Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies obligations in Michigan
Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies (CFDA 84.010) show $1,673,343,531 in USAspending.gov obligations coded to Michigan across 3 awards. The pair is an ESEA Title I catalog line joined to place of performance, not a ranking of Detroit-area districts and not a count of Title I schools. Obligations are commitments, not outlays. The Michigan × 84.010 overlay holds the rows.
Key figures
- CFDA 84.010 shows $1,673,343,531 in USAspending obligations in Michigan.
- Award count is 3; implied mean about $558 million.
- The join is program × place of performance, not a district poverty ranking.
- Figures are obligations, not outlays.
Three SEA records carry Michigan’s Title I cell
This tie keeps USAspending assistance where CFDA 84.010 meets Michigan place of performance. The dollar book is $1,673,343,531. The award count is 3. Title I, Part A formula funds commonly post as a handful of awards to the state educational agency. Three prime records do not mean three districts received the entire sum, and they do not isolate Wayne County from the Upper Peninsula.
The join does not prove that Michigan’s census poverty, industrial-city concentration, or school-count caused $1,673,343,531. Those are other series. This packet has no LEA list. Correlation is not causation.
A reader who treats the cell as Michigan’s full federal education total has left the CFDA-by-state definition. Special Education Grants to States (CFDA 84.027) is a different cell on the same statewide stack. The 3 figure is a record count, including modifications, not a count of eligible children.
A three-row tape versus the IDEA five-row tape
Three awards under $1,673,343,531 imply a mean near $557,781,177 per award. That average is an artifact of SEA-level filing, not a typical district Title I grant. The packet has no median.
Michigan’s IDEA cell on this site posts a different award count on a different catalog number. Do not add the two cells together from memory—open each overlay. Cite Title I’s own columns. USAspending.gov is the source; SpendingVault does not recast the mean as a Detroit Public Schools allocation.
Michigan’s 84.010 cell versus parent rollups
Michigan’s state hub stacks every CFDA with performance coded to the state. Title I is one education line. $1,673,343,531 is not Michigan’s all-program total. The nationwide CFDA 84.010 page includes every state, so it is not this cell.
Place-of-performance on an SEA Title I award usually sits on Michigan even when classrooms are local. This packet does not reallocate dollars to LEAs. Read the overlay as a coding view of 3 awards.
Obligations versus school-year spending
The $1,673,343,531 figure is an obligation sum. SEA and LEA drawdowns can trail the federal obligation. SpendingVault does not publish a 84.010-in-Michigan outlay total in this packet. Mixing M-STEP scores or poverty rates with this award file leaves the USAspending series.
Cite the join as CFDA 84.010 × Michigan, $1,673,343,531, 3 awards, obligations only.
Overlay and parent hubs
The Michigan × Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies overlay is the table view. Recipient slices on that hub still sum toward $1,673,343,531 on 3 awards. The Michigan spending page and the CFDA 84.010 program page are the parents. The Michigan programs index and the ties index list other pairs.
None of those links convert the cell into school counts or into outlays this packet omits.
What Michigan Title I is not
Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies in Michigan are not a ranking of Detroit-area districts and not a count of Title I schools. The $1,673,343,531 figure is the CFDA 84.010 × Michigan cell. Three awards describe SEA-level filing, not three LEAs. IDEA Part B in Michigan is a different catalog number with a five-award tape; do not add 84.010 and 84.027 from memory.
Office of Science financial assistance and BEAD also sit on Michigan’s statewide stack with different award-count patterns. Cite Title I and Michigan together, keep the obligation label, and keep the 3-award count. LEA subgrants can lag the federal obligation. Later bulk files can revise both dollars and the record count.
Michigan’s Title I cell also does not include district allocation runs, schoolwide flags, or Detroit-versus-Upper-Peninsula splits. Those files live with the SEA. SpendingVault cites USAspending.gov obligations only: CFDA 84.010 × Michigan, $1,673,343,531, 3 awards. If a later extract changes the three-row tape, the implied mean near $557,781,177 moves with it. Quote the packet facts and the overlay path rather than a district story.
Questions
- How much Title I spending is in Michigan?
- USAspending.gov shows $1,673,343,531 in CFDA 84.010 obligations coded to Michigan across 3 awards. The join uses the program number and Michigan place of performance. The total is obligations, not outlays.
- Why only 3 awards for $1.67 billion?
- Title I formula funds often post as a few prime awards to the state educational agency. The extract counts 3 records tagged to CFDA 84.010 and Michigan. The implied mean is about $557,781,177 per award. That mean is not a typical LEA allocation.
- Is $1.67 billion Michigan’s full federal education spending?
- No. $1,673,343,531 is only the Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies cell. Other CFDA programs with Michigan place of performance sit on the statewide hub. Nationwide 84.010 is not limited to Michigan.
- Do these obligations equal cash spent in classrooms?
- No. $1,673,343,531 is an obligation sum. Outlays are a different USAspending series. LEA subgrants can lag the federal obligation.
USAspending.gov CFDA program aggregates by place of performance state. Obligations are not outlays.