Alabama vs California
Federal spending comparison
California’s USAspending.gov obligation stock is $39.5B; Alabama’s is $7.7B. Both states peak in the same lead industry — commercial and institutional building construction — so this comparison is mostly about scale and a modest intensity gap, not a different NAICS headline. Census counts are 5,157,699 in Alabama and 39,431,263 in California. Spending per capita is $116.81 versus $135.64. Award counts are 161,254 in Alabama and 639,340 in California. FY2026 obligations are $602.5M in Alabama and $5.3B in California. These figures are obligations, not outlays.
Key figures
- California $39.5B vs Alabama $7.7B in stacked USAspending obligations.
- Both peak in commercial and institutional building construction.
- Per capita: California $135.64 vs Alabama $116.81 on 39,431,263 vs 5,157,699 residents.
- Awards: 639,340 vs 161,254; FY2026 $5.3B vs $602.5M.
- Figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not Treasury outlays.
Same construction label, a $39.5B versus $7.7B stack
Alabama’s top industry is commercial and institutional building construction. California’s top industry is the same label. A shared lead NAICS does not make the files interchangeable. It means the largest slice in each statewide aggregate is federal building work, sitting on $7.7B in Alabama and $39.5B in California.
Construction awards can be lumpy. A few large facilities can move a year; thousands of smaller task orders can fill the rest of the 161,254 and 639,340 rows. The lead-industry tag is a peak in the mix, not a census of every recipient. Open the Alabama and California state hubs for agencies and recipients. Cite USAspending.gov.
Population and the $116.81 reading
Alabama’s 5,157,699 residents are about 13 percent of California’s 39,431,263. Alabama’s $7.7B is about 19 percent of California’s $39.5B. Dollars slightly outrun population, yet California still leads on $135.64 versus $116.81. The intensity gap is small compared with many California pairings in this slice.
Keep those per-capita figures labeled as Census-based packet figures on USAspending.gov obligations. They are not outlays per resident. Place-of-performance for construction can sit at a job site. The packet does not reallocate contractor headquarters.
Full analysis: Alabama vs California on USAspending: $7.7B against $39.5B →
Questions
- Does Alabama or California have more federal spending?
- California leads stacked USAspending.gov obligations $39.5B to Alabama’s $7.7B. California also leads spending per capita, $135.64 versus $116.81, on 39,431,263 residents against Alabama’s 5,157,699. Award counts are 639,340 in California and 161,254 in Alabama. FY2026 obligations are $5.3B in California and $602.5M in Alabama.
- Do Alabama and California have the same lead industry?
- Yes. Both peak in commercial and institutional building construction. Those labels sit on $7.7B in Alabama and $39.5B in California. Award counts are 161,254 versus 639,340. A shared peak is a mix tag, not evidence that the files are the same size. The figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not outlays.
- Is Alabama’s per-capita figure close to California’s?
- The packet reports $116.81 per capita in Alabama on 5,157,699 residents and $135.64 in California on 39,431,263. The intensity gap is modest compared with many other California pairings. Stacked stocks are $7.7B versus $39.5B. The packet lists USAspending.gov obligations only.
- Are Alabama vs California figures Treasury outlays?
- No. The $7.7B and $39.5B totals, and FY2026 amounts of $602.5M and $5.3B, are USAspending.gov obligations. Outlays are cash payments and can lag. Spending per capita ($116.81 vs $135.64) uses Census population where present. Award counts in the packet are all-years totals, not a single fiscal year’s actions.
State comparison from SpendingVault aggregates of USAspending obligations. Per-capita uses Census population where present.
| Alabama | Metric | California |
|---|---|---|
| $28.31B | Total Spending | $222.27B |
| $5K | Per Capita | $6K |
| N/A | % of GDP | N/A |
| 5.2M | Population | 39.4M |
| N/A | Median Income | N/A |
| N/A | Poverty Rate | N/A |
| N/A | Bachelor Degree % | N/A |
| N/A | Median Age | N/A |
| N/A | Unemployment | N/A |
| N/A | GDP (Millions) | N/A |
Top Agencies — Alabama
- Department of Defense$125.69B
- Social Security Administration$69.72B
- Department of Health and Human Services$46.27B
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration$19.27B
- Department of Veterans Affairs$13.75B
Top Agencies — California
- Department of Health and Human Services$961.70B
- Social Security Administration$397.49B
- Department of Defense$301.91B
- Department of Energy$116.54B
- Department of Agriculture$85.61B
Top Industries — Alabama
- RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE PHYSICAL, ENGINEERING, AND LIFE SCIENCES (EXCEPT BIOTECHNOLOGY)$20.73B
- RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES$18.78B
- RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE PHYSICAL, ENGINEERING, AND LIFE SCIENCES (EXCEPT NANOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY)$17.30B
- GUIDED MISSILE AND SPACE VEHICLE MANUFACTURING$16.46B
- SHIP BUILDING AND REPAIRING$14.89B
Top Industries — California
- RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE PHYSICAL, ENGINEERING, AND LIFE SCIENCES$84.92B
- AIRCRAFT MANUFACTURING$48.92B
- RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE PHYSICAL, ENGINEERING, AND LIFE SCIENCES (EXCEPT NANOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY)$45.14B
- DIRECT HEALTH AND MEDICAL INSURANCE CARRIERS$42.95B
- COLLEGES, UNIVERSITIES, AND PROFESSIONAL SCHOOLS$37.36B
Source: USAspending.gov · More Comparisons · Alabama · California