Skip to main content
← All data ties

Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers in Texas 30th District (TX-30)

$354,164,400 is the USAspending.gov obligation sum for CFDA 14.871 (Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers) inside Texas 30th District (TX-30), on 82 award records. Eighty-two Housing Choice Voucher awards equal about 6.0% of TX-30’s $5.86 billion district book — a moderate HCV file whose share is larger than New Jersey 12th’s because the Texas denominator is smaller. That pair is Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers and Texas 30th District (TX-30) — not Texas’s entire federal inflow, not Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers nationwide, and not cash already paid. The cell is 6.0% of this district’s published obligation total ($5,861,507,347.90). Implied average obligation is about $4,319,078.05 ($354,164,400 ÷ 82). Correlation is not causation.

Key figures

  • HCV in Texas 30th District (TX-30): $354,164,400 across 82 USAspending awards.
  • Implied mean about $4,319,078.05 per record; district share 6.0% of $5,861,507,347.90.
  • CFDA 14.871 × TX-30 is an obligation join, not an outlay and not a named-recipient list.
  • Cite USAspending.gov; quote Texas 30th District and CFDA 14.871 if live tables moved.
  • Texas federal spending and All spending ties are parents and an index, not amounts to add into $354,164,400.

Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers crossed with Texas 30th District (TX-30)

CFDA 14.871 and congressional district TX-30 meet here. $354,164,400 is the USAspending.gov obligation sum on awards that carry both tags. It is not Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers’s nationwide total, not every federal dollar coded to Texas 30th District (TX-30), and not an outlay register. The packet does not split public housing agencies inside the geography and does not publish a household denominator. 82 is an action count: modifications and repeat awards add rows. Unique recipients are unpublished. It is not a voucher-holder census, a landlord roster, or a named-PHA file.

Dividing $354,164,400 by 82 yields about $4,319,078.05 per award on average. That ratio is two packet facts. It is not a typical voucher payment or a posted per-household figure. 82 awards is a moderate voucher file. Public housing agencies and landlords remain unpublished. New Jersey 12th is a different 14.871 stamp. Do not treat TX-30’s 14.871 cell as a synonym for every HCV account nationwide. Open Texas 30th District for the district table without this program filter, CFDA 14.871 for CFDA 14.871 without the TX-30 filter, Texas federal spending for every program in the Texas extract, and All spending ties for the rest of the join list. Quote those hubs as parents, not as addends to $354,164,400.

How the award file labels Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers

USAspending labels CFDA 14.871 as Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers. That catalog number produced $354,164,400 when crossed with Texas 30th District (TX-30) place of performance. The program-wide 14.871 hub does not require TX-30 geography. The district hub does not require HCV. Only this tie applies both filters, which is why it cites 82 awards. The packet does not split public housing agencies inside the geography and does not publish a household denominator.

Correlation is not causation: Texas 30th District (TX-30) did not “cause” $354,164,400 by existing as a large or small place. Population, outcome scores, and named facilities are not packet facts. The join is 14.871 × TX-30 only. It is not a voucher-holder census, a landlord roster, or a named-PHA file. Do not invent contractors or award recipients to fill the gap. Campaign donations on FEC tables do not fund this USAspending cell; the datasets are separate.

Place of performance is TX-30, not a site map

Texas 30th District (TX-30) on this join is a USAspending geography field, not a claim that every dollar was disbursed to residents of that district. Awards can list TX-30 while later work occurs elsewhere. Awards tagged to other Texas districts belong on those ties even when the CFDA is also 14.871. Texas 30th District (TX-30) is a numbered congressional place-of-performance code inside Texas. Other Texas districts are separate joins even when they reuse CFDA 14.871. Texas 30th District (TX-30) is not Texas 22nd (Medicare HI), Texas 1st (clean-energy demonstrations), or Texas 25th (R&D tech).

Texas federal spending shows how CFDA 14.871 sits beside other programs in the same state extract. $354,164,400 is one district-program column, not the state table. This packet does not split Texas 30th District (TX-30) by county, city, or census tract. Awards that carry a different CFDA stay on those other ties even if the work sounds related to Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers. The district-wide obligation total published here is $5,861,507,347.90; $354,164,400 is the HCV slice of that denominator.

Commitment totals versus cash already paid

USAspending.gov records an obligation when the federal government commits funds on an award. $354,164,400 is that kind of sum for Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers inside TX-30 coding. Later deobligations, recoveries, or payment schedules can change what leaves the Treasury without this join rewriting itself into a cash register. Assistance and contract awards can share the same CFDA rollup; this packet does not split them. Net obligations can include downward adjustments. This page reports $354,164,400 as given.

Keeping both sides of the 14.871 × TX-30 pair

Cite USAspending.gov: Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers (CFDA 14.871) obligated $354,164,400 on 82 awards coded to Texas 30th District (TX-30). Name Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers and Texas 30th District (TX-30) together. Keep the obligation word. If Texas 30th District or CFDA 14.871 has refreshed, prefer the live hub over this snapshot for current rows. The pair is not a voucher-holder census, a landlord roster, or a named-PHA file. 6.0% of $5,861,507,347.90 is the district share on this packet, not a performance score. New Jersey 12th also hosts CFDA 14.871. Head Start uses CFDA 93.600. Do not merge those assistance catalogs into this TX-30 HCV join.

Share, mean, and the inferences they do not support

82 awards is a moderate voucher file. Public housing agencies and landlords remain unpublished. New Jersey 12th is a different 14.871 stamp. A large row count makes a project split tempting; the packet still does not supply one. A small row count makes a named-facility story tempting; the packet still does not name facilities or contractors. The implied mean (about $4,319,078.05) and the district share (6.0% of $5,861,507,347.90) are ratios of packet facts. Prefer Texas 30th District and CFDA 14.871 if the live tables moved.

Do not rank Texas 30th District (TX-30) as more HCV-dependent than neighboring districts on the strength of this cell alone. Neighboring geographies have their own 14.871 ties with different dollar totals, or no published 14.871 cell in this harvest. This snapshot holds $354,164,400 and 82 only. All spending ties is the index, not an addend. Obligations are not outlays. Correlation is not causation.

Questions

How much HCV spending is coded to Texas 30th District (TX-30)?
USAspending.gov lists $354,164,400 in Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers obligations across 82 awards with place of performance in Texas 30th District (TX-30). CFDA 14.871 × TX-30 is an obligation join, not an outlay and not Texas’s complete federal ledger. The cell is 6.0% of the district’s published total ($5,861,507,347.90). Unique recipients are unpublished. Average obligation is about $4,319,078.05, a ratio of those two facts only.
Does $354,164,400 include every HCV project in TX-30?
The packet publishes one CFDA rollup. The packet does not split public housing agencies inside the geography and does not publish a household denominator. $354,164,400 is the combined obligation sum for CFDA 14.871 inside TX-30 coding. This page will not invent a project pie or name contractors. Open CFDA 14.871 and Texas 30th District to inspect parent tables. 82 remains an action count, not a count of vouchers, landlords, or PHAs.
Is $354,164,400 cash already paid in Texas 30th District (TX-30)?
No. Obligations are commitments recorded on USAspending.gov awards. Outlays — money that actually left the Treasury — are a different concept and are not this packet’s headline. Treating $354,164,400 as checks already cleared in Texas 30th District (TX-30) confuses those terms. Later ingests can revise 82 awards. Prefer the live district and program hubs if the tables moved.
How does this HCV cell relate to Texas statewide spending?
Texas federal spending is the Texas statewide extract across programs. $354,164,400 is the Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers amount inside Texas 30th District (TX-30) only, not the statewide HCV total. Adding Texas federal spending to $354,164,400 double-counts. CFDA 14.871 nationwide lives on CFDA 14.871. This join is 14.871 × TX-30.

USAspending.gov congressional district place-of-performance joined to CFDA program. Obligations are not outlays.