Nevada vs New Hampshire

Nevada’s stock and recency, New Hampshire’s ratio

Nevada’s $2.86B is the larger stacked total. New Hampshire’s $2.48B sits on 1,409,032 residents against 3,267,467. Intensity therefore favors New Hampshire: $284.15 per capita versus $171.84. Both ratios are high relative to larger Census states; New Hampshire’s is higher.

Award volume favors Nevada, 45,442 versus 9,224. Nevada’s file is busier in rows and larger in stock. New Hampshire’s 9,224 actions sit on $2.48B beside the $284.15 reading.

FY2026 keeps Nevada ahead on recency: $561.5M versus $400.4M. Cite USAspending.gov for the stacked stocks and the latest-year amounts.

Nevada’s $2.86B, 45,442 awards, 3,267,467 residents, and $561.5M in FY2026 are the volume side. New Hampshire’s $2.48B, 9,224 awards, 1,409,032 residents, $284.15 per capita, and $400.4M in FY2026 are the intensity side. Both dollar stocks are USAspending.gov obligations.

Automobile manufacturing versus small arms, ordnance, and ordnance accessories manufacturing is mix. Nevada’s $171.84 per capita is also high; New Hampshire’s $284.15 is higher. Outlays are not in the packet. Cite USAspending.gov.

Automobiles versus small arms and ordnance

Nevada’s lead NAICS is automobile manufacturing. New Hampshire’s lead NAICS is small arms, ordnance, and ordnance accessories manufacturing. Those peaks sit on $2.86B and $2.48B. Auto manufacturing is a first read on Nevada’s mix; ordnance is a first read on New Hampshire’s mix.

The 45,442 Nevada awards and 9,224 New Hampshire awards include many actions outside those labels. Use the Nevada and New Hampshire state hubs for agencies and recipients. Both peaks are USAspending.gov obligation mixes.

Questions

Does Nevada or New Hampshire have more federal spending?

Nevada leads stacked USAspending.gov obligations $2.86B to New Hampshire’s $2.48B. New Hampshire leads spending per capita, $284.15 versus $171.84, on 1,409,032 residents against Nevada’s 3,267,467. Nevada has more awards (45,442 vs 9,224). FY2026 obligations are $561.5M in Nevada and $400.4M in New Hampshire.

Why is New Hampshire’s per-capita figure higher than Nevada’s?

The packet reports $284.15 per capita in New Hampshire on 1,409,032 residents and $171.84 in Nevada on 3,267,467. Stacked stocks are $2.48B versus $2.86B. Award counts are 9,224 versus 45,442. These figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not outlays.

What industries lead in Nevada and New Hampshire?

Nevada’s top industry is automobile manufacturing. New Hampshire’s is small arms, ordnance, and ordnance accessories manufacturing. Those labels are the largest NAICS slices on $2.86B and $2.48B. Award counts are 45,442 in Nevada and 9,224 in New Hampshire.

Are Nevada vs New Hampshire figures Treasury outlays?

No. The $2.86B and $2.48B totals, and FY2026 amounts of $561.5M and $400.4M, are USAspending.gov obligations. Outlays are cash payments and can lag. Spending per capita ($171.84 vs $284.15) uses Census population where present.