Nevada vs New Hampshire on USAspending: $2.86B vs $2.48B

Nevada’s stock and recency, New Hampshire’s ratio

Nevada’s $2.86B is the larger stacked total. New Hampshire’s $2.48B sits on 1,409,032 residents against 3,267,467. Intensity therefore favors New Hampshire: $284.15 per capita versus $171.84. Both ratios are high relative to larger Census states; New Hampshire’s is higher.

Award volume favors Nevada, 45,442 versus 9,224. Nevada’s file is busier in rows and larger in stock. New Hampshire’s 9,224 actions sit on $2.48B beside the $284.15 reading.

FY2026 keeps Nevada ahead on recency: $561.5M versus $400.4M. Cite USAspending.gov for the stacked stocks and the latest-year amounts.

Nevada’s $2.86B, 45,442 awards, 3,267,467 residents, and $561.5M in FY2026 are the volume side. New Hampshire’s $2.48B, 9,224 awards, 1,409,032 residents, $284.15 per capita, and $400.4M in FY2026 are the intensity side. Both dollar stocks are USAspending.gov obligations.

Automobile manufacturing versus small arms, ordnance, and ordnance accessories manufacturing is mix. Nevada’s $171.84 per capita is also high; New Hampshire’s $284.15 is higher. Outlays are not in the packet. Cite USAspending.gov.

Automobiles versus small arms and ordnance

Nevada’s lead NAICS is automobile manufacturing. New Hampshire’s lead NAICS is small arms, ordnance, and ordnance accessories manufacturing. Those peaks sit on $2.86B and $2.48B. Auto manufacturing is a first read on Nevada’s mix; ordnance is a first read on New Hampshire’s mix.

The 45,442 Nevada awards and 9,224 New Hampshire awards include many actions outside those labels. Use the Nevada and New Hampshire state hubs for agencies and recipients. Both peaks are USAspending.gov obligation mixes.

FY2026: $561.5M versus $400.4M

Fiscal year 2026 obligations are $561.5M in Nevada and $400.4M in New Hampshire. Recency preserves Nevada’s stacked dollar lead. Treat the year as a recency slice of obligations, not as Treasury cash.

Do not divide $561.5M or $400.4M by 45,442 or 9,224 all-years awards. Spending per capita of $171.84 and $284.15 already sits beside Census counts of 3,267,467 and 1,409,032.

Auto manufacturing stock versus ordnance intensity

Nevada’s $2.86B on 3,267,467 residents exceeds New Hampshire’s $2.48B on 1,409,032. New Hampshire still posts $284.15 per capita against Nevada’s $171.84. Nevada files 45,442 awards against 9,224 and $561.5M in FY2026 against $400.4M.

Automobile manufacturing leads Nevada. Small arms, ordnance, and ordnance accessories manufacturing lead New Hampshire. Those peaks sit on USAspending.gov obligations. Outlays are not listed.

An obligation is a commitment. Cash can lag. Cite USAspending.gov for the dollar figures. Keep per-capita labeled as Census-based obligation ratios.

Two high ratios, one larger Census count

Both $171.84 and $284.15 are high relative to many larger states. New Hampshire’s ratio is higher on fewer people. Nevada’s stock, awards, and FY2026 are larger.

The comparison hub holds the tables. The Nevada and New Hampshire hubs hold agencies and recipients. Do not convert $2.86B or $2.48B into cash outlays.

How to read Nevada versus New Hampshire

Read Nevada first on stacked dollars ($2.86B vs $2.48B), population (3,267,467 vs 1,409,032), awards (45,442 vs 9,224), and FY2026 ($561.5M vs $400.4M). Read New Hampshire first on spending per capita ($284.15 vs $171.84). Note automobile manufacturing versus small arms and ordnance.

The comparison hub holds the tables. The Nevada and New Hampshire hubs hold agencies and recipients. Outlays are a different series. Keep per-capita figures labeled as Census-based packet figures on USAspending.gov obligations.

Nevada’s $2.86B and $561.5M FY2026 slice lead the dollar stock and recency. New Hampshire’s $284.15 per capita on 1,409,032 residents leads intensity. Cite USAspending.gov. Keep both stocks labeled as obligations, not outlays.

Questions

Does Nevada or New Hampshire have more federal spending?

Nevada leads stacked USAspending.gov obligations $2.86B to New Hampshire’s $2.48B. New Hampshire leads spending per capita, $284.15 versus $171.84, on 1,409,032 residents against Nevada’s 3,267,467. Nevada has more awards (45,442 vs 9,224). FY2026 obligations are $561.5M in Nevada and $400.4M in New Hampshire.

Why is New Hampshire’s per-capita figure higher than Nevada’s?

The packet reports $284.15 per capita in New Hampshire on 1,409,032 residents and $171.84 in Nevada on 3,267,467. Stacked stocks are $2.48B versus $2.86B. Award counts are 9,224 versus 45,442. These figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not outlays.

What industries lead in Nevada and New Hampshire?

Nevada’s top industry is automobile manufacturing. New Hampshire’s is small arms, ordnance, and ordnance accessories manufacturing. Those labels are the largest NAICS slices on $2.86B and $2.48B. Award counts are 45,442 in Nevada and 9,224 in New Hampshire.

Are Nevada vs New Hampshire figures Treasury outlays?

No. The $2.86B and $2.48B totals, and FY2026 amounts of $561.5M and $400.4M, are USAspending.gov obligations. Outlays are cash payments and can lag. Spending per capita ($171.84 vs $284.15) uses Census population where present.