Skip to main content
← All data ties

Universal Service Fund High Cost in Alabama

CFDA 32.002 crossed with Alabama produces $370,841,725.18 in USAspending.gov obligations on 34 awards. Universal Service Fund - High Cost is the catalog title. The join is not every federal dollar in Alabama and not a named carrier roster and not the Arkansas, Mississippi, North Dakota, or Oregon 32.002 joins. A even split would be about $10,907,109.56 per award. Amounts are obligations, not outlays.

Key figures

  • CFDA 32.002 shows $370,841,725.18 in Alabama obligations on 34 awards.
  • The mean is about $10,907,109.56 per award.
  • The catalog is Universal Service Fund - High Cost, not a named carrier roster and not the Arkansas, Mississippi, North Dakota, or Oregon 32.002 joins.
  • Alabama is a place-of-performance tag, not a unit census.
  • Figures are obligations, not outlays.

The obligation sum on this Alabama catalog join

USAspending.gov CFDA program aggregates by place-of-performance state produce this Alabama row for Universal Service Fund - High Cost. The published obligation sum is $370,841,725.18 on 34 awards. The join is not a named carrier roster and not the Arkansas, Mississippi, North Dakota, or Oregon 32.002 joins.

Do not treat $370,841,725.18 as Alabama’s entire federal budget. Do not treat it as the national 32.002 total. Correlation is not causation. Campaign-finance tables remain a separate dataset.

Keep Universal Service Fund - High Cost and Alabama together. Alabama Rural Rental Assistance (10.427) is a USDA catalog, not this FCC high-cost line. Overlay /states/al/programs/32.002/ applies both filters; the other listed hubs do not.

Alabama high-cost universal service as a CFDA row

On the program side, the packet gives four facts: Universal Service Fund - High Cost, CFDA 32.002, $370,841,725.18, and 34 awards. UNIVERSAL SERVICE FUND - HIGH COST is the uppercase listing title. That is the full program inventory for this file. No recipient names appear.

The page is not a named carrier roster and not the Arkansas, Mississippi, North Dakota, or Oregon 32.002 joins. Neighbor-state Universal Service Fund - High Cost joins are other pairs, not addends for $370,841,725.18. A 32.002 award with a different state tag is outside this cell even if the work looks related.

Readers comparing Alabama to other states should open those other state-program pages rather than inferring a rank from $370,841,725.18. This file does not publish a national share or a year-over-year change because those figures are not in the packet.

Alabama place of performance on CFDA 32.002

Geography here is the USAspending place-of-performance state field set to Alabama. It is not a county map, not a Birmingham, Montgomery, or Huntsville split, and not a recipient-address file. $370,841,725.18 does not allocate among those cities.

Awards can carry a AL tag and still involve work that later moves. This packet does not track that movement. Neighbor states — Tennessee, Georgia, Florida, and Mississippi — are outside the sum.

Assistance awards coded to CFDA 32.002 can include grants, cooperative agreements, or other USAspending award types. The packet does not break $370,841,725.18 out by award type, so this copy does not either.

Thirty-four awards, not 34 named carriers

Divide $370,841,725.18 by 34 and the implied average is about $10,907,109.56. That figure is not a median, not a mode, and not a typical household or vendor payment. 34 records are not 34 carriers, exchanges, or named projects.

The packet lists no contractor names. Do not invent them to explain the average. Keep the count labeled as awards.

If a dashboard elsewhere shows a different total for Universal Service Fund - High Cost in Alabama, check whether that dashboard uses outlays, a different year, or a recipient-location field instead of place of performance. This cell uses the packet’s obligation sum of $370,841,725.18 on 34 awards.

What universal service fund - high cost in Alabama will not prove

Do not convert $370,841,725.18 into carriers, exchanges, or named projects. Do not convert 34 awards into 34 carriers, exchanges, or named projects. Do not attach a fiscal year the packet omitted. Do not rank Alabama as a winner or loser among states.

Original filings remain on USAspending.gov. This copy restates the join only. Obligations of $370,841,725.18 are not outlays.

Parent hubs for 32.002 in Alabama

Use /states/al/programs/32.002/ (Universal Service Fund - High Cost in Alabama) for the overlay, /programs/32.002/ (CFDA 32.002) for the listing, /states/al/ (Alabama federal spending) for the state hub, /states/al/programs/ (Alabama programs) for the program index, and /ties/ (All spending ties) for other pairs. Cite CFDA 32.002, Alabama, $370,841,725.18, USAspending.gov, obligations only.

Keep Universal Service Fund - High Cost and Alabama together when citing $370,841,725.18. CFDA 32.002 lists 34 awards on this AL join. Obligations of $370,841,725.18 are not outlays. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov for this CFDA 32.002 × AL pair. Do not add parent hubs into this state-program cell. Mean dollars per action remain about $10,907,109.56 if you divide those two facts. AL is place of performance, not a split of Birmingham, Montgomery, or Huntsville. The join is not a named carrier roster and not the Arkansas, Mississippi, North Dakota, or Oregon 32.002 joins. Source note: USAspending.gov CFDA program aggregates by place of performance state. Obligations are not outlays.

Questions

How much Universal Service Fund - High Cost funding is obligated in Alabama?
USAspending.gov records $370,841,725.18 in CFDA 32.002 obligations with Alabama place of performance on 34 awards. That is the pair total, not an outlay and not a named carrier roster and not the Arkansas, Mississippi, North Dakota, or Oregon 32.002 joins. Keep Universal Service Fund - High Cost and Alabama together when citing $370,841,725.18. Cite both 32.002 and Alabama together.
Do 34 awards mean 34 carriers in Alabama?
No. 34 is a USAspending award-record count, not 34 carriers, exchanges, or named projects. The implied mean is about $10,907,109.56 per award. Unique recipients are unpublished. Obligations of $370,841,725.18 are not outlays. USAspending.gov remains the source for this 32.002 × AL pair.
Is this Alabama’s full federal spend for related programs?
No. $370,841,725.18 is only the CFDA 32.002 × Alabama cell. The join is not a named carrier roster and not the Arkansas, Mississippi, North Dakota, or Oregon 32.002 joins. Other catalogs appear on separate Alabama program pages. Nationwide 32.002 is not limited to Alabama. Mixing CFDA numbers would invent a larger total.
Where is the live 32.002 × Alabama table?
Universal Service Fund - High Cost in Alabama is the overlay at /states/al/programs/32.002/. CFDA 32.002 is /programs/32.002/. Alabama federal spending is /states/al/. Alabama programs is /states/al/programs/. All spending ties is /ties/. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov for this 32.002 × AL pair. Keep Universal Service Fund - High Cost and Alabama in the same citation.

USAspending.gov CFDA program aggregates by place of performance state. Obligations are not outlays.