a named property roster. Keep Rural Rental Assistance Payments and Alabama together when citing $368,437,669.27. Cite both 10.427 and Alabama together.
- Do 412 awards mean 412 properties in Alabama?
- No. 412 is a USAspending award-record count, not 412 properties, owners, or assisted households. The implied mean is about $894,266.19 per award. Unique recipients are unpublished. Obligations of $368,437,669.27 are not outlays. USAspending.gov remains the source for this 10.427 × AL pair.
- Is this Alabama’s full federal spend for related programs?
- No. $368,437,669.27 is only the CFDA 10.427 × Alabama cell. The join is not Section 8 Housing Assistance Payments, not Public Housing Operating Fund, and not a named property roster. Other catalogs appear on separate Alabama program pages. Nationwide 10.427 is not limited to Alabama. Mixing CFDA numbers would invent a larger total.
- Where is the live 10.427 × Alabama table?
- Rural Rental Assistance Payments in Alabama is the overlay at /states/al/programs/10.427/. CFDA 10.427 is /programs/10.427/. Alabama federal spending is /states/al/. Alabama programs is /states/al/programs/. All spending ties is /ties/. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov for this 10.427 × AL pair. Keep Rural Rental Assistance Payments and Alabama in the same citation.
USAspending.gov CFDA program aggregates by place of performance state. Obligations are not outlays.