Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in District of Columbia

EEOC awards tagged to the District of Columbia

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission as awarding agency, District of Columbia as place-of-performance: 183 records summing to $95,675,346.48. An Equal Employment Opportunity Commission award coded outside DC is out. An award in District of Columbia from a different awarding agency is out even if the topic sounds related. The District of Columbia (DC) excludes Maryland and Virginia. A Silver Spring-coded award is MD even if the Commission sits in the District. Awarding agency 045 is the EEOC parent. District offices outside DC are other geography keys.

One hundred eighty-three records against $95,675,346.48 is a thin EEOC file. A DC tag often marks headquarters place of performance, not a local charge census. Unique recipients are unpublished. Do not read 183 as 183 unique charges, named employers, or unique complainants. The overlay Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in District of Columbia is the both-keys table. District of Columbia federal spending is the all-agency state hub. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission is the agency book without a DC filter. All spending ties lists other joins. Named respondents are unpublished. Do not read 183 as unique District employers or as a national charge rollup glued to DC. Correlation is not causation: District of Columbia did not cause $95,675,346.48 by existing as a large or small place. Population and outcome scores are not packet facts. The join is 045 × DC only.

Not a charge docket or named-employer list

$95,675,346.48 does not measure unique charges, named employers, or unique complainants. Those series are not USAspending fields on this aggregate. The cell sums award obligations with awarding-agency code 045 and a DC place-of-performance tag. Awarding agency 045 is the EEOC parent. District offices outside DC are other geography keys.

Do not treat 183 awards as a census of unique charges, named employers, or unique complainants. Parent hubs are supposed to be larger than this pair. If District of Columbia federal spending or Equal Employment Opportunity Commission matched $95,675,346.48 and 183, the join would be pointless. Use the overlay when both keys must stay on. Maryland and Virginia EEOC joins are other pairs, not addends. A DC headquarters tag is not Maryland and not Virginia. Keep $95,675,346.48 on DC.

Questions

How much has the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission obligated in District of Columbia?

USAspending.gov records $95,675,346.48 across 183 awards with awarding agency 045 and a District of Columbia tag. That is an obligation join, not an outlay and not a count of unique charges, named employers, or unique complainants. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in District of Columbia is the live overlay for this pair. Keep both keys when quoting $95,675,346.48.

Is $95,675,346.48 a measure of unique charges, named employers, or unique complainants?

No. The packet publishes $95,675,346.48 and 183 awards for agency 045 inside DC coding. Those other series are unpublished here. Unique recipients are unpublished. Quote the dollar total and the award count together. Obligations are not outlays. Keep both keys.

Does 183 EEOC awards mean 183 District charges?

No. 183 is the award-record count for 045 × DC. Combined with $95,675,346.48, the average is about $522,816. Modifications and repeat instruments add rows. 183 is not unique charges, named employers, or unique complainants. Later ingests can revise the count. Prefer the overlay if the table moved.

Where is the live EEOC–District of Columbia table?

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in District of Columbia is the overlay. District of Columbia federal spending and Equal Employment Opportunity Commission are the parents, not addends. All spending ties lists other pairs. Keep both sides of the join when citing $95,675,346.48. USAspending.gov is the source. Obligations are not outlays.