Social Security Retirement Insurance in South Dakota At-Large District (SD-00)

A place-of-performance join: SSA Retirement × SD-00

CFDA 96.002 and congressional district SD-00 meet here. $3,537,684,718.00 is the USAspending.gov obligation sum on awards that carry both tags. It is not Social Security Retirement Insurance's nationwide total, not every federal dollar coded to South Dakota At-Large District (SD-00), and not an outlay register. The packet does not split retired-worker from spouse or survivor benefits and does not publish a beneficiary denominator. 792 is an action count: modifications and repeat awards add rows. Unique recipients are unpublished. It is not a beneficiary census, a field-office roster, or a named-payee file.

Dividing $3,537,684,718.00 by 792 yields about $4,466,773.63 per award on average. That ratio is two packet facts. It is not a typical monthly check or a posted per-beneficiary figure. Seven hundred ninety-two awards against a three-point-five-billion-dollar SSA retirement cell is the densest row file in this harvest; implied mean is correspondingly lower. Do not invent contractors or award recipients. Do not treat SD-00's 96.002 cell as a synonym for every SSA Retirement account nationwide. Quote South Dakota At-Large District, CFDA 96.002, South Dakota federal spending, and All spending ties as parents, not as addends to $3,537,684,718.00.

CFDA 96.002 as a catalog tag, not as a named-payee list

USAspending labels CFDA 96.002 as Social Security Retirement Insurance. That catalog number produced $3,537,684,718.00 when crossed with South Dakota At-Large District (SD-00) place of performance. The program-wide 96.002 hub does not require SD-00 geography. The district hub does not require SSA Retirement. Only this tie applies both filters, which is why it cites 792 awards. The packet does not split retired-worker from spouse or survivor benefits and does not publish a beneficiary denominator.

Correlation is not causation: South Dakota At-Large District (SD-00) did not cause $3,537,684,718.00 by existing as a large or small place. Population, outcome scores, and named facilities are not packet facts. The join is 96.002 × SD-00 only. It is not a beneficiary census, a field-office roster, or a named-payee file. Do not invent contractors or award recipients to fill the gap. Campaign donations on FEC tables do not fund this USAspending cell; the datasets are separate. South Dakota At-Large District (SD-00) is the geography on this join only. North Dakota At-Large on this harvest hosts Medicare pairs (93.774 and 93.773), not SSA. Do not mix those ND-00 cells into SD-00.

South Dakota At-Large District as one House geography

South Dakota At-Large District (SD-00) on this join is a USAspending geography field, not a claim that every dollar was disbursed to residents of that district. Awards can list SD-00 while later work occurs elsewhere. Awards tagged to other South Dakota districts belong on those ties even when the CFDA is also 96.002. South Dakota At-Large District (SD-00) is a numbered congressional place-of-performance code inside South Dakota. Other South Dakota districts are separate joins even when they reuse CFDA 96.002.

South Dakota federal spending shows how CFDA 96.002 sits beside other programs in the same state extract. $3,537,684,718.00 is one district-program column, not the state table. This packet does not split South Dakota At-Large District (SD-00) by county, city, or census tract. Awards that carry a different CFDA stay on those other ties even if the work sounds related to Social Security Retirement Insurance. The district-wide obligation total published here is $20,304,783,123.44; $3,537,684,718.00 is the SSA Retirement slice of that denominator.

Commitments versus outlays on a 792-row cell

USAspending.gov records an obligation when the federal government commits funds on an award. $3,537,684,718.00 is that kind of sum for Social Security Retirement Insurance inside SD-00 coding. Later deobligations, recoveries, or payment schedules can change what leaves the Treasury without this join rewriting itself into a cash register. Assistance and contract awards can share the same CFDA rollup; this packet does not split them. Net obligations can include downward adjustments. This page reports $3,537,684,718.00 as given.

South Dakota's own budget is a separate ledger. Mixing it with the 792-row SSA Retirement cell leaves USAspending.gov. Treat 792 as award records in the aggregate, not unique vendors. 792 is not a count of beneficiaries, field offices, or check months. Do not annualize without a year field in the packet. Do not per-capita or per-recipient the dollar total; those denominators are unpublished. The implied mean ($4,466,773.63) is a concentration statistic, not a typical monthly check or a posted per-beneficiary figure.

Citing the pair without mixing North Dakota Medicare cells

Cite USAspending.gov: Social Security Retirement Insurance (CFDA 96.002) obligated $3,537,684,718.00 on 792 awards coded to South Dakota At-Large District (SD-00). Name Social Security Retirement Insurance and South Dakota At-Large District (SD-00) together. Keep the obligation word. If South Dakota At-Large District or CFDA 96.002 has refreshed, prefer the live hub over this snapshot for current rows. The pair is not a beneficiary census, a field-office roster, or a named-payee file. 17.4% of $20,304,783,123.44 is the district share on this packet, not a performance score. Keep Social Security Retirement Insurance, South Dakota At-Large District (SD-00), $3,537,684,718.00, and 792 awards together. All spending ties indexes other pairs. Do not add parent hubs into this cell.

792 awards against a 17.4% district share

Seven hundred ninety-two awards against a three-point-five-billion-dollar SSA retirement cell is the densest row file in this harvest; implied mean is correspondingly lower. A large row count makes a project split tempting; the packet still does not supply one. A small row count makes a named-facility story tempting; the packet still does not name facilities or contractors. The implied mean (about $4,466,773.63) and the district share (17.4% of $20,304,783,123.44) are ratios of packet facts. Prefer South Dakota At-Large District and CFDA 96.002 if the live tables moved.

Questions

How much SSA Retirement spending is coded to South Dakota At-Large District (SD-00)?

USAspending.gov lists $3,537,684,718.00 in Social Security Retirement Insurance obligations across 792 awards with place of performance in South Dakota At-Large District (SD-00). CFDA 96.002 × SD-00 is an obligation join, not an outlay and not South Dakota's complete federal ledger. The cell is 17.4% of the district's published total ($20,304,783,123.44). Unique recipients are unpublished. Average obligation is about $4,466,773.63, a ratio of those two facts only.

Does $3,537,684,718.00 include every SSA Retirement project in SD-00?

The packet publishes one CFDA rollup. The packet does not split retired-worker from spouse or survivor benefits and does not publish a beneficiary denominator. $3,537,684,718.00 is the combined obligation sum for CFDA 96.002 inside SD-00 coding. This page will not invent a project pie or name contractors. Open CFDA 96.002 and South Dakota At-Large District to inspect parent tables. 792 remains an action count, not a count of beneficiaries, field offices, or check months.

Is $3,537,684,718.00 cash already paid in South Dakota At-Large District (SD-00)?

No. Obligations are commitments recorded on USAspending.gov awards. Outlays — money that actually left the Treasury — are a different concept and are not this packet's headline. Treating $3,537,684,718.00 as checks already cleared in South Dakota At-Large District (SD-00) confuses those terms. Later ingests can revise 792 awards. Prefer the live district and program hubs if the tables moved.

Is South Dakota At-Large District (SD-00) ranked against other South Dakota districts here?

No. This page does not rank South Dakota At-Large District (SD-00) as a winner or loser. $3,537,684,718.00 and 792 describe one join. Neighboring districts have their own cells. District 90/98 placeholders are omitted. Cite Social Security Retirement Insurance and South Dakota At-Large District (SD-00) together without a league table. 17.4% of $20,304,783,123.44 is arithmetic, not a score.