Veterans State Nursing Home Care in Colorado

Five state-home awards under a Colorado geography tag

The headline number is $390,916,832.38. It sits on Veterans State Nursing Home Care crossed with Colorado place of performance. Award count is 5. USAspending.gov is the source. The page is a JOIN, not a bed, facility, or resident census and not an outlay conversion.

Mean obligation is about $78,183,366.48 if $390,916,832.38 were split evenly across 5 lines — a mechanical ratio, not a typical per-diem and not a typical bed-year. State home per-diem and related assistance awards often explain why a modest row count can still carry a nine-figure book. Recipients are omitted because they are not in the facts.

Denver did not cause the total by appearing as CO. Matching 64.015 to Colorado is not a nursing-home quality ranking. Neighboring geographies (Wyoming, Utah, or New Mexico) have their own joins. The overlay is Veterans State Nursing Home Care in Colorado.

CFDA 64.015 without a bed census

Catalog language on the line is VETERANS STATE NURSING HOME CARE. That title does not convert $390,916,832.38 into a grade of Colorado's Veterans State Nursing Home Care performance. CFDA 64.015 without a Colorado filter is a different page.

VA State Veterans Home reports and CMS nursing-home compare files live elsewhere. State-veterans-home per-diem folklore is not stored on this packet. VA medical care, DIC, or disability compensation would have to carry 64.015 to sit inside $390,916,832.38; they generally do not.

Colorado's VA catalog besides state nursing-home care

Colorado federal spending and Colorado programs place 64.015 among other listings. Mixing those shelves would invent a share of Veterans State Nursing Home Care spending the packet never computed. 5 awards remain assistance rows, not a census.

Denver did not receive $390,916,832.38 as a named city appropriation. Pueblo folklore is not a metro cut. Place of performance as CO locates tagged awards.

Per-diem obligations are not resident-days already billed

Keep the obligation word on $390,916,832.38 in every footnote. Outlays are unpublished here. Remaining balances, modifications as separate lines, and draw timing are not in the facts. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov.

Pueblo-versus-Aurora folklore is not a facility split. Unique homes are unpublished. Do not treat a state-level appropriations chart as this cell unless it uses CFDA 64.015, Colorado geography, and the obligation metric.

How to cite the 64.015–Colorado pair

Start with Veterans State Nursing Home Care in Colorado for the 5-award table behind $390,916,832.38. Then step to CFDA 64.015 (nationwide), Colorado federal spending, Colorado programs, and All spending ties. Do not add those parents into the pair total.

Reuse the snapshot only with both keys: Veterans State Nursing Home Care and Colorado. Later bulk files override dollars and counts. This narrative does not invent a fiscal year.

What five Colorado state-home rows cannot prove

Correlation between a catalog code and a geography tag is the join — nothing more. FEC donations do not fund this USAspending cell. 5 awards totaling $390,916,832.38 will not be asked to prove a bed, facility, or resident census.

Pueblo-versus-Aurora folklore is not a facility split. Unique homes are unpublished. Keep Veterans State Nursing Home Care, Colorado, $390,916,832.38, and 5 awards together in every reuse. Place of performance as CO locates the tagged awards; it does not prove every dollar stayed inside Colorado after obligation. Denver folklore is not a split of the 5 rows, and Pueblo is not a named recipient of $390,916,832.38.

USAspending obligations can be positive new awards or net of downward modifications; $390,916,832.38 is the net total supplied in the facts. Treat 5 as a record count in an aggregate, not as 5 finished program years. Award modifications can sit beside base records in the same row count. The mean of about $78,183,366.48 per record will mislead anyone who treats it as a typical per-diem and not a typical bed-year.

Questions

How much Veterans State Nursing Home Care is obligated in Colorado?

USAspending.gov records $390,916,832.38 in CFDA 64.015 obligations across 5 awards coded to Colorado. That is a program × state join, not an outlay and not Colorado's full federal total. Keep both the program name and Colorado in any citation.

Do 5 awards mean 5 Colorado nursing homes?

Award count is a row count. $390,916,832.38 ÷ 5 is about $78,183,366.48 per record as a mean, not a typical per-diem and not a typical bed-year. State home per-diem and related assistance awards can dominate dollars. This packet does not list recipients. See Veterans State Nursing Home Care in Colorado for the stored table.

Does this include VA medical-center care or DIC?

No. The $390,916,832.38 and 5 awards are USAspending.gov obligation records for CFDA 64.015 with a Colorado geography tag. VA medical care, DIC, and disability compensation use different CFDAs. Those dollars sit outside this cell. Mixing those files with this join would invent a figure the packet does not support.

Where is the live Colorado × 64.015 overlay?

Veterans State Nursing Home Care in Colorado is the overlay. See Colorado federal spending, Colorado programs, CFDA 64.015, and All spending ties. Later bulk files override this snapshot. Keep the obligation label on $390,916,832.38. Do not invent a fiscal year.