Unemployment Insurance federal funding in New Hampshire
Unemployment Insurance (CFDA 17.225) shows $120,298,429.77 in USAspending.gov obligations with New Hampshire as place of performance. Twenty-three awards sit behind that total. The join is a DOL unemployment-insurance listing crossed with a state location field, not the state's entire labor budget and not a census of claimants, weekly checks, or employers. The dollars are commitments, not Treasury outlays.
Key figures
- CFDA 17.225 in New Hampshire shows $120,298,429.77 in USAspending obligations on twenty-three awards.
- Twenty-three awards are UI rows, not a claimant census.
- The join is Unemployment Insurance plus New Hampshire place of performance, not every DOL listing.
- The total is commitments, not weekly checks already mailed.
New Hampshire x 17.225 is a unemployment-insurance join, not a census
This page pairs CFDA 17.225, UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE, with New Hampshire place of performance. The listing is the federal Unemployment Insurance assistance line as USAspending stores it, not a state UI weekly-claims dashboard. SpendingVault sums tagged obligations: $120,298,429.77 on twenty-three awards. The extract does not list claimants, weekly checks, or employers. Treat the pair as a catalog intersection, not a ranking of which state has more need, and not a claim that twenty-three awards equal twenty-three separate local offices.
Trade Adjustment Assistance, workforce grants, or different DOL listings sit outside $120,298,429.77 unless they also carry 17.225. Mixing UI with those other labor lines would invent a combined jobs figure the packet never computed. Correlation between this obligation sum and unemployment rates is not causation. Unemployment-rate figures are not in the packet. Place of performance as New Hampshire locates the tagged awards; it does not deposit the tagged dollars onto claimant debit cards. New Hampshire is a small-state place-of-performance tag on the awards, not a claim that the program exists only there.
Twenty-three awards behind $120.3 million
Award count is a row count of assistance awards, including possible continuations, amendments, and payment-file batches. It is not a census of claimants, weekly checks, or employers. Mean obligation is about $5,230,366.51 if $120,298,429.77 were divided evenly across twenty-three lines — a mechanical ratio, not a published weekly benefit, and not a typical claim size. The packet has no regular-versus-extended-benefit split inside 17.225.
Twenty-three lines belong on the overlay table, not in a narrative roster. This page will not invent recipient names. Open Unemployment Insurance in New Hampshire for the stored table. Do not convert twenty-three into a map of New Hampshire sites. The $120,298,429.77 total remains an obligation rollup on tagged awards. Inspect named lines rather than inferring a census. Twenty-three lines are scannable on the overlay; that still does not make them a local-office map.
UI obligations are not weekly checks already mailed
Unemployment Insurance awards often obligate as federal UI accounts are charged and draw as states pay benefits or run administration. The $120,298,429.77 headline is the obligation sum, not a punch-list of people who received a check and not a Treasury outlay total. No fiscal year is attached. An allocation table dated to a particular year is not automatically this join unless it uses CFDA 17.225, New Hampshire geography, and the obligation metric.
The listing title is Unemployment Insurance. This extract does not split federal UI administration from benefit funding, and it does not split regular from pandemic-era rows if both share 17.225. Those cuts would require award documentation beyond dollars, twenty-three awards, CFDA 17.225, and New Hampshire. This page will not invent a share. Workforce Innovation listings sit on different CFDA numbers.
What the New Hampshire 17.225 table omits
The extract has no claimant count, no weekly-benefit table, and no employer list. Facts remain $120,298,429.77, twenty-three awards, CFDA 17.225, and New Hampshire. This page will not invent a ranking against other states' 17.225 joins. State UI trust-fund balances are a different shelf, not a USAspending subset of this join.
New Hampshire federal spending and New Hampshire programs place 17.225 among other listings. CFDA 17.225 is the national catalog line. All spending ties indexes other CFDA x state pairs. Mixing those shelves would invent a share of DOL spending the packet never computed. The $120,298,429.77 figure is the tagged pair only. Twenty-three awards remain UI administrative and benefit-related rows, not a census of claimants, weekly checks, or employers.
Where the 17.225 x New Hampshire overlay lives
Start with Unemployment Insurance in New Hampshire for the twenty-three-award table behind $120,298,429.77. CFDA 17.225 is the nationwide listing. New Hampshire federal spending and New Hampshire programs give state context. All spending ties is the shelf for other program-by-state joins on the same obligation metric. Twenty-three awards totaling $120,298,429.77 remain UI administrative and benefit-related rows, not a census of claimants, weekly checks, or employers. Names, unit counts, and per-unit amounts are omitted because they are not in the facts. Read the overlay rows as stored; this page will not invent a New Hampshire budget share.
How to read the New Hampshire × CFDA 17.225 pair
A ties page exists because two tables meet. One table is the assistance listing (CFDA 17.225). The other is place of performance as New Hampshire. The headline $120,298,429.77 is the obligation sum on that intersection. It is not a forecast, not a budget request, and not an outlay. It is also not a claim that CFDA 17.225 caused New Hampshire's economy to grow, or that New Hampshire caused CFDA 17.225 awards to exist. Correlation between geography and a catalog code is the join — nothing more.
Use the internal links to step off this pair: the statewide spending shelf, the national program listing, the state's other programs, and the ties index. Each of those pages uses the same obligation metric unless a page says otherwise. If you need award-level names, open the overlay rather than treating this narrative as a recipient directory. If you need a different metric — outlays, current-year only, or a different geography — that metric is not in this packet. Do not annualize $120,298,429.77 into a per-year run rate: no fiscal year is in the facts. USAspending.gov remains the source; SpendingVault republishes the join.
Questions
- How much Unemployment Insurance funding is obligated in New Hampshire?
- USAspending.gov shows $120,298,429.77 in obligations for CFDA 17.225 with New Hampshire as place of performance, across twenty-three awards. The sum is a commitment total on assistance awards, not outlays and not the state's entire labor budget. Other listings are outside this join unless they also carry 17.225.
- Do 23 awards mean 23 New Hampshire UI claimants?
- No. Award count is a row count of assistance awards and can include administrative lines and continuations. It is not a claimant or weekly-check census. The packet does not name claimants. See the New Hampshire 17.225 overlay for named lines as USAspending stored them.
- Is this New Hampshire's entire federal labor funding?
- No. The join is CFDA 17.225, Unemployment Insurance, crossed with New Hampshire place of performance. Other DOL listings use different CFDA numbers. Those dollars are not inside $120,298,429.77 unless the award also carries 17.225. Remaining balances are not in the facts.
- Is $120.3 million already paid as New Hampshire unemployment checks?
- Not on this metric. Obligations are recorded commitments on assistance awards. Outlays are payments from the Treasury. The $120,298,429.77 headline is the obligation rollup in SpendingVault's extract. Weekly benefit payments are not published in this packet. Remaining balances are not in the facts.
USAspending.gov CFDA program aggregates by place of performance state. Obligations are not outlays.