Skip to main content
← All data ties

IHS Tribal Self-Governance compact funding in Oklahoma

Tribal Self-Governance Program: IHS Compacts/Funding Agreements (CFDA 93.210) obligations coded to Oklahoma total $13,249,515,309.61 on USAspending.gov across 32 awards. The join is the same IHS compact Catalog number that appears on the Alaska cell, attached here to an OK place-of-performance tag. Thirty-two actions are not 32 tribes, and $13,249,515,309.61 is not a patient census. Thirty-two Oklahoma compact actions are this state’s 93.210 grain, not a restatement of the Alaska cell and not a tribe count.

Key figures

  • Oklahoma IHS self-governance (CFDA 93.210): $13,249,515,309.61 on 32 USAspending awards.
  • The implied mean is about $414,047,400 per award; organizations are not named here.
  • 32 actions are not 32 tribes.
  • Cite obligations, not visits; no fiscal year is attached.
  • The join is 93.210 × OK, not a ranking against Alaska.

Self-governance vehicles on an Oklahoma tag

Filter USAspending to TRIBAL SELF-GOVERNANCE PROGRAM: IHS COMPACTS/FUNDING AGREEMENTS and to Oklahoma (OK). Thirty-two awards remain. They sum to $13,249,515,309.61. Title V compacting lets participating tribes and tribal organizations operate IHS programs under funding agreements. The extract counts those award actions, not Oklahoma’s tribal governments and not IHS direct-service sites that sit on other CFDA numbers.

The implied mean is about $414,047,400 per award. Compact vehicles can be large. The packet names neither compacting organizations nor facilities. This page will not fill those blanks from the dollar total.

Oklahoma federal spending is every CFDA on OK. CFDA 93.210 is the national compact file. Tribal Self-Governance Program: Ihs Compacts/Funding Agreements in Oklahoma is the overlap. Oklahoma programs and All spending ties are the indexes.

Oklahoma’s tribal health landscape includes compacting and non-compacting arrangements. Only CFDA 93.210 tagged OK is in $13,249,515,309.61. Direct IHS stays out unless it shares that number.

Open the overlay for recipient names. The facts object has state, CFDA, dollars, and 32. That is the citation set.

Oklahoma is not a restatement of the Alaska 93.210 cell

Alaska’s 93.210 join is a different geography with its own award count and dollar total. Do not add $13,249,515,309.61 to the Alaska figure and call the sum ‘national IHS compacting.’ The national roll-up lives on CFDA 93.210. This page is OK only.

Place-of-performance can follow a tribal health entity’s address. Care delivered in one county can be administered under a compact tagged OK; work tagged to another state would not appear. Thirty-two rows are not a clinic map of Indian Country in Oklahoma.

Direct IHS operations, sanitation facilities, and urban Indian health Catalog numbers are outside $13,249,515,309.61. Folding them in changes the join.

Urban Indian health programs, if separately catalogued, are not this join. Do not fold them into the 32-row file.

Obligations versus care delivered

Quote $13,249,515,309.61 as USAspending obligations for CFDA 93.210 in Oklahoma. Do not quote it as visits, prescriptions, or construction completed. Outlays and clinical reports are other systems.

No fiscal year is in the facts. Do not attach one. Cite USAspending.gov CFDA aggregates by place of performance state.

Compact funding agreements can span multiple budget years. Obligations can look large relative to a single year’s clinical output. That is a timing caveat, not a quality judgment.

Statewide OK, not an eastern-versus-western split

This packet does not split 32 awards or $13,249,515,309.61 by tribal jurisdiction or county. A nation-by-nation story needs a different table. The extract stays statewide.

Do not rank Oklahoma’s tribal health system against Alaska or Arizona from these cells. Compact participation and geography differ. Correlation is not causation.

Eastern and western Oklahoma share OK. Nation-by-nation maps are a different dataset. Statewide is the only geography here.

Citation line

Quote USAspending.gov: Tribal Self-Governance Program: IHS Compacts/Funding Agreements (CFDA 93.210) obligated $13,249,515,309.61 on 32 awards coded to Oklahoma. Name the program and Oklahoma together.

The overlay Tribal Self-Governance Program: Ihs Compacts/Funding Agreements in Oklahoma is the live pair.

Oklahoma is a separate 93.210 join

Do not add $13,249,515,309.61 to Alaska’s compact cell and call the sum national IHS compacting. The national file is CFDA 93.210.

Tribal Self-Governance Program: Ihs Compacts/Funding Agreements in Oklahoma is the live overlay.

Oklahoma’s 32 compact actions are not Alaska’s 43 and not Arizona’s 10. Each 93.210 join keeps its own geography tag and its own dollar total. $13,249,515,309.61 is the Oklahoma cell. Compact participation, direct IHS, and urban Indian programs that use other Catalog numbers stay outside unless they share 93.210. Nation names are unpublished. Cite obligations, not clinic visits, and do not rank Oklahoma’s tribal health system from this extract.

Questions

How much IHS self-governance funding is obligated in Oklahoma?
USAspending.gov shows $13,249,515,309.61 across 32 awards for CFDA 93.210 tagged to Oklahoma. That is an obligation join, not a count of tribes or patients.
Does 32 awards mean 32 Oklahoma tribes?
No. Thirty-two is an award-action count. Compacts can cover multiple programs and years. Unique tribes and unique patients are not in this packet.
Is this all IHS spending in Oklahoma?
No. Only CFDA 93.210 with an Oklahoma place-of-performance tag is in $13,249,515,309.61. Other IHS Catalog numbers sit on other pages.
Where is the live Oklahoma 93.210 table?
Tribal Self-Governance Program: Ihs Compacts/Funding Agreements in Oklahoma. See also Oklahoma federal spending, Oklahoma programs, CFDA 93.210, and All spending ties.

USAspending.gov CFDA program aggregates by place of performance state. Obligations are not outlays.