Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Kansas

Kansas x 10.912 is an EQIP join, not an acreage census

This page pairs CFDA 10.912, ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY INCENTIVES PROGRAM, with Kansas place of performance. The join is a USDA NRCS cost-share listing crossed with a state location field, not Kansas’s entire conservation budget and not a census of farms. SpendingVault sums tagged obligations: $185,600,857.13 on 4528 awards. The extract does not list acres, practice codes, or farm names. Treat the pair as a catalog intersection, not a ranking of which state has more need, and not a claim that 4528 awards equal 4,528 farms or 4,528 practices.

Other USDA listings — CRP, ACEP, or different NRCS titles — sit outside this total unless they also carry 10.912. Mixing those listings into $185,600,857.13 would invent a combined figure the packet never computed. Correlation between this obligation sum and cropland acres is not causation. Acreage figures are not in the packet. Place of performance as Kansas locates the tagged awards; it does not deposit $185,600,857.13 in the state treasury. Wichita-versus-western-Kansas folklore is not a county split in this packet. A high row count is still a record count, including modifications.

4,528 awards behind $185.6 million

Mean obligation is about $40,989.59 if $185,600,857.13 were divided evenly across 4528 lines. That ratio is not a published cost-share rate and not a cost per acre. Award count is a row count, including possible continuations and modifications. It is not a count of farms, practices, or counties.

Four thousand five hundred twenty-eight lines are too many to narrate one by one. Sort the Kansas 10.912 overlay by amount to see concentration. This page will not invent recipient names. Open Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Kansas for the stored table. Do not convert 4528 into a map of Kansas farms. The $185,600,857.13 total remains an obligation rollup on tagged awards. Inspect named lines rather than inferring an acreage census.

Questions

How much EQIP funding is obligated in Kansas?

USAspending.gov shows $185,600,857.13 in obligations for CFDA 10.912 with Kansas as place of performance, across 4528 awards. The sum is a commitment total on assistance awards, not outlays and not Kansas’s full conservation budget. Other listings are outside this join unless they also carry 10.912.

Do 4,528 awards mean 4,528 Kansas farms?

No. Award count is a row count of assistance awards and can include continuations and modifications. It is not a farm or acre census. The packet does not name producers. See the Kansas 10.912 overlay for named lines as USAspending stored them.

Does this include CRP in Kansas?

No. This page is CFDA 10.912, Environmental Quality Incentives Program. CRP and ACEP use different CFDA numbers. Those dollars are not inside $185,600,857.13 unless the award also carries 10.912. The extract has no acreage table.

Is $186 million already spent on Kansas conservation practices?

Not on this metric. Obligations are recorded commitments on assistance awards. Outlays are payments from the Treasury. The $185,600,857.13 headline is the obligation rollup in SpendingVault’s extract. Certified practices and remaining balances are not published in this packet.