Wildfire Crisis Strategy Landscapes in Idaho

22 wildfire-landscape awards under an Idaho tag

The headline number is $55,205,002.54. It sits on Wildfire Crisis Strategy Landscapes crossed with Idaho place of performance. Award count is 22. USAspending.gov is the source. The page is a JOIN, not an acre, forest, or fire-incident census and not an outlay conversion.

Mean obligation is about $2,509,318.30 if $55,205,002.54 were split evenly across 22 lines — a mechanical ratio, not a typical landscape project and not a typical treated acre. Landscape-scale wildfire-risk awards and agreements often explain why a modest row count can still carry a nine-figure book. Recipients are omitted because they are not in the facts.

Boise did not earn the sum by sitting on an ID tag. Correlation between Idaho geography and 10.724 is the join, nothing more. Neighboring geographies (Washington, Oregon, or Montana) have their own joins. The overlay is Wildfire Crisis Strategy Landscapes in Idaho.

Wildfire Crisis Strategy Landscapes without an acre roster

Catalog language on the line is WILDFIRE CRISIS STRATEGY LANDSCAPES. That title does not convert $55,205,002.54 into a grade of Idaho's Wildfire Crisis Strategy Landscapes performance. CFDA 10.724 without a Idaho filter is a different page.

USFS wildfire-crisis landscape announcements and state forestry reports live elsewhere. Landscape-treatment folklore is not stored on this packet. Hazardous-fuels or FEMA fire-management listings would have to carry 10.724 to sit inside $55,205,002.54; they generally do not.

Idaho's federal book besides 10.724

Idaho federal spending and Idaho programs place 10.724 among other listings. Mixing those shelves would invent a share of Wildfire Crisis Strategy Landscapes spending the packet never computed. 22 awards remain assistance rows, not a census.

Boise did not receive $55,205,002.54 as a named city appropriation. Coeur d'Alene folklore is not a metro cut. Place of performance as ID locates tagged awards.

Landscape obligations are not acres already treated

Keep the obligation word on $55,205,002.54 in every footnote. Outlays are unpublished here. Remaining balances, modifications as separate lines, and draw timing are not in the facts. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov.

Coeur d'Alene-versus-McCall folklore is not a forest split. Unique fires are unpublished. Do not treat a state-level appropriations chart as this cell unless it uses CFDA 10.724, Idaho geography, and the obligation metric.

How to cite the 10.724–Idaho join

Start with Wildfire Crisis Strategy Landscapes in Idaho for the 22-award table behind $55,205,002.54. Then step to CFDA 10.724 (nationwide), Idaho federal spending, Idaho programs, and All spending ties. Do not add those parents into the pair total.

Reuse the snapshot only with both keys: Wildfire Crisis Strategy Landscapes and Idaho. Later bulk files override dollars and counts. This narrative does not invent a fiscal year.

What 22 Idaho wildfire-landscape rows cannot stretch into

Correlation between a catalog code and a geography tag is the join — nothing more. FEC donations do not fund this USAspending cell. 22 awards totaling $55,205,002.54 will not be asked to prove an acre, forest, or fire-incident census.

Coeur d'Alene-versus-McCall folklore is not a forest split. Unique fires are unpublished. Keep Wildfire Crisis Strategy Landscapes, Idaho, $55,205,002.54, and 22 awards together in every reuse. Place of performance as ID locates the tagged awards; it does not prove every dollar stayed inside Idaho after obligation. Boise folklore is not a split of the 22 rows, and Coeur d'Alene is not a named recipient of $55,205,002.54.

USAspending obligations can be positive new awards or net of downward modifications; $55,205,002.54 is the net total supplied in the facts. Treat 22 as a record count in an aggregate, not as 22 finished program years. Award modifications can sit beside base records in the same row count. The mean of about $2,509,318.30 per record will mislead anyone who treats it as a typical landscape project and not a typical treated acre.

Questions

How much Wildfire Crisis Strategy Landscapes funding is obligated in Idaho?

USAspending.gov records $55,205,002.54 in CFDA 10.724 obligations across 22 awards coded to Idaho. That is a program × state join, not an outlay and not Idaho's full federal total. Keep both the program name and Idaho in any citation.

Do 22 awards mean 22 Idaho fires?

Award count is a row count. $55,205,002.54 ÷ 22 is about $2,509,318.30 per record as a mean, not a typical landscape project and not a typical treated acre. Landscape-scale wildfire-risk awards and agreements can dominate dollars. This packet does not list recipients. See Wildfire Crisis Strategy Landscapes in Idaho for the stored table.

Is this Idaho's entire federal forestry or fire book?

No. The $55,205,002.54 and 22 awards are USAspending.gov obligation records for CFDA 10.724 with a Idaho geography tag. Hazardous-fuels, FEMA fire-management, and other USFS listings use different CFDAs. Those dollars sit outside this join. Mixing those files with this join would invent a figure the packet does not support.

Where is the live Idaho × 10.724 table?

Wildfire Crisis Strategy Landscapes in Idaho is the overlay. See Idaho federal spending, Idaho programs, CFDA 10.724, and All spending ties. Later bulk files override this snapshot. Keep the obligation label on $55,205,002.54. Do not invent a fiscal year.