Universal Service Fund High Cost in New Mexico

Twenty-two High Cost awards under a New Mexico tag

The headline number is $433,551,971.38. It sits on Universal Service Fund - High Cost crossed with New Mexico place of performance. Award count is 22. USAspending.gov is the source. The page is a JOIN, not a carrier, tower, or household census and not an outlay conversion.

Mean obligation is about $19,706,907.79 if $433,551,971.38 were split evenly across 22 lines — a mechanical ratio, not a typical carrier settlement and not a typical household subsidy. High-cost support awards and modifications often explain why a modest row count can still carry a nine-figure book. Recipients are omitted because they are not in the facts.

Santa Fe did not win the dollars by appearing as NM. Matching 32.002 to New Mexico is not a broadband-coverage ranking. Neighboring geographies (Texas, Arizona, or Colorado) have their own joins. The overlay is Universal Service Fund - High Cost in New Mexico.

CFDA 32.002 without becoming a tower map

Catalog language on the line is UNIVERSAL SERVICE FUND - HIGH COST. That title does not convert $433,551,971.38 into a grade of New Mexico's Universal Service Fund High Cost performance. CFDA 32.002 without a New Mexico filter is a different page.

FCC Universal Service Fund reports, Form 499 filings, and state broadband maps live elsewhere. Rural-carrier and tribal-broadband folklore is not stored on this packet. Affordable Connectivity, Lifeline, or BEAD listings would have to carry 32.002 to sit inside $433,551,971.38; they generally do not.

New Mexico's catalog besides Universal Service High Cost

New Mexico federal spending and New Mexico programs place 32.002 among other listings. Mixing those shelves would invent a share of Universal Service Fund High Cost spending the packet never computed. 22 awards remain assistance rows, not a census.

Santa Fe did not receive $433,551,971.38 as a named city appropriation. Albuquerque folklore is not a metro cut. Place of performance as NM locates tagged awards.

USF obligations are not household bills already credited

Keep the obligation word on $433,551,971.38 in every footnote. Outlays are unpublished here. Remaining balances, modifications as separate lines, and draw timing are not in the facts. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov.

Albuquerque-versus-rural folklore is not a county split. This extract has no carrier roster and no household count. Do not treat a state-level appropriations chart as this cell unless it uses CFDA 32.002, New Mexico geography, and the obligation metric.

How to cite the 32.002–New Mexico cell

Start with Universal Service Fund - High Cost in New Mexico for the 22-award table behind $433,551,971.38. Then step to CFDA 32.002 (nationwide), New Mexico federal spending, New Mexico programs, and All spending ties. Do not add those parents into the pair total.

Reuse the snapshot only with both keys: Universal Service Fund - High Cost and New Mexico. Later bulk files override dollars and counts. This narrative does not invent a fiscal year.

What 22 New Mexico High Cost rows will not be asked to prove

Correlation between a catalog code and a geography tag is the join — nothing more. FEC donations do not fund this USAspending cell. 22 awards totaling $433,551,971.38 will not be asked to prove a carrier, tower, or household census.

Albuquerque-versus-rural folklore is not a county split. This extract has no carrier roster and no household count. Keep Universal Service Fund - High Cost, New Mexico, $433,551,971.38, and 22 awards together in every reuse. Place of performance as NM locates the tagged awards; it does not prove every dollar stayed inside New Mexico after obligation. Santa Fe folklore is not a split of the 22 rows, and Albuquerque is not a named recipient of $433,551,971.38.

USAspending obligations can be positive new awards or net of downward modifications; $433,551,971.38 is the net total supplied in the facts. Treat 22 as a record count in an aggregate, not as 22 finished program years. Award modifications can sit beside base records in the same row count. The mean of about $19,706,907.79 per record will mislead anyone who treats it as a typical carrier settlement and not a typical household subsidy.

Questions

How much Universal Service Fund High Cost support is obligated in New Mexico?

USAspending.gov records $433,551,971.38 in CFDA 32.002 obligations across 22 awards coded to New Mexico. That is a program × state join, not an outlay and not New Mexico's full federal total. Keep both the program name and New Mexico in any citation.

Do 22 awards mean 22 New Mexico telecom carriers?

Award count is a row count. $433,551,971.38 ÷ 22 is about $19,706,907.79 per record as a mean, not a typical carrier settlement and not a typical household subsidy. High-cost support awards and modifications can dominate dollars. This packet does not list recipients. See Universal Service Fund - High Cost in New Mexico for the stored table.

Is this New Mexico's entire federal broadband book?

No. The $433,551,971.38 and 22 awards are USAspending.gov obligation records for CFDA 32.002 with a New Mexico geography tag. Affordable Connectivity, BEAD, and other FCC or NTIA listings use different CFDAs. Those dollars sit outside this join. Mixing those files with this join would invent a figure the packet does not support.

Where is the live New Mexico × 32.002 overlay?

Universal Service Fund - High Cost in New Mexico is the overlay. See New Mexico federal spending, New Mexico programs, CFDA 32.002, and All spending ties. Later bulk files override this snapshot. Keep the obligation label on $433,551,971.38. Do not invent a fiscal year.