Wic Special Supplemental Nutrition Program For Women, Infants, And Children federal funding in Oklahoma
Wic Special Supplemental Nutrition Program For Women, Infants, And Children (CFDA 10.557) shows $400,548,077.69 in USAspending.gov obligations with Oklahoma as place of performance. One hundred Forty-three awards carry that total. The join is a USDA nutrition listing crossed with a state location field, not Oklahoma's entire budget and not a census of WIC participants or grocery retailers. The dollars are commitments, not Treasury outlays.
Key figures
- CFDA 10.557 in Oklahoma shows $400,548,077.69 in USAspending obligations on one hundred forty-three awards.
- Award rows are 10.557 actions, not participants or retailers.
- The join is CFDA 10.557 plus Oklahoma place of performance, not Indiana WIC dollars.
- The total is commitments, not outlays already paid.
Oklahoma × 10.557 is a WIC join, not a caseload census
This page pairs CFDA 10.557, WIC SPECIAL SUPPLEMENTAL NUTRITION PROGRAM FOR WOMEN, INFANTS, AND CHILDREN, with Oklahoma place of performance. Wic Special Supplemental Nutrition Program For Women, Infants, And Children, as named on the catalog line, is the listing on one side of the join; Oklahoma (OK) is the geography tag on the other. SpendingVault sums tagged obligations: $400,548,077.69 on 143 awards. The extract does not list participant counts, food-package costs, or clinic counts. Treat the pair as a catalog intersection, not a ranking of which state needs the program more, and not a claim that 143 awards equal that many Oklahoma WIC clinics. Oklahoma (OK) excludes Texas, Arkansas, Kansas, Missouri, Colorado, and New Mexico. Oklahoma City and Tulsa are unpublished. Place of performance is OK statewide.
Other listings — SNAP, school meals, or other USDA nutrition listings on different CFDA numbers — sit outside $400,548,077.69 unless they also carry 10.557. Mixing WIC with those rows would invent a combined figure the packet never computed. Correlation between this obligation sum and infant-poverty rates is not causation. Those statistics are not in the packet. Place of performance as Oklahoma locates the tagged awards; it does not deposit $400,548,077.69 in the state treasury, and it does not prove every dollar stayed inside Oklahoma after subawards. tribal-and-state clinic folklore is not a published cut of this extract.
143 awards behind the Oklahoma 10.557 total
Award count is a row count of assistance awards, including possible continuations and modifications. It is not a census of WIC participants or grocery retailers. a thicker WIC file: 143 rows, still a record count rather than unique clinics. Mean obligation is about $2.80 million if $400,548,077.69 were divided evenly across one hundred forty-three lines — a mechanical ratio, not a typical payment published by the agency.
Indiana's 10.557 cell is a different geography key. Biomedical research, Adoption Assistance, and Foster Care IV-E tagged to Oklahoma are other CFDAs. One hundred forty-three awards stay on 10.557 × OK. One hundred Forty-three awards are scannable on the overlay. This page will not invent recipient names. Open Wic Special Supplemental Nutrition Program For Women, Infants, And Children in Oklahoma for the stored table. Do not convert 143 into a map of Oklahoma WIC clinics. The $400,548,077.69 total remains an obligation rollup on tagged awards.
WIC obligations are not Oklahoma food packages already issued
Assistance awards often obligate to a state or recipient and draw as activities proceed. The $400,548,077.69 headline is the obligation sum, not food benefits already redeemed, and not a Treasury outlay total. No fiscal year is attached. An agency table dated to a particular year is not automatically this join unless it uses CFDA 10.557, Oklahoma geography, and the obligation metric.
The listing title is Wic Special Supplemental Nutrition Program For Women, Infants, And Children. This extract does not split activity types inside $400,548,077.69. Those cuts would require award documentation beyond the packet facts. Indiana's 10.557 cell is a different geography key. Biomedical research, Adoption Assistance, and Foster Care IV-E tagged to Oklahoma are other CFDAs. One hundred forty-three awards stay on 10.557 × OK.
What the Oklahoma WIC table omits
The extract has no participant counts, food-package costs, or clinic counts. Facts remain $400,548,077.69, one hundred forty-three awards, CFDA 10.557, and Oklahoma. This page will not invent a ranking against other states' 10.557 joins. Oklahoma (OK) excludes Texas, Arkansas, Kansas, Missouri, Colorado, and New Mexico. Oklahoma City and Tulsa are unpublished. Place of performance is OK statewide.
Oklahoma federal spending and Oklahoma programs place 10.557 among other listings. CFDA 10.557 is the national catalog line. All spending ties indexes other CFDA × state pairs. Mixing those shelves would invent a share of federal spending the packet never computed. The $400,548,077.69 figure is the tagged pair only.
Where the 10.557 × Oklahoma overlay lives
Start with Wic Special Supplemental Nutrition Program For Women, Infants, And Children in Oklahoma for the table behind $400,548,077.69. CFDA 10.557 is the nationwide listing. Oklahoma federal spending and Oklahoma programs give state context. All spending ties is the shelf for other program-by-state joins on the same obligation metric. One hundred Forty-three awards totaling $400,548,077.69 remain a thicker WIC file: 143 rows, still a record count rather than unique clinics, not a census of WIC participants or grocery retailers. Participant counts, food-package costs, or clinic counts are not in this packet. Outlays, remaining balances, and fiscal-year splits are omitted because they are not in the facts. Use the overlay for named award lines as USAspending stored them.
SpendingVault's extract for this join publishes two quantities: $400,548,077.69 in obligations and one hundred forty-three awards. Everything else on this page is a description of what those two numbers are and are not. CFDA 10.557 is the catalog code; Oklahoma is the place-of-performance state. The page does not add a fiscal year, a recipient roster, or a share of Oklahoma spending, because those figures are not in the packet. If a dashboard elsewhere shows a different WIC total, it may be using outlays, a different year, or a different geography. Those alternatives are not this join unless they use the same CFDA, the same state field, and the same obligation metric. USAspending.gov remains the originating system.
Questions
- How much WIC is obligated in Oklahoma?
- USAspending.gov shows $400,548,077.69 in obligations for CFDA 10.557 with Oklahoma as place of performance, across one hundred forty-three awards. The sum is a commitment total on assistance awards, not outlays and not the state's entire federal-spending total. Other listings are outside this join unless they also carry 10.557.
- Do 143 awards mean 143 Oklahoma WIC clinics?
- No. Award count is a row count of assistance awards and can include continuations. It is not a census of WIC participants or grocery retailers. The packet does not name recipients. See Wic Special Supplemental Nutrition Program For Women, Infants, And Children in Oklahoma for named lines as USAspending stored them. Unique Oklahoma WIC clinics are unpublished.
- Can I add Oklahoma and Indiana WIC totals as a regional figure?
- No. The join is CFDA 10.557 crossed with Oklahoma place of performance. Related programs on other CFDA numbers are not inside $400,548,077.69 unless the award also carries 10.557. SNAP, school meals, or other USDA nutrition listings on different CFDA numbers. Mixing those rows would invent a combined figure the packet never computed.
- Is the WIC total already paid in Oklahoma?
- Not on this metric. Obligations are recorded commitments on assistance awards. Outlays are payments from the Treasury. The $400,548,077.69 headline is the obligation rollup in SpendingVault's extract. Completed activity and remaining balances are not published in this packet.
USAspending.gov CFDA program aggregates by place of performance state. Obligations are not outlays.