WIC Special Supplemental Nutrition in Missouri

Twenty Missouri WIC awards in the assistance file

Missouri × CFDA 10.557 is the object this page measures. Wic Special Supplemental Nutrition Program For Women, Infants, And Children shows $404,492,528.85 in USAspending.gov obligations on 20 awards coded to the state. It is not SNAP benefits, SNAP administration, or other FNS listings, and it is not a clinic, participant, or food-instrument census.

Award count is a row count of assistance awards, including possible continuations and modifications. Mean obligation about $20,224,626.44 is $404,492,528.85 ÷ 20, not a typical clinic grant and not a typical participant year. State WIC awards and continuations can dominate the dollars.

Jefferson City did not earn the sum by sitting on a MO tag. Matching 10.557 to Missouri is not an infant-health ranking. FEC donations do not fund this cell. Open Wic Special Supplemental Nutrition Program For Women, Infants, And Children in Missouri rather than treating this narrative as a recipient directory.

CFDA 10.557 without a participant headcount

USAspending stores the assistance listing as WIC SPECIAL SUPPLEMENTAL NUTRITION PROGRAM FOR WOMEN, INFANTS, AND CHILDREN. SpendingVault republishes the Missouri intersection. No national WIC Special Supplemental Nutrition total is in the packet, so none is invented. CFDA 10.557 is the unfiltered hub.

Separate measurement systems include FNS WIC participation and food-cost reports and state WIC dashboards. Combining those files with 20 rows would manufacture a homemade per-unit figure. Clinic-caseload and food-instrument folklore is not a packet column.

Missouri's nutrition stack besides WIC

The statewide parent is Missouri federal spending. The program directory is Missouri programs. Both are wider than $404,492,528.85. SNAP benefits, SNAP administration, or other FNS listings appear as other joins.

Geography MO is a place-of-performance code. Awards billed through Jefferson City can share the tag. St. Louis did not receive $404,492,528.85 as a named metro appropriation. Neighbors (Illinois, Kansas, or Arkansas) are other pages.

WIC obligations are not food instruments already redeemed

Commitments and payments are different series. $404,492,528.85 is the commitment rollup on tagged awards. This page will not convert it into cash already spent on WIC Special Supplemental Nutrition.

St. Louis-versus-Kansas City folklore is not a clinic split. No food-package table is in the facts. No fiscal-year series is published on this packet, so $404,492,528.85 will not be annualized.

How to cite the 10.557–Missouri pair

Cite USAspending.gov: Wic Special Supplemental Nutrition Program For Women, Infants, And Children (CFDA 10.557) in Missouri, $404,492,528.85, 20 awards, obligations only. All spending ties is the shelf for other CFDA × state pairs.

The live overlay Wic Special Supplemental Nutrition Program For Women, Infants, And Children in Missouri can refresh after this snapshot. Parent hubs are context, not addends. Keep both sides of the join in the same sentence.

What 20 Missouri WIC rows will not prove

This page exists because two tables meet. It does not exist to argue that Missouri won or lost federal money. Correlation is not causation. 20 is not a clinic, participant, or food-instrument census.

St. Louis-versus-Kansas City folklore is not a clinic split. No food-package table is in the facts. Keep Wic Special Supplemental Nutrition Program For Women, Infants, And Children, Missouri, $404,492,528.85, and 20 awards together in every reuse. Place of performance as MO locates the tagged awards; it does not prove every dollar stayed inside Missouri after obligation. Jefferson City folklore is not a split of the 20 rows, and St. Louis is not a named recipient of $404,492,528.85.

USAspending obligations can be positive new awards or net of downward modifications; $404,492,528.85 is the net total supplied in the facts. Treat 20 as a record count in an aggregate, not as 20 finished program years. Award modifications can sit beside base records in the same row count. The mean of about $20,224,626.44 per record will mislead anyone who treats it as a typical clinic grant and not a typical participant year.

Questions

How much WIC funding is obligated in Missouri?

USAspending.gov records $404,492,528.85 in CFDA 10.557 obligations across 20 awards coded to Missouri. That is a program × state join, not an outlay and not Missouri's full federal total. Keep both the program name and Missouri in any citation.

Do 20 awards mean 20 Missouri WIC clinics?

Award count is a row count. $404,492,528.85 ÷ 20 is about $20,224,626.44 per record as a mean, not a typical clinic grant and not a typical participant year. State WIC awards and continuations can dominate dollars. This packet does not list recipients. See Wic Special Supplemental Nutrition Program For Women, Infants, And Children in Missouri for the stored table.

Is this Missouri's entire federal nutrition book?

No. The $404,492,528.85 and 20 awards are USAspending.gov obligation records for CFDA 10.557 with a Missouri geography tag. SNAP benefits, SNAP administration, and other FNS listings use different CFDAs. Those dollars sit outside this join. Mixing those files with this join would invent a figure the packet does not support.

Where is the live Missouri × 10.557 overlay?

Wic Special Supplemental Nutrition Program For Women, Infants, And Children in Missouri is the overlay. See Missouri federal spending, Missouri programs, CFDA 10.557, and All spending ties. Later bulk files override this snapshot. Keep the obligation label on $404,492,528.85. Do not invent a fiscal year.