How much has the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission obligated in District of Columbia?

USAspending.gov records $95,675,346.48 across 183 awards with awarding agency 045 and a District of Columbia tag. That is an obligation join, not an outlay and not a count of unique charges, named employers, or unique complainants. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in District of Columbia is the live overlay for this pair. Keep both keys when quoting $95,675,346.48.

Is $95,675,346.48 a measure of unique charges, named employers, or unique complainants?

No. The packet publishes $95,675,346.48 and 183 awards for agency 045 inside DC coding. Those other series are unpublished here. Unique recipients are unpublished. Quote the dollar total and the award count together. Obligations are not outlays. Keep both keys.

Does 183 EEOC awards mean 183 District charges?

No. 183 is the award-record count for 045 × DC. Combined with $95,675,346.48, the average is about $522,816. Modifications and repeat instruments add rows. 183 is not unique charges, named employers, or unique complainants. Later ingests can revise the count. Prefer the overlay if the table moved.

Where is the live EEOC–District of Columbia table?

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in District of Columbia is the overlay. District of Columbia federal spending and Equal Employment Opportunity Commission are the parents, not addends. All spending ties lists other pairs. Keep both sides of the join when citing $95,675,346.48. USAspending.gov is the source. Obligations are not outlays.

← All data ties

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission federal obligations in District of Columbia

$95,675,346.48 in USAspending.gov obligations is the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission total coded to District of Columbia, across 183 awards. The pair is EEOC plus the District of Columbia, not a national charge ledger. Awarding-agency 045 and District of Columbia (DC) are the pair. One hundred eighty-three records against $95,675,346.48 is a thin EEOC file. A DC tag often marks headquarters place of performance, not a local charge census. The implied mean is about $522,816 per award — a quotient of two packet facts, not a typical project. USAspending.gov is the source. Amounts are obligations, not outlays.

Key figures

EEOC in District of Columbia: $95,675,346.48 across 183 USAspending awards.
Implied mean about $522,816 per record — a packet quotient, not a typical project.
Agency 045 × DC is not a measure of unique charges, named employers, or unique complainants.
Cite obligations from USAspending.gov, not outlays.
the District’s wards share one DC stamp share one DC place-of-performance tag.

EEOC awards tagged to the District of Columbia

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission as awarding agency, District of Columbia as place-of-performance: 183 records summing to $95,675,346.48. An Equal Employment Opportunity Commission award coded outside DC is out. An award in District of Columbia from a different awarding agency is out even if the topic sounds related. The District of Columbia (DC) excludes Maryland and Virginia. A Silver Spring-coded award is MD even if the Commission sits in the District. Awarding agency 045 is the EEOC parent. District offices outside DC are other geography keys.

One hundred eighty-three records against $95,675,346.48 is a thin EEOC file. A DC tag often marks headquarters place of performance, not a local charge census. Unique recipients are unpublished. Do not read 183 as 183 unique charges, named employers, or unique complainants. The overlay Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in District of Columbia is the both-keys table. District of Columbia federal spending is the all-agency state hub. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission is the agency book without a DC filter. All spending ties lists other joins. Named respondents are unpublished. Do not read 183 as unique District employers or as a national charge rollup glued to DC. Correlation is not causation: District of Columbia did not cause $95,675,346.48 by existing as a large or small place. Population and outcome scores are not packet facts. The join is 045 × DC only.

Not a charge docket or named-employer list

$95,675,346.48 does not measure unique charges, named employers, or unique complainants. Those series are not USAspending fields on this aggregate. The cell sums award obligations with awarding-agency code 045 and a DC place-of-performance tag. Awarding agency 045 is the EEOC parent. District offices outside DC are other geography keys.

Do not treat 183 awards as a census of unique charges, named employers, or unique complainants. Parent hubs are supposed to be larger than this pair. If District of Columbia federal spending or Equal Employment Opportunity Commission matched $95,675,346.48 and 183, the join would be pointless. Use the overlay when both keys must stay on. Maryland and Virginia EEOC joins are other pairs, not addends. A DC headquarters tag is not Maryland and not Virginia. Keep $95,675,346.48 on DC.

DC place of performance, not a Maryland-Virginia rollup

Place of performance DC is a geography tag on the award, not a metro list and not a commuting zone. The District of Columbia (DC) excludes Maryland and Virginia. A Silver Spring-coded award is MD even if the Commission sits in the District. Recipient address can differ from that state tag. the District’s wards share one DC stamp share one DC stamp.

Named respondents are unpublished. Do not read 183 as unique District employers or as a national charge rollup glued to DC. This packet does not split $95,675,346.48 by city, county, or named facility. 183 awards stay statewide. A county table would be a different extract. FEC donation tables do not fund these USAspending obligations.

Headquarters geography still records obligations

Even a thick or thin file records obligations, not necessarily outlays. $95,675,346.48 can include amounts that pay on a later schedule. Citing it as cash already sent in District of Columbia confuses two concepts. Deobligations and upward adjustments both move the total.

District of Columbia’s own budget is a different ledger. Mixing it with the 183-award USAspending file leaves this series. No fiscal year is published in this packet, so this page does not invent one. Keep the obligation label on $95,675,346.48. A DC headquarters tag is not Maryland and not Virginia. Keep $95,675,346.48 on DC.

Citing EEOC in the District of Columbia

Cite USAspending.gov: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (agency 045) obligated $95,675,346.48 on 183 awards coded to District of Columbia. Name both sides. Keep “obligations.” Do not relabel the total as unique charges, named employers, or unique complainants. The pair is EEOC plus the District of Columbia, not a national charge ledger.

Prefer Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in District of Columbia if the overlay has refreshed after an ingest. District of Columbia federal spending still includes every other awarding agency tagged to DC. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission is the 045 parent without the DC filter. All spending ties indexes other pairs. Do not add those parents into $95,675,346.48. A usable footnote names Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, District of Columbia, $95,675,346.48, and 183. The compact headline $95.7 million is that same dollar total rounded. It is not a second extract. The implied mean near $522,816 is $95,675,346.48 divided by 183. Means are not medians. USAspending.gov remains the originating system.

Questions

How much has the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission obligated in District of Columbia?: USAspending.gov records $95,675,346.48 across 183 awards with awarding agency 045 and a District of Columbia tag. That is an obligation join, not an outlay and not a count of unique charges, named employers, or unique complainants. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in District of Columbia is the live overlay for this pair. Keep both keys when quoting $95,675,346.48.
Is $95,675,346.48 a measure of unique charges, named employers, or unique complainants?: No. The packet publishes $95,675,346.48 and 183 awards for agency 045 inside DC coding. Those other series are unpublished here. Unique recipients are unpublished. Quote the dollar total and the award count together. Obligations are not outlays. Keep both keys.
Does 183 EEOC awards mean 183 District charges?: No. 183 is the award-record count for 045 × DC. Combined with $95,675,346.48, the average is about $522,816. Modifications and repeat instruments add rows. 183 is not unique charges, named employers, or unique complainants. Later ingests can revise the count. Prefer the overlay if the table moved.
Where is the live EEOC–District of Columbia table?: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in District of Columbia is the overlay. District of Columbia federal spending and Equal Employment Opportunity Commission are the parents, not addends. All spending ties lists other pairs. Keep both sides of the join when citing $95,675,346.48. USAspending.gov is the source. Obligations are not outlays.

USAspending.gov aggregate of federal obligations by state and awarding agency. Obligations are not outlays.