IHS Tribal Self-Governance compact funding in Alaska
Tribal Self-Governance Program: IHS Compacts/Funding Agreements (CFDA 93.210) obligations coded to Alaska total $16,097,920,227.71 on USAspending.gov across 43 awards. The join is an Indian Health Service self-governance Catalog number plus an Alaska place-of-performance tag. It is not a census of Alaska Native beneficiaries, not a village-by-village budget, and not cash already spent in clinics. Forty-three compact actions on an AK tag are a USAspending grain, not a village census and not a finding that Alaska ‘got more IHS’ than a state with fewer rows.
Key figures
- Alaska IHS self-governance (CFDA 93.210): $16,097,920,227.71 on 43 USAspending awards.
- The implied mean is about $374,370,200 per award; tribes and clinics are not named in the packet.
- 43 actions are not 43 tribes or 43 villages.
- Cite obligations, not visits or outlays; no fiscal year is attached.
- The join is 93.210 × AK, not a regional health ranking.
Compacts on an Alaska geography tag
USAspending assistance rows labeled TRIBAL SELF-GOVERNANCE PROGRAM: IHS COMPACTS/FUNDING AGREEMENTS with place of performance Alaska (AK) sum to $16,097,920,227.71 and number 43. Self-governance compacts and funding agreements are the statutory vehicles that let participating tribes and tribal organizations operate IHS programs. The extract counts award actions with that CFDA, not the number of tribes in Alaska.
The implied mean is about $374,370,200 per award. Compact vehicles can be large and multi-year. The packet does not name compacting tribes, service units, or facilities. This page will not guess those names from the dollar total.
Alaska federal spending is every CFDA on an AK tag. CFDA 93.210 is the national self-governance program file. Tribal Self-Governance Program: Ihs Compacts/Funding Agreements in Alaska is the overlap. Alaska programs and All spending ties sit beside it.
Alaska Native regional health entities often hold large compact vehicles. That institutional background is not a packet field. $16,097,920,227.71 still does not name those entities. Open the overlay for recipient names.
IHS compacting is not Bureau of Indian Affairs compacting. Other self-governance Catalog numbers are outside CFDA 93.210. Do not merge them into the Alaska cell.
Place of performance is not a clinic map
An AK tag can follow a compacting organization’s address, a statewide tribal health entity, or a service geography. Care delivered in a village can be billed through a compact whose prime award carries a different coding. Conversely, an Alaska-tagged award can support administration that is not a patient visit. $16,097,920,227.71 is not a list of clinics.
Other IHS Catalog numbers — direct federal operations, facilities, or sanitation — are not 93.210. Folding them into this cell would be a new extract. Title V compacting is the only program in this join.
Forty-three awards are thicker than a SNAP-style three-row file and thinner than a highway file with thousands of projects. Texture describes the prime table, not the quality of health services.
Weather, air ambulance, and village clinic logistics are real operational issues and are not columns here. This page will not convert 43 awards into a logistics grade.
Obligations versus services delivered
Quote $16,097,920,227.71 as USAspending obligations for CFDA 93.210 in Alaska. Do not quote it as outpatient visits, prescriptions filled, or construction completed. Outlays and clinical statistics are other systems.
No fiscal year is in the facts. Do not attach one. The source is USAspending.gov CFDA program aggregates by place of performance state.
Multi-year compact funding can make obligations look front-loaded relative to services delivered later. That timing gap is why obligations are not outlays.
Statewide Alaska, not a regional corporation split
This packet does not split 43 awards or $16,097,920,227.71 by ANCSA region, borough, or census area. A regional health-system story needs a different table. The extract stays statewide.
Do not rank Alaska’s tribal health system against other states from this cell. Compact participation, geography, and IHS budget structure differ. Correlation with other Alaska program cells is not causation.
Southeast, Southcentral, and the Arctic share AK. A regional corporation story needs a different table. Statewide is the only geography in the facts.
How to cite the Alaska IHS compact join
Quote USAspending.gov: Tribal Self-Governance Program: IHS Compacts/Funding Agreements (CFDA 93.210) obligated $16,097,920,227.71 on 43 awards coded to Alaska. Name the program and the state together.
The overlay Tribal Self-Governance Program: Ihs Compacts/Funding Agreements in Alaska is the live pair. This JSON is the packet snapshot.
How to keep the Alaska compact citation honest
Name Tribal Self-Governance Program: IHS Compacts/Funding Agreements, CFDA 93.210, Alaska, $16,097,920,227.71, 43 awards, and USAspending obligations in one sentence.
Do not add the Oklahoma or Arizona 93.210 cells to this figure and call the sum national compacting. The national roll-up lives on CFDA 93.210.
Questions
- How much IHS self-governance funding is obligated in Alaska?
- USAspending.gov shows $16,097,920,227.71 across 43 awards for CFDA 93.210, Tribal Self-Governance Program: IHS Compacts/Funding Agreements, tagged to Alaska. That is an obligation join, not a clinic census.
- Does 43 awards mean 43 Alaska tribes?
- No. Forty-three is an award-action count. Compacts and funding agreements can cover multiple programs and years. Unique tribes and unique patients are not published in this packet.
- Is this all Indian Health Service spending in Alaska?
- No. Only CFDA 93.210 with an Alaska place-of-performance tag is in $16,097,920,227.71. Other IHS Catalog numbers sit on other program pages.
- Where is the live Alaska 93.210 table?
- Tribal Self-Governance Program: Ihs Compacts/Funding Agreements in Alaska. See also Alaska federal spending, Alaska programs, CFDA 93.210, and All spending ties.
USAspending.gov CFDA program aggregates by place of performance state. Obligations are not outlays.