How much SSI is obligated in Ohio?

USAspending.gov shows $6,333,737,783 across 6,029 awards for CFDA 96.006 tagged to Ohio. That is an obligation join, not a caseload.

Why does Ohio have more SSI awards than Pennsylvania in this slice?

Ohio shows 6,029 award actions versus Pennsylvania’s 4,753 on their respective 96.006 cells. That is file texture — modifications and vehicle mix — not a published recipient census.

Is this the same as SSDI in Ohio?

No. This join is only 96.006, Supplemental Security Income. SSDI uses a different CFDA number.

Where is the live Ohio SSI table?

Supplemental Security Income in Ohio. See also Ohio federal spending, Ohio programs, CFDA 96.006, and All spending ties.

← All data ties

Supplemental Security Income funding in Ohio

Supplemental Security Income (CFDA 96.006) obligations tagged to Ohio total $6,333,737,783 on USAspending.gov across 6,029 awards. Ohio’s SSI file is thicker in rows than Pennsylvania’s 4,753-row SSI cell and smaller in dollars. That inversion is bookkeeping mix, not a finding that Ohio has more recipients. The join is Title XVI SSI plus an OH place-of-performance tag. Six thousand twenty-nine SSI actions make Ohio’s 96.006 file thicker in rows than Pennsylvania’s SSI cell and smaller in dollars — texture, not a caseload ranking.

Key figures

Ohio SSI (CFDA 96.006): $6,333,737,783 on 6,029 USAspending awards.
The implied mean is about $1,050,500 per award; 6,029 is an action count, not a caseload.
A thicker file than Pennsylvania’s SSI cell is not a recipient ranking.
Cite obligations, not outlays; no fiscal year is attached.
The join is 96.006 × OH, not a poverty map.

A thicker SSI action file on Ohio

Keep USAspending rows labeled SUPPLEMENTAL SECURITY INCOME whose geography is Ohio (OH). Six thousand twenty-nine awards remain. They sum to $6,333,737,783. SSI is needs-tested. The extract counts CFDA 96.006 award actions, not a caseload of Ohioans.

The implied mean is about $1,050,500 per award — lower than Pennsylvania’s SSI implied mean on a thicker file. More rows and a lower average often mean more small actions or modifications in the mix. Unique recipients are still unpublished.

Ohio federal spending is every CFDA on OH. CFDA 96.006 is SSI nationwide. Supplemental Security Income in Ohio is the overlap. Ohio programs and All spending ties are the indexes.

Ohio SLFRF in this slice is three awards on 21.027. SSI is 6,029 awards on 96.006. Same OH tag, different statutes. Do not read the thicker SSI file as ‘more COVID relief.’

Aged, blind, and disabled SSI groups are not split. $6,333,737,783 is the obligation sum only.

SSI is not SLFRF and not SSDI

Ohio also has a Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds cell in this slice. Those are different Catalog numbers. Do not treat $6,333,737,783 as pandemic relief or as Title II disability insurance.

Place-of-performance can follow administration or beneficiary geography. An OH tag does not prove every SSI recipient lives in Ohio. Border commuting with Kentucky, Indiana, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, or Michigan is not a field here.

State supplements, if recorded at all, are not split out. This page will not invent a federal-versus-state SSI split.

Appalachian Ohio and the I-75 corridor share OH. Border commuting with neighboring states is not a field.

State supplements are not separated. Do not invent a federal-versus-state SSI split.

Obligations versus monthly payments

Quote $6,333,737,783 as USAspending obligations for CFDA 96.006 in Ohio. Do not quote it as benefits already deposited. Outlays and SSA tables are other sources.

No fiscal year is in the facts. Do not invent one. Cite USAspending.gov CFDA program aggregates by place of performance state.

SSA SSI tables are a different series. Mixing them with this join without a crosswalk invents a recipient count.

Statewide OH, not an Appalachia-versus-Cleveland map

This packet does not split 6,029 awards or $6,333,737,783 by county or metro. A Cuyahoga story and an Appalachian-county story would need a different table. The extract stays statewide.

Do not rank Ohio as poorer from this cell. Poverty rates are unpublished. Correlation with Ohio SLFRF is not causation.

Cuyahoga, Franklin, and Hamilton counties share the OH tag. Metro stories need SSA geography.

Citation line

Quote USAspending.gov: Supplemental Security Income (CFDA 96.006) obligated $6,333,737,783 on 6,029 awards coded to Ohio. Name SSI and Ohio together.

The overlay Supplemental Security Income in Ohio is the live pair.

How to cite Ohio SSI

Name Supplemental Security Income, CFDA 96.006, Ohio, $6,333,737,783, 6,029 awards, USAspending obligations.

Supplemental Security Income in Ohio is the overlay. Keep SLFRF on CFDA 21.027.

Ohio SSI’s 6,029 actions are thicker in rows than Pennsylvania’s SSI cell and smaller in dollars. That inversion is file mix. $6,333,737,783 stays on CFDA 96.006. Ohio SLFRF is three awards on 21.027 — a different statute. Unique recipients are unpublished. Quote USAspending obligations, not a caseload, and do not rank Ohio as poorer from this extract.

Follow Supplemental Security Income in Ohio for the live 96.006 table. $6,333,737,783 and 6,029 awards are the citation pair. SLFRF on 21.027 remains a different Ohio join. Unique recipients stay unpublished. Do not invent a poverty ranking or a fiscal year.

Questions

How much SSI is obligated in Ohio?: USAspending.gov shows $6,333,737,783 across 6,029 awards for CFDA 96.006 tagged to Ohio. That is an obligation join, not a caseload.
Why does Ohio have more SSI awards than Pennsylvania in this slice?: Ohio shows 6,029 award actions versus Pennsylvania’s 4,753 on their respective 96.006 cells. That is file texture — modifications and vehicle mix — not a published recipient census.
Is this the same as SSDI in Ohio?: No. This join is only 96.006, Supplemental Security Income. SSDI uses a different CFDA number.
Where is the live Ohio SSI table?: Supplemental Security Income in Ohio. See also Ohio federal spending, Ohio programs, CFDA 96.006, and All spending ties.

USAspending.gov CFDA program aggregates by place of performance state. Obligations are not outlays.