Skip to main content
← All data ties

Title I LEA grants in Alabama 2nd District (AL-02)

$606,071,919 is the USAspending.gov obligation sum for CFDA 84.010 (Title I Grants To Local Educational Agencies) inside Alabama 2nd District (AL-02), on 2 award records. Two Title I awards equal about three percent of AL-02’s district obligation total because the district denominator exceeds twenty-one billion dollars. That pair is Title I Grants To Local Educational Agencies and Alabama 2nd District (AL-02) — not Alabama’s entire federal inflow, not Title I Grants To Local Educational Agencies nationwide, and not cash already paid. The cell is 2.8% of this district’s published obligation total ($21,388,752,151.47). Implied average obligation is about $303,035,959.50 ($606,071,919 ÷ 2). Correlation is not causation.

Key figures

  • Title I in Alabama 2nd District (AL-02): $606,071,919 across 2 USAspending awards.
  • Implied mean about $303,035,959.50 per record; district share 2.8% of $21,388,752,151.47.
  • CFDA 84.010 × AL-02 is an obligation join, not an outlay and not a named-recipient list.
  • Cite USAspending.gov; quote Alabama 2nd District and CFDA 84.010 if live tables moved.
  • Alabama federal spending and All spending ties are parents and an index, not amounts to add into $606,071,919.

Title I Grants To Local Educational Agencies and Alabama 2nd District (AL-02) as a USAspending pair

CFDA 84.010 and congressional district AL-02 meet here. $606,071,919 is the USAspending.gov obligation sum on awards that carry both tags. It is not Title I Grants To Local Educational Agencies’s nationwide total, not every federal dollar coded to Alabama 2nd District (AL-02), and not an outlay register. The packet does not split school districts inside the geography and does not publish a pupil denominator. 2 is an action count: modifications and repeat awards add rows. Unique recipients are unpublished. It is not a school census, a pupil headcount, or a named-LEA roster.

Dividing $606,071,919 by 2 yields about $303,035,959.50 per award on average. That ratio is two packet facts. It is not a typical per-pupil allocation or a posted per-school figure. Two awards against a six-hundred-six-million-dollar Title I cell is extreme concentration. Recipients remain unpublished. Do not treat AL-02’s 84.010 cell as a synonym for every Title I account nationwide. Open Alabama 2nd District for the district table without this program filter, CFDA 84.010 for CFDA 84.010 without the AL-02 filter, Alabama federal spending for every program in the Alabama extract, and All spending ties for the rest of the join list. Quote those hubs as parents, not as addends to $606,071,919.

How USAspending labels Title I Grants To Local Educational Agencies

USAspending labels CFDA 84.010 as Title I Grants To Local Educational Agencies. That catalog number produced $606,071,919 when crossed with Alabama 2nd District (AL-02) place of performance. The program-wide 84.010 hub does not require AL-02 geography. The district hub does not require Title I. Only this tie applies both filters, which is why it cites 2 awards. The packet does not split school districts inside the geography and does not publish a pupil denominator.

Correlation is not causation: Alabama 2nd District (AL-02) did not “cause” $606,071,919 by existing as a large or small place. Population, outcome scores, and named facilities are not packet facts. The join is 84.010 × AL-02 only. It is not a school census, a pupil headcount, or a named-LEA roster. Do not invent contractors or award recipients to fill the gap. Campaign donations on FEC tables do not fund this USAspending cell; the datasets are separate.

Geography is AL-02, not a facility map

Alabama 2nd District (AL-02) on this join is a USAspending geography field, not a claim that every dollar was disbursed to residents of that district. Awards can list AL-02 while later work occurs elsewhere. Awards tagged to other Alabama districts belong on those ties even when the CFDA is also 84.010. Alabama 2nd District (AL-02) is a numbered congressional place-of-performance code inside Alabama. Other Alabama districts are separate joins even when they reuse CFDA 84.010. Alabama 2nd District (AL-02) is not Alabama 3rd (SSDI) or Alabama 5th (VA disability). Those Alabama pairs use different CFDA numbers.

Alabama federal spending shows how CFDA 84.010 sits beside other programs in the same state extract. $606,071,919 is one district-program column, not the state table. This packet does not split Alabama 2nd District (AL-02) by county, city, or census tract. Awards that carry a different CFDA stay on those other ties even if the work sounds related to Title I Grants To Local Educational Agencies. The district-wide obligation total published here is $21,388,752,151.47; $606,071,919 is the Title I slice of that denominator.

Commitment totals versus cash paid

USAspending.gov records an obligation when the federal government commits funds on an award. $606,071,919 is that kind of sum for Title I Grants To Local Educational Agencies inside AL-02 coding. Later deobligations, recoveries, or payment schedules can change what leaves the Treasury without this join rewriting itself into a cash register. Assistance and contract awards can share the same CFDA rollup; this packet does not split them. Net obligations can include downward adjustments. This page reports $606,071,919 as given.

Keeping both sides of the 84.010 × AL-02 pair

Cite USAspending.gov: Title I Grants To Local Educational Agencies (CFDA 84.010) obligated $606,071,919 on 2 awards coded to Alabama 2nd District (AL-02). Name Title I Grants To Local Educational Agencies and Alabama 2nd District (AL-02) together. Keep the obligation word. If Alabama 2nd District or CFDA 84.010 has refreshed, prefer the live hub over this snapshot for current rows. The pair is not a school census, a pupil headcount, or a named-LEA roster. 2.8% of $21,388,752,151.47 is the district share on this packet, not a performance score. Maryland 7th also hosts a Title I pair on this slice. Same CFDA 84.010, different geography, separate obligation sums.

Share, mean, and what they are not

Two awards against a six-hundred-six-million-dollar Title I cell is extreme concentration. Recipients remain unpublished. A large row count makes a project split tempting; the packet still does not supply one. A small row count makes a named-facility story tempting; the packet still does not name facilities or contractors. The implied mean (about $303,035,959.50) and the district share (2.8% of $21,388,752,151.47) are ratios of packet facts. Prefer Alabama 2nd District and CFDA 84.010 if the live tables moved.

Do not rank Alabama 2nd District (AL-02) as more Title I-dependent than neighboring districts on the strength of this cell alone. Neighboring geographies have their own 84.010 ties with different dollar totals, or no published 84.010 cell in this harvest. This snapshot holds $606,071,919 and 2 only. All spending ties is the index, not an addend. Obligations are not outlays. Correlation is not causation.

Questions

How much Title I spending is coded to Alabama 2nd District (AL-02)?
USAspending.gov lists $606,071,919 in Title I Grants To Local Educational Agencies obligations across 2 awards with place of performance in Alabama 2nd District (AL-02). CFDA 84.010 × AL-02 is an obligation join, not an outlay and not Alabama’s complete federal ledger. The cell is 2.8% of the district’s published total ($21,388,752,151.47). Unique recipients are unpublished. Average obligation is about $303,035,959.50, a ratio of those two facts only.
Does $606,071,919 include every Title I project in AL-02?
The packet publishes one CFDA rollup. The packet does not split school districts inside the geography and does not publish a pupil denominator. $606,071,919 is the combined obligation sum for CFDA 84.010 inside AL-02 coding. This page will not invent a project pie or name contractors. Open CFDA 84.010 and Alabama 2nd District to inspect parent tables. 2 remains an action count, not a count of schools, LEAs, or pupils.
Is $606,071,919 cash already paid in Alabama 2nd District (AL-02)?
No. Obligations are commitments recorded on USAspending.gov awards. Outlays — money that actually left the Treasury — are a different concept and are not this packet’s headline. Treating $606,071,919 as checks already cleared in Alabama 2nd District (AL-02) confuses those terms. Later ingests can revise 2 awards. Prefer the live district and program hubs if the tables moved.
How does this Title I cell relate to Alabama statewide spending?
Alabama federal spending is the Alabama statewide extract across programs. $606,071,919 is the Title I Grants To Local Educational Agencies amount inside Alabama 2nd District (AL-02) only, not the statewide Title I total. Adding Alabama federal spending to $606,071,919 double-counts. CFDA 84.010 nationwide lives on CFDA 84.010. This join is 84.010 × AL-02.

USAspending.gov congressional district place-of-performance joined to CFDA program. Obligations are not outlays.