Skip to main content
← All data ties

Universal Service Fund High Cost in North Dakota

The CFDA 32.002 catalog crossed with North Dakota produces $361,930,120.67 on 29 awards. UNIVERSAL SERVICE FUND - HIGH COST is the official listing title; Universal Service Fund - High Cost is the display name. This page is not a named carrier roster and not the Arkansas, Mississippi, Alabama, or Oregon 32.002 joins. A mean of about $12,480,348.99 is $361,930,120.67 divided by 29. Obligations are not outlays.

Key figures

  • CFDA 32.002 shows $361,930,120.67 in North Dakota obligations on 29 awards.
  • The mean is about $12,480,348.99 per award.
  • The catalog is Universal Service Fund - High Cost, not a named carrier roster and not the Arkansas, Mississippi, Alabama, or Oregon 32.002 joins.
  • North Dakota is a place-of-performance tag, not a unit census.
  • Figures are obligations, not outlays.

What this North Dakota program join records

$361,930,120.67 is the recorded obligation total for Universal Service Fund - High Cost with North Dakota place of performance. CFDA 32.002 is the catalog number. UNIVERSAL SERVICE FUND - HIGH COST is the official title string. The join is not a named carrier roster and not the Arkansas, Mississippi, Alabama, or Oregon 32.002 joins.

29 is an award-record count, not a census of carriers, exchanges, or named projects. About $12,480,348.99 per award if $361,930,120.67 were divided evenly is arithmetic, not a typical payment. Unique vendors are unpublished.

Campaign-finance tables do not fund these USAspending obligations. North Dakota telecom catalogs with other CFDA numbers are other cells. Keep the pair labeled as CFDA 32.002 × ND.

North Dakota high-cost USF as catalog text

Universal Service Fund - High Cost is a Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance line, not a story about a single office. CFDA 32.002 groups assistance that USAspending coded to that number. UNIVERSAL SERVICE FUND - HIGH COST is the official title. Packet facts do not list awarding sub-agencies.

The join is not a named carrier roster and not the Arkansas, Mississippi, Alabama, or Oregon 32.002 joins. North Dakota telecom catalogs with other CFDA numbers are other cells. Do not merge those other catalogs into $361,930,120.67. Do not invent carriers, exchanges, or named projects from the award count.

Readers comparing North Dakota to other states should open those other state-program pages rather than inferring a rank from $361,930,120.67. This file does not publish a national share or a year-over-year change because those figures are not in the packet.

North Dakota geography on CFDA 32.002

The state side of the join is North Dakota. Packet facts do not name cities. Mentioning Fargo, Bismarck, or Grand Forks only warns that those places are unpublished splits, not extra totals. Do not add a city share into $361,930,120.67.

North Dakota telecom catalogs with other CFDA numbers are other cells. Cross-border work with Minnesota, South Dakota, and Montana does not expand this cell. Quote CFDA 32.002 and North Dakota together.

Assistance awards coded to CFDA 32.002 can include grants, cooperative agreements, or other USAspending award types. The packet does not break $361,930,120.67 out by award type, so this copy does not either.

Twenty-nine awards, not 29 named carriers

The award count is 29. High counts (when they occur) still do not name carriers, exchanges, or named projects. Low counts still can sum to $361,930,120.67. Either way, the packet gives only the count and the dollars.

Agency, year, and recipient splits are omitted. No fiscal year is in the facts. Cite 29 awards and $361,930,120.67 together, not as a ranking of North Dakota.

If a dashboard elsewhere shows a different total for Universal Service Fund - High Cost in North Dakota, check whether that dashboard uses outlays, a different year, or a recipient-location field instead of place of performance. This cell uses the packet’s obligation sum of $361,930,120.67 on 29 awards.

What universal service fund - high cost in North Dakota will not prove

Caveats travel with the number: obligations, not outlays; North Dakota place of performance, not a city split; CFDA 32.002, not a named carrier roster and not the Arkansas, Mississippi, Alabama, or Oregon 32.002 joins. Packet facts include no contractors.

A future USAspending bulk file can change $361,930,120.67 and 29 together. Until then, quote both with Universal Service Fund - High Cost and North Dakota. Campaign-finance tables are a different dataset.

Parent hubs for 32.002 in North Dakota

Use /states/nd/programs/32.002/ (Universal Service Fund - High Cost in North Dakota) for the overlay, /programs/32.002/ (CFDA 32.002) for the listing, /states/nd/ (North Dakota federal spending) for the state hub, /states/nd/programs/ (North Dakota programs) for the program index, and /ties/ (All spending ties) for other pairs. Cite CFDA 32.002, North Dakota, $361,930,120.67, USAspending.gov, obligations only.

Keep Universal Service Fund - High Cost and North Dakota together when citing $361,930,120.67. CFDA 32.002 lists 29 awards on this ND join. Obligations of $361,930,120.67 are not outlays. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov for this CFDA 32.002 × ND pair. Do not add parent hubs into this state-program cell. Mean dollars per action remain about $12,480,348.99 if you divide those two facts. ND is place of performance, not a split of Fargo, Bismarck, or Grand Forks. The join is not a named carrier roster and not the Arkansas, Mississippi, Alabama, or Oregon 32.002 joins. Source note: USAspending.gov CFDA program aggregates by place of performance state. Obligations are not outlays.

Questions

How much Universal Service Fund - High Cost funding is obligated in North Dakota?
USAspending.gov records $361,930,120.67 in CFDA 32.002 obligations with North Dakota place of performance on 29 awards. That is the pair total, not an outlay and not a named carrier roster and not the Arkansas, Mississippi, Alabama, or Oregon 32.002 joins. Keep Universal Service Fund - High Cost and North Dakota together when citing $361,930,120.67. Cite both 32.002 and North Dakota together.
Do 29 awards mean 29 carriers in North Dakota?
No. 29 is a USAspending award-record count, not 29 carriers, exchanges, or named projects. The implied mean is about $12,480,348.99 per award. Unique recipients are unpublished. Obligations of $361,930,120.67 are not outlays. USAspending.gov remains the source for this 32.002 × ND pair.
Is this North Dakota’s full federal spend for related programs?
No. $361,930,120.67 is only the CFDA 32.002 × North Dakota cell. The join is not a named carrier roster and not the Arkansas, Mississippi, Alabama, or Oregon 32.002 joins. Other catalogs appear on separate North Dakota program pages. Nationwide 32.002 is not limited to North Dakota. Mixing CFDA numbers would invent a larger total.
Where is the live 32.002 × North Dakota table?
Universal Service Fund - High Cost in North Dakota is the overlay at /states/nd/programs/32.002/. CFDA 32.002 is /programs/32.002/. North Dakota federal spending is /states/nd/. North Dakota programs is /states/nd/programs/. All spending ties is /ties/. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov for this 32.002 × ND pair. Keep Universal Service Fund - High Cost and North Dakota in the same citation.

USAspending.gov CFDA program aggregates by place of performance state. Obligations are not outlays.