USAspending in Colorado District 05, FY2024

Sixteen thousand four hundred forty-eight awards

USAspending.gov ties 16,448 award records to Colorado District 05 place of performance in FY2024. Those records sum to $24.3 billion in obligations. Sixteen thousand four hundred forty-eight is a record count, not a unique-firm census. Task orders and modifications can each add a row without adding a new vendor.

The packet does not publish an agency mix. Do not divide $24.3 billion by 16,448 and treat the quotient as a typical contract. Keep the dollar total and the row count as separate facts.

Performance coded to CO-05

The district field is place of performance. Recipients headquartered outside District 05 can still appear in the $24.3 billion if USAspending codes the work to CO-05. Colorado-based firms can be missing when performance is tagged to Colorado District 06, District 04, Colorado’s 90 leftover, or another state.

HQ lists of “5th district contractors” will not reproduce this extract. The page answers where performance was coded, not where the vendor’s mailroom sits. This packet does not quote those other Colorado districts’ dollars.

Mapped House seat, not a residual bin

Colorado District 05 is a voting congressional district. USAspending uses 90 and 98 for unspecified or non-voting place-of-performance buckets. This hub’s $24.3 billion is mapped to numbered code 05. Residual Colorado performance would sit on a 90 page if that code exists in the source file.

The Colorado state page is the statewide place-of-performance rollup. It will not match $24.3 billion. Use the all-districts index to compare formats across seats.

FY2024 obligations only

First year and last year are both 2024. There is no District 05 year-over-year series in these facts. Federal FY2024 starts October 1. Later source corrections can revise $24.3 billion and the 16,448-award count.

Obligations are commitments. Outlays are payments. SpendingVault does not convert the CO-05 total into cash disbursed inside the 5th district. Cite $24,267,357,420 as FY2024 obligations with CO-05 place of performance.

Colorado hubs next to this page

The Colorado District 05 hub is the table. The Colorado state page rolls statewide performance. The all-districts index lists other Colorado numbered districts and unspecified 90/98 codes. None of those other pages’ dollars are inside this packet.

What the CO-05 citation should include

Name Colorado District 05, FY2024, USAspending.gov, place of performance, obligations, $24.3 billion, and 16,448 awards. Keep the code on a numbered-seat row, not on a 90/98 residual line. Headquarters without a CO-05 tag do not enter the file.

The 16,448-award count is a single-year record stock. It is not 16,448 unique companies. The Colorado District 05 hub is the place to inspect the mix; this guide only certifies the two rollup facts and the FY2024 window.

Colorado District 05 can be briefed as $24.3 billion in FY2024 obligations on 16,448 awards with numbered code CO-05. The 16,448-award count is a single-year action stock beside $24.3 billion. It is not a unique-vendor census. Keep other Colorado numbered districts and any District 90 leftover on other rows. None of their totals sits inside $24.3 billion. This packet does not supply those other dollars. What it supplies is CO-05 place-of-performance commitments from USAspending.gov, not outlays, not a headquarters extract, and not a multi-year series. A headquarters in the 5th without a CO-05 tag does not enter this file. Work coded to CO-05 from a vendor based elsewhere does enter $24.3 billion. The Colorado state page rolls all Colorado codes and will not equal $24.3 billion. FY2024 is the only year in the facts. Federal FY2024 starts October 1. Later USAspending corrections can revise both the dollar sum and the award count. Until a later extract, report $24.3 billion and 16,448 awards for CO-05 place of performance as obligations, not outlays.

Colorado District 05 can be briefed as $24.3 billion in FY2024 obligations on 16,448 awards with numbered code CO-05. Sixteen thousand four hundred forty-eight is an action stock, not unique companies. Keep other Colorado numbered districts and any District 90 leftover on other rows. None of their totals sits inside $24.3 billion. A headquarters in the 5th without a CO-05 tag does not enter this file. The Colorado state page rolls all Colorado codes and will not equal $24.3 billion. Cite USAspending.gov, place of performance, obligations, $24.3 billion, and 16,448 awards, FY2024 only.

Questions

How much federal spending is in Colorado District 05?

USAspending.gov records $24.3 billion in FY2024 obligations with Colorado District 05 place of performance, across 16,448 awards. That is not an outlay total and not a headquarters extract. The packet year range is FY2024 only. Those figures are FY2024 USAspending obligations with CO-05 place of performance, covering 16,448 awards, not outlays and not a headquarters extract.

Is Colorado District 05 a 90 unspecified bucket?

No. District 05 is a numbered Colorado House seat. Codes 90 and 98 are USAspending unspecified or non-voting bins. The $24.3 billion total uses the CO-05 place-of-performance code. 16,448 awards share that tag. Keep $24.3 billion and 16,448 as separate certified facts from USAspending.gov for fiscal year 2024 only.

Are Colorado District 05 dollars based on contractor HQ?

No. The district is place of performance. Recipients based outside the 5th can still appear if performance is coded CO-05. A District 05 headquarters can map dollars to another district when performance is coded there. The CO-05 tag is the geography rule; an office address in Colorado is neither required nor enough to enter the 16,448 records.

Does 16,448 awards mean 16,448 companies?

No. 16,448 is the FY2024 award-record count for CO-05 place of performance. Modifications and assistance actions can each add a row. The packet does not publish unique recipients. Those records sum to $24.3 billion in obligations. Cite the figure with the obligation label, the FY2024 window, and CO-05 place of performance rather than recipient headquarters.