Skip to main content
← All data ties

Title I LEA grants in Washington 10th District (WA-10)

The Title I × WA-10 cell on USAspending.gov is $610,630,171 in obligations across 2 awards. Two Title I awards equal about five percent of WA-10’s district obligation total, a thin education file inside a twelve-billion-dollar district book. That pair is Title I Grants To Local Educational Agencies and Washington 10th District (WA-10) — not Washington’s entire federal inflow, not Title I Grants To Local Educational Agencies nationwide, and not cash already paid. The cell is 5.0% of this district’s published obligation total ($12,185,220,009.15). Implied average obligation is about $305,315,085.50 ($610,630,171 ÷ 2). Correlation is not causation.

Key figures

  • Title I in Washington 10th District (WA-10): $610,630,171 across 2 USAspending awards.
  • Implied mean about $305,315,085.50 per record; district share 5.0% of $12,185,220,009.15.
  • CFDA 84.010 × WA-10 is an obligation join, not an outlay and not a named-recipient list.
  • Cite USAspending.gov; quote Washington 10th District and CFDA 84.010 if live tables moved.
  • Washington federal spending and All spending ties are parents and an index, not amounts to add into $610,630,171.

A place-of-performance join: Title I × WA-10

CFDA 84.010 and congressional district WA-10 meet here. $610,630,171 is the USAspending.gov obligation sum on awards that carry both tags. It is not Title I Grants To Local Educational Agencies’s nationwide total, not every federal dollar coded to Washington 10th District (WA-10), and not an outlay register. The packet does not split school districts inside the geography and does not publish a pupil denominator. 2 is an action count: modifications and repeat awards add rows. Unique recipients are unpublished. It is not a school census, a pupil headcount, or a named-LEA roster.

Dividing $610,630,171 by 2 yields about $305,315,085.50 per award on average. That ratio is two packet facts. It is not a typical per-pupil allocation or a posted per-school figure. Two awards against a six-hundred-eleven-million-dollar Title I cell is extreme concentration. Do not invent two named LEAs. Do not treat WA-10’s 84.010 cell as a synonym for every Title I account nationwide. Open Washington 10th District for the district table without this program filter, CFDA 84.010 for CFDA 84.010 without the WA-10 filter, Washington federal spending for every program in the Washington extract, and All spending ties for the rest of the join list. Quote those hubs as parents, not as addends to $610,630,171.

Title I Grants To Local Educational Agencies as a CFDA tag, not as a named-vendor list

USAspending labels CFDA 84.010 as Title I Grants To Local Educational Agencies. That catalog number produced $610,630,171 when crossed with Washington 10th District (WA-10) place of performance. The program-wide 84.010 hub does not require WA-10 geography. The district hub does not require Title I. Only this tie applies both filters, which is why it cites 2 awards. The packet does not split school districts inside the geography and does not publish a pupil denominator.

Correlation is not causation: Washington 10th District (WA-10) did not “cause” $610,630,171 by existing as a large or small place. Population, outcome scores, and named facilities are not packet facts. The join is 84.010 × WA-10 only. It is not a school census, a pupil headcount, or a named-LEA roster. Do not invent contractors or award recipients to fill the gap. Campaign donations on FEC tables do not fund this USAspending cell; the datasets are separate.

Place of performance for Washington 10th District (WA-10)

Washington 10th District (WA-10) on this join is a USAspending geography field, not a claim that every dollar was disbursed to residents of that district. Awards can list WA-10 while later work occurs elsewhere. Awards tagged to other Washington districts belong on those ties even when the CFDA is also 84.010. Washington 10th District (WA-10) is a numbered congressional place-of-performance code inside Washington. Other Washington districts are separate joins even when they reuse CFDA 84.010. Washington 10th District (WA-10) is a numbered USAspending geography inside Washington. Other Washington districts are not this join.

Obligation math for this join

USAspending.gov records an obligation when the federal government commits funds on an award. $610,630,171 is that kind of sum for Title I Grants To Local Educational Agencies inside WA-10 coding. Later deobligations, recoveries, or payment schedules can change what leaves the Treasury without this join rewriting itself into a cash register. Assistance and contract awards can share the same CFDA rollup; this packet does not split them. Net obligations can include downward adjustments. This page reports $610,630,171 as given.

Washington’s own budget is a separate ledger. Mixing it with the 2-row Title I cell leaves USAspending.gov. Treat 2 as award records in the aggregate, not unique vendors. 2 is not a count of schools, LEAs, or pupils. Do not annualize without a year field in the packet. Do not per-capita or per-recipient the dollar total; those denominators are unpublished. The implied mean ($305,315,085.50) is a concentration statistic, not a typical per-pupil allocation or a posted per-school figure.

What a complete citation includes

Cite USAspending.gov: Title I Grants To Local Educational Agencies (CFDA 84.010) obligated $610,630,171 on 2 awards coded to Washington 10th District (WA-10). Name Title I Grants To Local Educational Agencies and Washington 10th District (WA-10) together. Keep the obligation word. If Washington 10th District or CFDA 84.010 has refreshed, prefer the live hub over this snapshot for current rows. The pair is not a school census, a pupil headcount, or a named-LEA roster. 5.0% of $12,185,220,009.15 is the district share on this packet, not a performance score. Alabama 2nd also hosts a Title I pair on this slice. Same CFDA 84.010, different geography, separate obligation sums.

Using 5.0% and $305,315,085.50 without overclaiming

Two awards against a six-hundred-eleven-million-dollar Title I cell is extreme concentration. Do not invent two named LEAs. A large row count makes a project split tempting; the packet still does not supply one. A small row count makes a named-facility story tempting; the packet still does not name facilities or contractors. The implied mean (about $305,315,085.50) and the district share (5.0% of $12,185,220,009.15) are ratios of packet facts. Prefer Washington 10th District and CFDA 84.010 if the live tables moved.

Do not rank Washington 10th District (WA-10) as more Title I-dependent than neighboring districts on the strength of this cell alone. Neighboring geographies have their own 84.010 ties with different dollar totals, or no published 84.010 cell in this harvest. This snapshot holds $610,630,171 and 2 only. All spending ties is the index, not an addend. Obligations are not outlays. Correlation is not causation.

Questions

How much Title I spending is coded to Washington 10th District (WA-10)?
USAspending.gov lists $610,630,171 in Title I Grants To Local Educational Agencies obligations across 2 awards with place of performance in Washington 10th District (WA-10). CFDA 84.010 × WA-10 is an obligation join, not an outlay and not Washington’s complete federal ledger. The cell is 5.0% of the district’s published total ($12,185,220,009.15). Unique recipients are unpublished. Average obligation is about $305,315,085.50, a ratio of those two facts only.
Does $610,630,171 include every Title I project in WA-10?
The packet publishes one CFDA rollup. The packet does not split school districts inside the geography and does not publish a pupil denominator. $610,630,171 is the combined obligation sum for CFDA 84.010 inside WA-10 coding. This page will not invent a project pie or name contractors. Open CFDA 84.010 and Washington 10th District to inspect parent tables. 2 remains an action count, not a count of schools, LEAs, or pupils.
Is $610,630,171 cash already paid in Washington 10th District (WA-10)?
No. Obligations are commitments recorded on USAspending.gov awards. Outlays — money that actually left the Treasury — are a different concept and are not this packet’s headline. Treating $610,630,171 as checks already cleared in Washington 10th District (WA-10) confuses those terms. Later ingests can revise 2 awards. Prefer the live district and program hubs if the tables moved.
Is Washington 10th District (WA-10) ranked against other Washington districts here?
No. This page does not rank Washington 10th District (WA-10) as a winner or loser. $610,630,171 and 2 describe one join. Neighboring districts have their own cells. District 90/98 placeholders are omitted. Cite Title I Grants To Local Educational Agencies and Washington 10th District (WA-10) together without a league table.

USAspending.gov congressional district place-of-performance joined to CFDA program. Obligations are not outlays.